The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.

This review compared the accuracy of various approaches to the prediction of recidivism among sexual offenders. On the basis of a meta-analysis of 536 findings drawn from 118 distinct samples (45,398 sexual offenders, 16 countries), empirically derived actuarial measures were more accurate than unstructured professional judgment for all outcomes (sexual, violent, or any recidivism). The accuracy of structured professional judgment was intermediate between the accuracy found for the actuarial measures and for unstructured professional judgment. The effect sizes for the actuarial measures were moderate to large by conventional standards (average d values of 0.67-0.97); however, the utility of the actuarial measures will vary according to the referral question and samples assessed. Further research should identify the psychologically meaningfully factors that contribute to risk for reoffending. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  E. L. Kelly.  Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence. , 1955 .

[2]  J. Sawyer,et al.  Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  H. L. Kozol,et al.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Dangerousness , 1972 .

[5]  Lewis Yablonsky,et al.  Crime and Delinquency , 1975 .

[6]  Differential Processing of Abnormal Sex Offenders: Utilization of California's Mentally Disordered Sex Offender Program , 1976 .

[7]  D. Andrews.  Some Experimental Investigations of the Principles of Differential Association Through Deliberate Manipulations of the Structure of Service Systems , 1980 .

[8]  S. Brodsky.  Criminal Justice and Behavior , 1980 .

[9]  Judgments of dangerousness: An analysis of mental hospital decisions to release mentally disordered sex offenders. , 1983 .

[10]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[11]  J. S. Wormith,et al.  Preventive Detention in Canada , 1986 .

[12]  Wayne R. Smith,et al.  Assessing Juvenile Sexual Offenders' Risk for Reoffending , 1986 .

[13]  J. Swets.  Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  C. Webster,et al.  The Clinical Prediction of Dangerousness , 1987 .

[15]  R. Dawes,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment , 2002 .

[16]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[17]  W. Rowe,et al.  Juvenile Sex Offenders: A Follow-Up Study of Reoffense Behavior - Full Report , 1991 .

[18]  John C. Norcross,et al.  In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. , 1992 .

[19]  J. Prochaska,et al.  In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors , 1992, The American psychologist.

[20]  R. Steffy,et al.  Long-term recidivism of child molesters. , 1993, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

[21]  Antonio Andrés Pueyo,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT , 2008 .

[22]  Vernon L. Quinsey,et al.  The violence prediction scheme: Assessing dangerousness in high risk men. , 1994 .

[23]  L. Hedges,et al.  Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[25]  R. Slavin.  Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  Don Grubin,et al.  Sexual offence recidivism: Prediction versus understanding , 1996 .

[27]  James Bonta,et al.  Risk-needs assessment and treatment. , 1996 .

[28]  P. Gendreau,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE PREDICTORS OF ADULT OFFENDER RECIDIVISM: WHAT WORKS!* , 1996 .

[29]  Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers , 1996 .

[30]  J. Reddon,et al.  Phoenix: An Inhospital Treatment Program for Sex Offenders , 1996 .

[31]  James Bonta,et al.  The prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: A re-validation of the SIR scale. , 1996 .

[32]  Kirk Heilbrun,et al.  Prediction Versus Management Models Relevant to Risk Assessment: The Importance of Legal Decision-Making Context , 1997, Law and human behavior.

[33]  G. Harris,et al.  Cross-Validation and Extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for Child Molesters and Rapists , 1997, Law and human behavior.

[34]  J. Proulx,et al.  Static and Dynamic Predictors of Recidivism in Sexual Aggressors , 1997 .

[35]  Roxanne Lieb,et al.  Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State , 1997 .

[36]  Stephen D. Hart,et al.  The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues , 1998 .

[37]  R. K. Hanson,et al.  Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[38]  J. Bonta,et al.  The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  V. Quinsey,et al.  A Retrospective Evaluation of the Regional Treatment Centre Sex Offender Treatment Program , 1998 .

[40]  K. Heilbrun.  Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. , 1998 .

[41]  R. K. Hanson.  What do we know about sex offender risk assessment , 1998 .

[42]  Christopher D. Webster,et al.  Violence risk assessment: Science and practice , 1999 .

