The effect of information availability in a user interface (UI) on in-vehicle task performance: A pilot study

Abstract When performing an in-vehicle operation, the information display is a crucial element that decides the operator's control behaviors. The interaction between information presentation and operator's in-vehicle task performance is critical for vehicle safety. The question arises: What is the optimum availability of information? The aim of this study is to investigate the relationships between different information availabilities and operation performances as operators interact with an in-vehicle user interface (UI) to complete a simulated train driving task. The results show that some types of information significantly affect the operator's task performance. Information that improved the task performances were closely associated with specific task requirements. The participants' task performance indicated that they had a better awareness of a task situation and were better at controlling their virtual vehicle when completing time and process-restricted tasks with limited, relevant information. These results support the conclusion that more information does not always promote accuracy and safety during the task completion. Relevance to industry This study presents a unique insight into the information display of in-vehicle UI design for vehicle control. The information available within an in-vehicle interface should be optimized by performance assessments to provide more useful information; this has significant positive effect on operator performance from an accuracy and safety perspective. Thus, this study provides advice for designing an in-vehicle UI.

[1]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Driving and Side Task Performance: The Effects of Display Clutter, Separation, and Modality , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Michael G. Lenné,et al.  Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: a comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[4]  G Labiale COMPLEXITY OF IN-CAR VISUAL MESSAGES AND DRIVERS' PERFORMANCES , 1996 .

[5]  Cheri Speier,et al.  The influence of information presentation formats on complex task decision-making performance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Ming-Hui Wen,et al.  Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Yung-ching Liu Effects of using head-up display in automobile context on attention demand and driving performance , 2003 .

[8]  A. Todorov,et al.  The illusion of knowledge: When more information reduces accuracy and increases confidence , 2007 .

[9]  T M Allen,et al.  DRIVER INFORMATION NEEDS , 1971 .

[10]  R. Cumming Human information processing under varying task demand. , 1973, Ergonomics.

[11]  Andrew W. Gellatly,et al.  Visual Sampling of In-Vehicle Text Messages: Effects of Number of Lines, Page Presentation, and Message Control , 2005 .

[12]  Don N. Kleinmuntz,et al.  Information Displays and Decision Processes , 1993 .

[13]  Håkan Alm,et al.  Context adaptable driver information--or, what do whom need and want when? , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  James L. Szalma,et al.  Operator Stress and Display Design , 2003 .

[15]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Task-related information analysis , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .

[17]  James L. Szalma,et al.  Workload and Stress of Configural Displays in Vigilance Tasks , 2002 .

[18]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: an integration of the findings , 1986, CACM.

[19]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Display of Information for Time-Critical Decision Making , 1995, UAI.

[20]  Meeko M. K. Oishi Assessing information availability for user-interfaces of shared control systems under reference tracking , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[21]  Richard Halstead-Nussloch,et al.  Message-Based Screen Interfaces: The Effects of Presentation Rates and Task Complexity on Operator Performance , 1984 .

[22]  B L Cole,et al.  Evaluating the role of colour in a flight information cockpit display. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[23]  R. E. Dewar In-vehicle information and driver overload , 1988 .

[24]  C. O'Reilly Individuals and Information Overload in Organizations: Is More Necessarily Better? , 1980 .

[25]  Jennifer Crawford,et al.  A Review of the Perceptual and Cognitive Issues Associated With the Use of Head-Up Displays in Commercial Aviation , 2006 .

[26]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Tradeoffs in displaying peripheral information , 2000, CHI.

[27]  M. Fowkes Presenting information to the driver , 1984 .

[28]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[29]  John M. Findlay,et al.  The effects of the availability of menu information during command learning in a word processing application , 1989 .

[30]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance , 1980 .

[31]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  How much information do we need? , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Y C Liu,et al.  Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems , 2001, Ergonomics.

[33]  Xiaolu Dong,et al.  Effects of Information Organization and Presentation on Human Performance in Simulated Main Control Room Procedure Tasks , 2015 .