Shoulder belts in motor vehicle crashes: a statewide analysis of restraint efficacy.

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of shoulder belt use on motor vehicle crash ejection, morbidity and mortality. We analyzed motor vehicle crash records linked to hospital inpatient data for front seat occupants of passenger cars in Utah between 1994 and 1996 (n = 103,035). Stochastic simulations were used to adjust for possible seatbelt misclassification. There were 276 (0.3%) occupants coded as using only a shoulder belt. The adjusted odds of ejection for shoulder only belted occupants was higher compared to lap-shoulder belted (odds ratio (OR) = 18.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 15.1, 25.1) and lap only belted occupants (OR = 4.3; 95% Cl = 2.9, 7.7). There was no difference in the odds of ejection for an occupant using a shoulder belt only and an occupant using no seatbelt (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.0, 1.3). Occupants using a shoulder belt only were more likely to sustain a fatal or hospitalizing injury than lap-shoulder belted (OR = 2.3; 95% Cl = 1.9, 3.0), and lap only belted occupants (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.3, 2.7), while controlling for other covariates. Occupants using only a shoulder belt had the same odds of a fatal or hospitalizing injury as unbelted occupants (OR = 1.1; 95% Cl = 0.9, 1.4). Average hospital inpatient length of stay, charges and injury severity scores were similar for all restraint types. These results stress the need for the use of a lap belt in conjunction with the shoulder belt.

[1]  M C Frick,et al.  Potential fatality reductions through eliminating occupant ejection from cars. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  L S Robertson,et al.  The validity of self-reported behavioral risk factors: seatbelt and alcohol use. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  D C Viano,et al.  Car occupant safety in frontal crashes: a parameter study of vehicle mass, impact speed, and inherent vehicle protection. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  L Evans,et al.  Car mass and fatality risk: has the relationship changed? , 1994, American journal of public health.

[5]  S M Rock.  Risk compensation and the Illinois seat belt use law. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  C. Garbacz.  IMPACT OF THE NEW ZEALAND SEAT BELT LAW , 1991 .

[7]  L. Evans.  Safety-belt effectiveness: the influence of crash severity and selective recruitment. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  F M Streff,et al.  Are there really shortcuts? Estimating seat belt use with self-report measures. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  L. Evans,et al.  Restraint effectiveness, occupant ejection from cars, and fatality reductions. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  D W Reinfurt,et al.  Usage patterns and misuse rates of automatic seat belts by system type. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Matthew A. Jaro,et al.  Advances in Record-Linkage Methodology as Applied to Matching the 1985 Census of Tampa, Florida , 1989 .

[12]  L. Evans.  Risk of fatality from physical trauma versus sex and age. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  R. Maio,et al.  46. The Accuracy of Medical Records and Police Reports in Determining Motor Vehicle Crash Characteristics , 1996, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[14]  F M Streff,et al.  Effects of the 65 mph speed limit on injury morbidity and mortality. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  W. Evans,et al.  Risk reduction or risk compensation? The case of mandatory safety-belt use laws , 1991 .

[17]  P. Asch,et al.  Risk compensation and the effectiveness of safety belt use laws: a case study of New Jersey , 1991 .

[18]  V. Moore,et al.  VEHICLE SPEED AND RISK OF A SEVERE CRASH , 1995, Epidemiology.

[19]  L Evans,et al.  Motorized two-point safety belt effectiveness in preventing fatalities. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  K H Digges,et al.  Light vehicle occupant ejections--a comprehensive investigation. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  L. Robertson.  Reducing death on the road: the effects of minimum safety standards, publicized crash tests, seat belts, and alcohol. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[22]  F M Streff,et al.  Field effectiveness of two restraint systems: the 3-point manual belt versus the 2-point motorized-shoulder/manual lap belt. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  C E Nash,et al.  The effectiveness of automatic belts in reducing fatality rates in Toyota Cressidas. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.