[43]  Alan T. Harland.  Choosing correctional options that work. Defining the demand and evaluation the supply. (Weber) , 1999 .

[44]  R. Prentky,et al.  An Actuarial Procedure for Assessing Risk with Juvenile Sex Offenders , 2000, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[45]  R. K. Hanson,et al.  Improving Risk Assessments for Sex Offenders: A Comparison of Three Actuarial Scales , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[46]  W. Grove,et al.  Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Psychological assessment.

[47]  B R Johnson.  Assessing the risk for violence. , 2000, New directions for mental health services.

[48]  Ten-Year Recidivism Follow-Up Of 1989 Sex Offender Releases , 2001 .

[49]  T. R. Litwack,et al.  Actuarial Versus Clinical Assessments Of Dangerousness , 2001 .

[50]  Validation of two standard risk assessments (RRASOR, 1997; STATIC-99, 1999) on a sample of adult males who are developmentally disabled with significant cognitive deficits , 2001 .

[51]  J. Worling,et al.  The "ERASOR" Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism , 2001 .

[52]  Niklas Långström,et al.  Actuarial Assessment of Sex Offender Recidivism Risk: A Cross-Validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden , 2001, Law and human behavior.

[53]  "Straught thinking on probation": evidence-based practice and the culture of curiosity , 2001 .

[54]  Constructing and Testing a Framework for Dynamic Risk Assessment , 2002 .

[55]  Niklas Långström,et al.  Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists: A Comparison of four different measures , 2002 .

[56]  A Comparison of Modified Versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide , 2002 .

[57]  D. Dawson,et al.  Developing a unique risk of violence tool for Australian Indigenous offenders , 2002 .

[58]  P. Firestone,et al.  A Comparison of Modified Versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide , 2002, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[59]  S. M. Hudson,et al.  Dynamic Risk Factors: The Kia Marama Evaluation , 2002, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[60]  A. Beech,et al.  Risk, reconviction rates and pro-offending attitudes for child molesters in a complete geographical area of London , 2002 .

[61]  R. Hood,et al.  Sex Offenders Emerging from Long-Term Imprisonment. A Study of Their Long-term Reconviction Rates and of Parole Board Members' Judgements of Their Risk , 2002 .

[62]  A. Beech,et al.  The Relationship Between Static and Dynamic Risk Factors and Reconviction in a Sample of U.K. Child Abusers , 2002, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[63]  D. Thornton.  Constructing and Testing a Framework for Dynamic Risk Assessment , 2002, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[64]  Eric S. Janus,et al.  Sexually coercive behavior : understanding and management , 2003 .

[65]  G. Harris,et al.  Actuarial Assessment of Risk among Sex Offenders , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Steven R. Gray,et al.  Differences in the Predictive Validity of Actuarial Risk Assessments in Relation to Sex Offender Type , 2003, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[67]  A. Beech,et al.  Evaluation of a National Prison-based Treatment Program for Sexual Offenders in England and Wales , 2003, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[68]  G. Harris,et al.  A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. , 2003, Psychological assessment.

[69]  Calvin M Langton.  Contrasting approaches to risk assessment with adult male sexual offenders: An evaluation of recidivism prediction schemes and the utility of supplementary clinical information for enhancing predictive accuracy. , 2003 .

[70]  The development and validation of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender version (VRS:SO) and its relationship to psychopathy and treatment attrition. , 2003 .

[71]  D. Thornton,et al.  Distinguishing and Combining Risks for Sexual and Violent Recidivism , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  LIFE‐COURSE DESISTERS? TRAJECTORIES OF CRIME AMONG DELINQUENT BOYS FOLLOWED TO AGE 70* , 2003 .

[73]  A comparison of actuarial methods of predicting sexual dangerousness. , 2004 .

[74]  Sex offender treatment : an evaluation of the Stave Lake Correctional Centre program , 2004 .

[75]  C. de Ruiter,et al.  Predictive Validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch Sample of Treated Sex Offenders , 2004, Law and human behavior.

