Evolutionary Trace of G Protein-coupled Receptors Reveals Clusters of Residues That Determine Global and Class-specific Functions*

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation mediated by ligand-induced structural reorganization of its helices is poorly understood. To determine the universal elements of this conformational switch, we used evolutionary tracing (ET) to identify residue positions commonly important in diverse GPCRs. When mapped onto the rhodopsin structure, these trace residues cluster into a network of contacts from the retinal binding site to the G protein-coupling loops. Their roles in a generic transduction mechanism were verified by 211 of 239 published mutations that caused functional defects. When grouped according to the nature of the defects, these residues sub-divided into three striking sub-clusters: a trigger region, where mutations mostly affect ligand binding, a coupling region near the cytoplasmic interface to the G protein, where mutations affect G protein activation, and a linking core in between where mutations cause constitutive activity and other defects. Differential ET analysis of the opsin family revealed an additional set of opsin-specific residues, several of which form part of the retinal binding pocket, and are known to cause functional defects upon mutation. To test the predictive power of ET, we introduced novel mutations in bovine rhodopsin at a globally important position, Leu-79, and at an opsin-specific position, Trp-175. Both were functionally critical, causing constitutive G protein activation of the mutants and rapid loss of regeneration after photobleaching. These results define in GPCRs a canonical signal transduction mechanism where ligand binding induces conformational changes propagated through adjacent trigger, linking core, and coupling regions.

[1]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Combining inference from evolution and geometric probability in protein structure evaluation. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  L. Kavraki,et al.  An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  D. Oprian,et al.  Slow binding of retinal to rhodopsin mutants G90D and T94D. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[4]  D. Oprian,et al.  Characterization of rhodopsin congenital night blindness mutant T94I. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[5]  Didier Rognan,et al.  Protein‐based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of g‐protein coupled receptors suitable targets? , 2002, Proteins.

[6]  C. Gillberg,et al.  Why Bother About Clumsiness? The Implications of Having Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) , 2003, Neural plasticity.

[7]  G Vriend,et al.  Correlated Mutation Analyses on Very Large Sequence Families , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[8]  Peter L. Freddolino,et al.  Prediction of structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Prahlad T. Ram,et al.  G Protein Pathways , 2002, Science.

[10]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Structural clusters of evolutionary trace residues are statistically significant and common in proteins. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[12]  T K Attwood,et al.  Deriving structural and functional insights from a ligand-based hierarchical classification of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[13]  T. Sakmar,et al.  Rhodopsin: insights from recent structural studies. , 2002, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[14]  Olivier Lichtarge,et al.  Prediction and confirmation of a site critical for effector regulation of RGS domain activity , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[15]  David Landsman,et al.  Learning about addiction from the genome , 2001, Nature.

[16]  T. Blundell,et al.  Evolutionary trace analysis of TGF-beta and related growth factors: implications for site-directed mutagenesis. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[17]  Christopher A Reynolds,et al.  Dimerization and Domain Swapping in G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: A Computational Study , 2000, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[18]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  A regulator of G protein signaling interaction surface linked to effector specificity. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Saraste,et al.  FEBS Lett , 2000 .

[20]  D R Flower,et al.  Modelling G-protein-coupled receptors for drug design. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  D Fischer,et al.  Analysis of heregulin symmetry by weighted evolutionary tracing. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[22]  F. Fanelli,et al.  Activation mechanism of human oxytocin receptor: a combined study of experimental and computer-simulated mutagenesis. , 1999, Molecular pharmacology.

[23]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Similar structures and shared switch mechanisms of the beta2-adrenoceptor and the parathyroid hormone receptor. Zn(II) bridges between helices III and VI block activation. , 1999, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  Christian Le Gouill,et al.  Selective Modulation of Wild Type Receptor Functions by Mutants of G-Protein-coupled Receptors* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  L Pritchard,et al.  Evolutionary trace analysis of the Kunitz/BPTI family of proteins: functional divergence may have been based on conformational adjustment. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  S. O. Smith,et al.  Constitutive activation of opsin by mutation of methionine 257 on transmembrane helix 6. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[27]  G Vriend,et al.  The interaction of class B G protein-coupled receptors with their hormones. , 1998, Receptors & channels.

[28]  F E Cohen,et al.  Identification of functional surfaces of the zinc binding domains of intracellular receptors. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  D. Donnelly The arrangement of the transmembrane helices in the secretin receptor family of G‐protein‐coupled receptors , 1997, FEBS letters.

[30]  Brian K. Kobilka,et al.  Structural Instability of a Constitutively Active G Protein-coupled Receptor , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  H. Khorana,et al.  Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of Rhodopsin , 1996, Science.

[32]  J. Drews Genomic sciences and the medicine of tomorrow , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  S. Karnik,et al.  Modulation of GDP Release from Transducin by the Conserved Glu134-Arg135 Sequence in Rhodopsin* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Rhodopsin activation blocked by metal-ion-binding sites linking transmembrane helices C and F , 1996, Nature.

[35]  B. Kobilka,et al.  Transmembrane Regions V and VI of the Human Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Are Required for Constitutive Activation by a Mutation in the Third Intracellular Loop* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  Øyvind Edvardsen,et al.  A database of mutants and effects of site‐directed mutagenesis experiments on G protein‐coupled receptors , 1996, Proteins.

[37]  S. W. Lin,et al.  Specific tryptophan UV-absorbance changes are probes of the transition of rhodopsin to its active state. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[38]  F E Cohen,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved Galphabetagamma binding surfaces support a model of the G protein-receptor complex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Opsins with mutations at the site of chromophore attachment constitutively activate transducin but are not phosphorylated by rhodopsin kinase. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Structure and function of receptors coupled to G proteins. , 1994, Current opinion in cell biology.

[43]  Kolakowski Lf GCRDB: A G-PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR DATABASE , 1994 .

[44]  J. Baldwin The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein‐coupled receptors. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[45]  T K Attwood,et al.  Design of a discriminating fingerprint for G-protein-coupled receptors. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[46]  D. Oprian,et al.  Transducin activation by rhodopsin without a covalent bond to the 11-cis-retinal chromophore , 1991, Science.

[47]  H. Khorana,et al.  A single amino acid substitution in rhodopsin (lysine 248----leucine) prevents activation of transducin. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[48]  H. Khorana,et al.  Expression of a synthetic bovine rhodopsin gene in monkey kidney cells. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  E. Triphosphat,et al.  FEBS Letters , 1987, FEBS Letters.

[50]  A. Lesk,et al.  The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[51]  H. Khorana,et al.  Total synthesis of a gene for bovine rhodopsin. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  A. Sobel,et al.  The Journal of Biological Chemistry. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[53]  M. Hollander,et al.  Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. , 1977 .