Coding of acoustic features for a single-channel tactile aid.

Measurements have been made on the discrimination of speech contrasts on the basis of single-channel vibrotactile presentation of a variety of speech-derived signals, coded as amplitude- and frequency-modulated pulse trains. Stimulation was at the index fingertip. The signals chosen for tactile presentation were the speech amplitude envelope, the voice fundamental frequency FO and the zero-crossing frequency in the 1.3-6.6 kHz band. "Two-feature' codings, which present two of these signals simultaneously (one coded as stimulus frequency and one coded as stimulus amplitude), were found to be no more effective than "single feature' codings which present only one signal (coded as both amplitude and frequency). Scores for consonant discrimination were highest for the single-feature coding of zero-crossing frequency, although differences between the codings were not, in general, significant. Scores for emphatic-stress discrimination were highest for the single-feature coding of F0, and this coding produced best results overall. A practical wrist-worn device, whose design is influenced by these experimental results is briefly described.

[1]  Charlotte M. Reed,et al.  Research on Tactual Communication of Speech: Ideas, Issues, and Findings. , 1989 .

[2]  A Boothroyd Perception of Speech Pattern Contrasts from Auditory Presentation of Voice Fundamental Frequency , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[3]  M C Martin,et al.  A tactile sound level monitor for the profoundly deaf. , 1980, British journal of audiology.

[4]  P J Blamey,et al.  Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  R Plomp,et al.  Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  L. Bernstein,et al.  Single-channel vibrotactile supplements to visual perception of intonation and stress. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  D M Howard,et al.  Peak-picking fundamental period estimation for hearing prostheses. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P J Blamey,et al.  Phonemic information transmitted by a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  P K Kuhl,et al.  The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  T Hnath-Chisolm,et al.  Tactile Presentation of Voice Fundamental Frequency as an Aid to the Perception of Speech Pattern Contrasts , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Carl E. Sherrick,et al.  Basic and applied research on tactile aids for deaf people: Progress and prospects , 1984 .

[12]  P J Blamey,et al.  A comparison of three speech coding strategies using an acoustic model of a cochlear implant. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B H Brown,et al.  Electrical stimulation at the wrist as an aid for the profoundly deaf. , 1983, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[14]  B H Brown,et al.  Vibrotactile and electrotactile perception of time-varying pulse trains. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  H. Traunmüller,et al.  The sentiphone: a tactual speech communication aid. , 1980, Journal of communication disorders.

[16]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  I. R. Summers,et al.  Choice of speech features for tactile presentation to the profoundly deaf , 1995 .