Early Healing Events around Titanium Implant Devices with Different Surface Microtopography: A Pilot Study in an In Vivo Rabbit Model

In the present pilot study, the authors morphologically investigated sandblasted, acid-etched surfaces (SLA) at very early experimental times. The tested devices were titanium plate-like implants with flattened wide lateral sides and jagged narrow sides. Because of these implant shape and placement site, the device gained a firm mechanical stability but the largest portion of the implant surface lacked direct contact with host bone and faced a wide peri-implant space rich in marrow tissue, intentionally created in order to study the interfacial interaction between metal surface and biological microenvironment. The insertion of titanium devices into the proximal tibia elicited a sequence of healing events. Newly formed bone proceeded through an early distance osteogenesis, common to both surfaces, and a delayed contact osteogenesis which seemed to follow different patterns at the two surfaces. In fact, SLA devices showed a more osteoconductive behavior retaining a less dense blood clot, which might be earlier and more easily replaced, and leading to a surface-conditioning layer which promotes osteogenic cell differentiation and appositional new bone deposition at the titanium surface. This model system is expected to provide a starting point for further investigations which clarify the early cellular and biomolecular events occurring at the metal surface.

[1]  Vittoria Ottani,et al.  Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  M. Raspanti,et al.  Correlative Microscopy of Bone in Implant Osteointegration Studies , 2010, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[3]  D. D’Lima,et al.  An in vivo evaluation of bone response to three implant surfaces using a rabbit intramedullary rod model , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[4]  P. Tengvall,et al.  The effect of heat- or ultra violet ozone-treatment of titanium on complement deposition from human blood plasma. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[5]  U. Nannmark,et al.  In vivo gene expression in response to anodically oxidized versus machined titanium implants. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[6]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[8]  Koichi Matsuo,et al.  Osteoclast-osteoblast communication. , 2008, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[9]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  Alessandro Ruggeri,et al.  Influence of different implant surfaces on peri-implant osteogenesis: histomorphometric analysis in sheep. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  G. Carmeliet,et al.  Early trabecular bone healing around titanium implants: a histologic study in rabbits. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[12]  J. Hirsch,et al.  The role of whole blood in thrombin generation in contact with various titanium surfaces. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[13]  Andrew R. Dentino,et al.  Nine-to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part I: implant loss and associations to various factorsRoos-Jansåker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, et al (Kristianstad Univ, Sweden; Public Dental Health Service, Kristianstad, Sweden) J Clin Periodontol 33:283–289, 2006§ , 2007 .

[14]  G. Fumagalli,et al.  A New Chemical Etching Process to Improve Endosseous Implant Osseointegration: In Vitro Evaluation on Human Osteoblast-Like Cells , 2006, The International journal of artificial organs.

[15]  Stefan Renvert,et al.  Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part I: implant loss and associations to various factors. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  D. Seabold,et al.  Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  V. Ottani,et al.  Biological fixation of endosseous implants. , 2005, Micron.

[18]  B. Nilsson,et al.  Material-specific thrombin generation following contact between metal surfaces and whole blood. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[19]  V. Ottani,et al.  Osteogenesis and Morphology of the Peri-Implant Bone Facing Dental Implants , 2004, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[20]  N. Lang,et al.  Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  V. Ottani,et al.  Early detachment of titanium particles from various different surfaces of endosseous dental implants. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[22]  M. Raspanti,et al.  Different titanium surface treatment influences human mandibular osteoblast response. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  J. Davies,et al.  Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. , 2003, Journal of dental education.

[24]  Niklaus P Lang,et al.  De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[25]  C. Stanford,et al.  Effects of Implant Microtopography on Osteoblast Cell Attachment , 2003, Implant dentistry.

[26]  C. Gemmell,et al.  Platelet interactions with titanium: modulation of platelet activity by surface topography. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[27]  N. Fujii,et al.  Tissue response to titanium implants in the rat maxilla: ultrastructural and histochemical observations of the bone-titanium interface. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[28]  二見 隆行 Tissue response to titanium implants in the rat maxilla : ultrastructural and histochemical observations of the bone-titanium interface , 1999 .

[29]  L Sennerby,et al.  Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[30]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[31]  Lars Sennerby,et al.  Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone , 1993 .

[32]  P. Branemark,et al.  Clinical aspects of osseointegration in joint replacement. A histological study of titanium implants. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[33]  P. Branemark,et al.  Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses , 1970, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[34]  J Lindström,et al.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. , 1969, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.