Interaction of genotype × management on vegetative growth and weed suppression of aerobic rice

Abstract Water shortage in drought-prone rice-growing areas of the world is threatening conventional irrigated rice production systems, in which rice is transplanted into fields where standing water is maintained until harvest. Aerobic rice production systems, in which rice is grown as a direct-seeded upland crop without flooding, require less water than conventional systems, but the transition to aerobic rice systems is impeded by severe weed infestation. An environmentally friendly and less labor-intensive weed control method needs to be introduced to aerobic rice farmers. A study was conducted at the International Rice Research Institute in the 2003 wet season and 2004 dry season to evaluate the effects of genotype, seeding rate, seed priming and their interactions on vegetative growth, yield and weed suppression. Three contrasting aerobic rice genotypes differing in yield and weed-suppressive ability (WSA) were grown at three seeding rates (100, 300 and 500 viable seeds m −2 ) with or without seed priming under two weed management treatments (weed-free and weedy) in a split-plot design. In 2004, the overall weed pressure was higher than in 2003, and consequently treatment effects in this year were more distinct than in 2003. No significant interactions among the experimental factors were found for crop yield, weed biomass, leaf area index, tiller number and vegetative crop biomass. Raising seeding rate from 100 to 300 viable seeds m −2 resulted in a significant increase in yield and a decrease in weed biomass, whereas a further increase from 300 to 500 viable seeds m −2 did not result in a further improvement in yield and weed suppression. The stronger WSA of genotype Apo than that of genotypes IR60080-46A and IRAT 216 related to a stronger competitive ability of individual plants and a faster canopy closure (0.5–6 days earlier). The WSA of weakly competitive genotypes was partially compensated for by a higher seeding rate. Seed priming, which was only evaluated in 2003, accelerated emergence by 2 days and slightly enhanced early crop growth, but had no significant effect on yield and weed suppression. The present study suggests that combining a weed-suppressive genotype with an optimum seeding rate can serve as a tool to manage weeds.

[1]  J. Monteith,et al.  A Mathematical Function for Crop Growth Based on Light Interception and Leaf Area Expansion , 1990 .

[2]  W. R. Whalley,et al.  EFFECT OF ON-FARM SEED PRIMING ON EMERGENCE, GROWTH AND YIELD OF COTTON AND MAIZE IN A SEMI-ARID AREA OF ZIMBABWE , 2003, Experimental Agriculture.

[3]  T. Foin,et al.  Water‐Seeded Rice Cultivars Differ in Ability to Interfere with Watergrass , 2001 .

[4]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  Suppressing Weeds in Direct‐seeded Lowland Rice: Effects of Methods and Rates of Seeding , 2005 .

[5]  Hans W. Griepentrog,et al.  Increased density and spatial uniformity increase weed suppression by spring wheat , 2005 .

[6]  W. Roder,et al.  Slash-and-Burn Rice Systems in the Hills of Northern Lao PDR: Description, Challenges and Opportunities , 2001 .

[7]  Patrick D. Gerard,et al.  Seeding Rates for Stale Seedbed Rice Production in the Midsouthern United States , 2005 .

[8]  C.J.T. Spitters,et al.  An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. I. Estimation of competition effects , 1983 .

[9]  A. Hashem,et al.  Seed Size Variation and its Effects on Germination and Seedling Vigour in Rice , 1996 .

[10]  K. Kirkland,et al.  Appropriate Crop Seeding Rate When Herbicide Rate is Reduced1 , 2000, Weed Technology.

[11]  R. Naylor.  Herbicides in Asian rice: transitions in weed management. , 1996 .

[12]  A. Fischer,et al.  Herbicide-resistant Echinochloa oryzoides and E. phyllopogon in California Oryza sativa fields , 2000, Weed Science.

[13]  D. F. Cox,et al.  Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. , 1984 .

[14]  B. Fofana,et al.  Weed suppression ability of upland rice under low-input conditions in West Africa. , 2000 .

[15]  D. Harris,et al.  Adoption Study Of Seed Priming Technology In Upland Rice , 2005 .

[16]  T. Foin,et al.  Crop traits related to weed suppression in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L) , 2003, Weed Science.

[17]  Deirdre Lemerle,et al.  Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds , 2001 .

[18]  J. Monteith.  2 – DOES LIGHT LIMIT CROP PRODUCTION? , 1981 .

[19]  B. Bouman,et al.  Rice production in water-scarce environments , 2003 .

[20]  M. Mortimer,et al.  Growth traits of diverse rice cultivars under severe competition: implications for screening for competitiveness , 2003 .

[21]  P. Counce.  Asymptotic and Parabolic Yield and Linear Nutrient Content Responses to Rice Population Density1 , 1987 .

[22]  A. Fischer,et al.  Competitiveness of Rice Cultivars as a Tool for Crop-Based Weed Management , 2004 .

[23]  R. P. Robles,et al.  Analysis of competition between wet-seeded rice and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) using a response–surface model , 2004, Weed Science.

[24]  G. Clayton,et al.  Barley seeding rate influences the effects of variable herbicide rates on wild oat , 2001, Weed Science.

[25]  J. Murphy,et al.  Delayed Harvest Effect on Soft Red Winter Wheat in the Southeastern USA , 2006 .

[26]  P. S. Sodhi,et al.  ON-FARM SEED PRIMING IN SEMI-ARID AGRICULTURE: DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION IN MAIZE, RICE AND CHICKPEA IN INDIA USING PARTICIPATORY METHODS , 1999, Experimental Agriculture.

[27]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Effects of winter wheat cultivars and seed rate on the biological characteristics of naturally occurring weed flora , 2002 .

[28]  W. Schillinger,et al.  Seed priming winter wheat for germination, emergence, and yield , 2003 .

[29]  M. Becker,et al.  Seed priming enhances germination and seedling growth of barley under conditions of P and Zn deficiency , 2004 .

[30]  Lammert Bastiaans,et al.  Cultivar weed-competitiveness in aerobic rice : heritability, correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection in weed-free environments , 2006 .

[31]  Robert E. Blackshaw,et al.  Seeding rate, herbicide timing and competitive hybrids contribute to integrated weed management in canola (Brassica napus) , 2003 .

[32]  R. Barker,et al.  Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement , 2003 .

[33]  B. Courtois,et al.  Developing rice cultivars for high-fertility upland systems in the Asian tropics , 2006 .

[34]  D. Garrity,et al.  Differential Weed Suppression Ability in Upland Rice Cultivars , 1992 .

[35]  L. R. Oliver,et al.  Effect of Seeding Rate of Drilled Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max) on Seed Yield and Gross Profit Margin1 , 2001, Weed Technology.

[36]  J.H.J. Spiertz,et al.  Developing selection protocols for weed competitiveness in aerobic rice , 2006 .

[37]  Erich-Christian Oerke,et al.  Safeguarding production-losses in major crops and the role of crop protection , 2004 .