[76]  D. Doren.  Stability of the Interpretative Risk Percentages for the RRASOR and Static-99 , 2004, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[77]  J. S. Wormith,et al.  The Predictive Validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Ontario Revision on General and Violent Recidivism among Various Offender Groups , 2004 .

[78]  Thomas Grisso,et al.  A Multiple-Models Approach to Violence Risk Assessment Among People with Mental Disorder , 2004 .

[79]  G. Dhaliwal,et al.  Refusers, Dropouts, and Completers: Measuring Sex Offender Treatment Efficacy , 2004, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[80]  Stability of the Interpretative Risk Percentages for the RRASOR and Static-99 , 2004 .

[81]  Gregory A. Parks.  Juvenile sex offender recidivism: Typological differences in risk assessment. , 2004 .

[82]  A follow-up study of sex offenders treated by Thames Valley Sex Offender Groupwork Programme, 1995–1999 , 2004 .

[83]  Niklas Långström.  Accuracy of Actuarial Procedures for Assessment of Sexual Offender Recidivism Risk May Vary Across Ethnicity , 2004, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[84]  D. Doren.  Toward a Multidimensional Model for Sexual Recidivism Risk , 2004, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[85]  N. Kleindienst,et al.  Risk assessment and prediction of violent and sexual recidivism in sex offenders: Long-term predictive validity of four risk assessment instruments , 2005 .

[86]  W. Marshall,et al.  Sexual Offender Treatment , 2005 .

[87]  Grant T. Harris,et al.  Comparing Effect Sizes in Follow-Up Studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r , 2005, Law and human behavior.

[88]  V. Quinsey,et al.  The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. , 2005, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[89]  Forensic Use of Actuarial Risk Assessment with Sex Offenders: Accuracy, Admissibility and Accountability , 2005 .

[90]  G. Cumming,et al.  Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. , 2005, The American psychologist.

[91]  Daryl G Kroner,et al.  A coffee can, factor analysis, and prediction of antisocial behavior: the structure of criminal risk. , 2005, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[92]  B. Francis,et al.  Identifying future repeat danger from sexual offenders against children: A focus on those convicted and those strongly suspected of such crime , 2005 .

[93]  A. Beech,et al.  Risk prediction and failure in a complete urban sample of sex offenders , 2005 .

[94]  M. Seto.  Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. , 2005, Psychological assessment.

[95]  Do psychological interventions impact on actuarial measures : an analysis of the predictive validity of the static-99 and static-2002 on a re-conviction measure of sexual recidivism , 2005 .

[96]  Denise C. Gottfredson,et al.  Long-term effects of participation in the Baltimore City drug treatment court: Results from an experimental study , 2006 .

[97]  J. Mills,et al.  The effect of discordance among violence and general recidivism risk estimates on predictive accuracy. , 2006, Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH.

[98]  Genna R. Cohen,et al.  The Meta-Analysis of Clinical Judgment Project: Fifty-Six Years of Accumulated Research on Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction , 2006 .

[99]  D. Mossman.  Another Look at Interpreting Risk Categories , 2006, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[100]  D. Dawson,et al.  Prediction of the risk of male sexual reoffending in Australia , 2006 .

[101]  R. Archer,et al.  A Survey of Psychological Test Use Patterns Among Forensic Psychologists , 2006, Journal of personality assessment.

[102]  B. Roberts,et al.  Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[103]  K. Naudts.  Evaluating Sex Offenders: A Manual for Civil Commitments and Beyond. Edited by Dennis M. Doren. Sage Publications, London EC2A 4PU, UK, May 2002, 242 pp. Hardback, ISBN 0-76192113-3. Paperback, ISBN 0-7619-2114-1 , 2006 .

[104]  R. Hanson.  Does Static-99 Predict Recidivism Among Older Sexual Offenders? , 2006, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[105]  D. A. Andrews,et al.  The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment , 2006 .

[106]  A. Beech,et al.  The relationship between risk, deviance, treatment outcome and sexual reconviction in a sample of child sexual abusers completing residential treatment for their offending , 2006 .

[107]  James L. Johnson.  Sex Offenders on Federal Community Supervision: Factors that Influence Revocation. , 2006 .

