Interactive behavioral technologies and diabetes self-management support: Recent research findings from clinical trials

A review of recent interactive behavioral technology (IBT) interventions applied to diabetes self-management identified 12 clinical trials, the majority being randomized controlled trials. Encouragingly, the studies used a wide range of technologies, were typically based in primary care settings, and mostly recruited disadvantaged or under-represented patients or those with little computer experience. However, only one third of the studies had incorporated behavioral theories or models into the interventions. Control conditions typically received some dose of the intervention or its components. Blood glucose control (A1c) was not significantly improved in 60% of studies, and where the intervention group was significantly improved over the control condition only modest improvements were found (−0.18% to 0.4%). Patientreported outcomes were encouraging, but weak attention to psychometrics (eg, responsiveness) was evident. Health care utilization was reduced for several uncontrolled studies. Future research should target patient motivation to participate more intensely and consistently and integrate IBT interventions into routine medical care.

[1]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  M. Driscoll.  Psychology of Learning for Instruction , 1993 .

[3]  Russell E. Glasgow,et al.  Making a Difference With Interactive Technology: Considerations in Using and Evaluating Computerized Aids for Diabetes Self-Management Education , 2001 .

[4]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. , 2002, JAMA.

[5]  Sheldon Cohen,et al.  Social support theory and measurement. , 2000 .

[6]  Benjamin H. Gottlieb,et al.  Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. , 2000 .

[7]  Britta Neugaard,et al.  An observational study of veterans with diabetes receiving weekly or daily home telehealth monitoring. , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  Denise B Ernst,et al.  Motivational Interviewing and Diabetes: What Is It, How Is It Used, and Does It Work? , 2006 .

[9]  Robert Ploutz-Snyder,et al.  A comparison of diabetes education administered through telemedicine versus in person. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[10]  Justin Starren,et al.  Research Paper: A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Self-management support in a web-based medical record: a pilot randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[12]  Garry Welch,et al.  Supporting Lifestyle Change With a Computerized Psychosocial Assessment Tool , 2002 .

[13]  Bert N. Uchino,et al.  The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[15]  J. C. Cherry,et al.  Diabetes disease management program for an indigent population empowered by telemedicine technology. , 2002, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Telecare for patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[17]  J. Piette,et al.  Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[18]  N. Chumbler,et al.  Evaluation of a Care Coordination/Home-Telehealth Program for Veterans with Diabetes , 2005, Evaluation & the health professions.

[19]  H Garth McKay,et al.  The D-Net diabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[20]  I. Rosenstock,et al.  Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model , 1988, Health education quarterly.

[21]  Michael L Berbaum,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a low-literacy diabetes education computer multimedia application. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[22]  Kathleenl N. Lohr,et al.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[23]  B. Levine,et al.  Impact of MyCareTeam for poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. , 2004, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.

[24]  Betty A Levine,et al.  Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[25]  D. Cox,et al.  Diabetes and behavioral medicine: the second decade. , 2002, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[27]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Psychological and Psychiatric Issues in Diabetes Mellitus , 2004 .

[28]  S. Rollnick,et al.  Innovation in clinical method: diabetes care and negotiating skills. , 1995, Family practice.

[29]  Alanna Kulchak Rahm,et al.  Randomized effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention to improve diabetes care. , 2005, Diabetes care.