Environmental impact of dwellings in use: maintenance of facade components

The use of dwellings contributes significantly to human-induced environmental burden in a number of ways, including energy consumption and the maintenance and replacement of building components. The present study deals with the maintenance and replacement of external doors and windows in a Dutch reference dwelling and describes how life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology can be applied to quantitatively assess the environmental impact of various maintenance scenarios for the facade components. First, the most effective way to reduce the negative environmental impact in this context is to replace existing single and double glazing with high efficiency double glazing, thereby reducing energy consumption for space heating. Second, the use of timber frames causes less environmental impact than PVC frames with a steel core. Third, extending the service life of building components decreases the input of material resources, production processes and the waste processing of building components during the service life of a dwelling, which is beneficial to the environment. Maintenance activities should only be performed when needed, keeping the building components in good condition while minimising the transportation movements of maintenance workers. Finally, protecting timber components with an alternative paint that contains less solvent does not lower the assessed environmental impact, but low-solvent paint may be preferred because of health aspects both for maintenance workers and occupants of the dwelling.

[1]  Anna Forsberg,et al.  Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment , 2004 .

[2]  Laure Itard,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts of renovated housing stock with new construction , 2007 .

[3]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  LCA normalisation factors for the Netherlands, Western Europe and the World , 2001 .

[4]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[5]  Mary Stewart,et al.  A Consistent Framework for Assessing the Impacts from Resource Use - A focus on resource functionality (8 pp) , 2005 .

[6]  Tariq Muneer,et al.  Sustainability analysis of window frames , 2005 .

[7]  Mathias Borg,et al.  Generic LCA-methodology applicable for buildings, constructions and operation services: today practice and development needs , 2003 .

[8]  Gerda Klunder Sustainable Solutions for Dutch Housing: Reducing the Environmental Impacts of New And Existing Houses , 2005 .

[9]  Frank Werner,et al.  Wooden building products in comparative LCA: A literature review , 2007 .

[10]  Mathias Borg,et al.  A building sector related procedure to assess the relevance of the usage phase , 2003 .

[11]  Laan van Westenenk,et al.  Improvement of LCA characterization factors and LCA practice for metals , 2004 .

[12]  W.M.C. Beerepoot,et al.  Energy policy instruments and technical change in the residential building sector , 2007 .

[13]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Analysing the life-cycle energy of an Australian residential building and its householders , 2000 .

[14]  Roland Clift,et al.  The relative importance of transport in determining an appropriate sustainability strategy for food sourcing , 2006 .

[15]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  A proposal for the definition of resource equivalency factors for use in product life-cycle assessment , 1995 .

[16]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[17]  Frank Werner,et al.  Wooden building products in comparative LCA , 2007 .