[108]  Catherine A. Cormier,et al.  Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk, 2nd ed. , 2006 .

[109]  Jan Looman.  Comparison of Two Risk Assessment Instruments for Sexual Offenders , 2006, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[110]  J. Vess,et al.  Assessing risk for sexual offenders in New Zealand: Development and validation of a computer-scored risk measure , 2006 .

[111]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony , 2006 .

[112]  Stephen C. P. Wong,et al.  An Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of the Criminal Sentiments Scale in a Sample of Treated Sex Offenders , 2006, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[113]  Calvin M. Langton,et al.  Different Actuarial Risk Measures Produce Different Risk Rankings for Sexual Offenders , 2006, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[114]  C. Ducro,et al.  Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian Sex Offenders Committed to a Forensic Facility , 2006, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[115]  Robin J. Wilson,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Professionally-Facilitated Volunteerism in the Community-Based Management of High-Risk Sexual Offenders: Part Two - A Comparison of Recidivism Rates , 2007 .

[116]  B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol—II (J-Soap-II) in a Sample of Urban Minority Youth , 2007 .

[117]  Circles of Support & Accountability: A National Replication of Outcome Findings , 2007 .

[118]  A comparison of an actuarial risk prediction measure (Static-99) and a stable dynamic risk prediction measure (Stable-2000) in making risk predictions for a group of sexual offenders. , 2007 .

[119]  La prédiction de la récidive chez les délinquants sexuels , 2007 .

[120]  P. Witt,et al.  Juvenile Risk Assessment Scale (JRAS): A Predictive Validity Study , 2007 .

[121]  K. Gore.  Adjusted actuarial assessment of sex offenders: The impact of clinical overrides on predictive accuracy , 2007 .

[122]  Assessing the Effectiveness of the National Sexual Offender Program , 2007 .

[123]  Leam A. Craig,et al.  The Relationship of Statistical and Psychological Risk Markers to Sexual Reconviction in Child Molesters , 2007 .

[124]  Accuracy of predictions of sexual offense recidivism: A comparison of actuarial and clinical methods. , 2007 .

[125]  J. D. Williams.  Juvenile sex offenders: Predictors of recidivism. , 2007 .

[126]  Unguided Clinical and Actuarial Assessment of Re-offending Risk: A Direct Comparison with Sex Offenders in Denmark , 2007, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[127]  Stephen C. P. Wong,et al.  The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. , 2007, Psychological assessment.

[128]  Sex Offender Recidivism in Minnesota , 2007 .

[129]  Developments in Social Work with Offenders , 2007 .

[130]  R. Grace,et al.  Psychometric Assessment of Dynamic Risk Factors for Child Molesters , 2007, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[131]  L. Webb,et al.  Characteristics of Internet Child Pornography Offenders: A Comparison with Child Molesters , 2007, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[132]  R. Jackson,et al.  Evaluation for Civil Commitment of Sex Offenders: A Survey of Experts , 2007, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[133]  Michael C. Seto,et al.  Actuarial Assessment of Risk for Reoffense Among Adult Sex Offenders , 2007 .

[134]  D. Ullman,et al.  Assessing Risk for Violence in Adolescents Who Have Sexually Offended , 2008 .

[135]  Meritxell Pérez Ramírez,et al.  Predicción de riesgo de reincidencia en agresores sexuales , 2008 .

[136]  R. Grace,et al.  Psychopathy, Intelligence, and Recidivism in Child Molesters , 2008 .

[137]  L. Webb,et al.  The Relationship Between Developmental Variables, Personality Disorder, and Risk in Sex Offenders , 2008, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[138]  Validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II. , 2008 .

[139]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[140]  P. Briken,et al.  Criminal Recidivism in Sexual Homicide Perpetrators , 2008, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[141]  F. Urbaniok,et al.  Accuracy of the Static-99 in Predicting Recidivism in Switzerland , 2009, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[142]  Robert J. McGrath,et al.  Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. , 2010 .

[143]  R. Grace,et al.  Assessment of Dynamic Risk Factors: An Independent Validation Study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version , 2010, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[144]  James Bonta,et al.  The psychology of criminal conduct, 5th ed. , 2010 .