Accident Analysis and Prevention

This study examined whether speech-based interfaces for different in-vehicle-information-systems (IVIS) reduce the distraction caused by these systems. For three frequently used systems (audio, telephone with name selection, navigation system with address entry and point of interest selection) speech, manual control and driving without IVIS (baseline) were compared. The Lane Change Task was used to assess driving performance. Additionally, gaze behavior and a subjective measure of distraction were analyzed. Speech interfaces improved driving performance, gaze behavior and subjective distraction for all systems with the exception of point-of-interest entry. However, these improvements were overall not strong enough to reach the baseline performance level. Only in easy segments of the driving task the performance level was comparable to baseline. Thus, speech-based IVIS have to be further developed to keep the cognitive complexity at an adequate level which does not disturb driving. However, looking at the benefits, speech control is a must for the car of the future.

[1]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes , 2001 .

[2]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[3]  A. Hamish Jamson,et al.  Speech-Based E-Mail and Driver Behavior: Effects of an In-Vehicle Message System Interface , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[4]  J Lockhart,et al.  The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[6]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[7]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  NHTSA DRIVER DISTRACTION RESEARCH: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 2001 .

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Nick Reed,et al.  The effect of text messaging on driver behaviour: a simulator study , 2008 .

[10]  Timothy L. Brown,et al.  Speech-Based Interaction with In-Vehicle Computers: The Effect of Speech-Based E-Mail on Drivers' Attention to the Roadway , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  The role of driver inattention in crashes: new statistics from the 1995 crashworthiness data system , 1996 .