Conditional Reasoning with Realistic Material

Four experiments are reported which investigated the types of truth tables that people associate with conditional sentences and the kinds of inferences that they will draw from them. The present studies differed from most previous ones in using different types of content in the conditionals, for example promises and warnings. It was found that the type of content had a strong and consistent effect on both truth tables and inferences. It is suggested that this is because in real life conditionals make probabilistic assertions, and that the strength of the probabilistic link is determined by the situation in which the conditional occurs. The implications of these findings for current theories of reasoning are considered and it is concluded that none of them is entirely satisfactory. It is suggested that more linguistically based theories may prove more successful.

[1]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  How implication is understood. , 1969 .

[2]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Proving a Disjunctive Rule , 1969 .

[3]  J. S. Evans,et al.  Interpretation and Matching Bias in a Reasoning Task , 1972 .

[4]  Samuel Fillenbaum,et al.  If: Some uses , 1975 .

[5]  Samuel Fillenbaum,et al.  Inducements: On the phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats, and warnings , 1976 .

[6]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  R. Byrne.  Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals , 1989, Cognition.

[8]  Todd Lubart,et al.  Conditional reasoning and causation , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Ruth M. J. Byrne,et al.  Can valid inferences be suppressed? , 1991, Cognition.

[10]  Martin D. S. Braine,et al.  Responses to inconsistent premisses cannot count as suppression of valid inferences , 1991, Cognition.

[11]  M. Braine,et al.  A Theory of If: A Lexical Entry, Reasoning Program, and Pragmatic Principles , 1991 .

[12]  M. Oaksford,et al.  Reasoning with conditionals containing negated constituents. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Nick Chater,et al.  A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. , 1994 .

[14]  Allen Newell,et al.  Deduction as verbal reasoning. , 1995 .

[15]  Christian George,et al.  The endorsement of the premises: Assumption‐based or belief‐based reasoning , 1995 .

[16]  B. Evans,et al.  Perspective Shifts on the Selection Task: Reasoning or Relevance? , 1995 .

[17]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Deduction from Uncertain Premises , 1995 .

[18]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .