Distribution and correlates of carnivore phylogenetic diversity across the Americas

Digital maps and a dated supertree of global carnivore species were used to assess the distribution of American carnivores' phylogenetic diversity (PD, measured in millions of years) both from a geopolitical perspective (‘evolutionary heritage’ or EH) and on the basis of species' range size and conservation status. A new measure, range‐weighted EH, is introduced. This measure partitions the total PD of the tree between countries based on the proportion of species' ranges within each country. Sociopolitical correlates of these measures were explored. Only 3% of the total PD in the Americas is endemic to any one country. As expected, the measures of PD are positively correlated with each other and with species richness. The USA contains the most species, the most EH and the second most range‐weighted EH after Brazil. Indeed, larger and richer countries, and those with the lowest state‐corruption‐rate hold most EH. No significant differences were observed in the amount of PD remaining if species are removed at random, or following more plausible sequences based on IUCN conservation status and range size. Eighty percent of the American carnivores' PD would remain safe if only the set of not threatened species were to remain. Roughly the same is true if only the 50% most widespread species were to persist. Samples of wide‐ranging species represent more of the entire tree than do samples of narrow‐ranging species, highlighting the importance of the former for conservation strategies. We suggest that similar approaches be applied to more groups across the globe to assess which countries and areas steward the most PD, as well as which species and taxa do, in order to plan conservation actions consequently.

[1]  M. Mares Neotropical Mammals and the Myth of Amazonian Biodiversity , 1992, Science.

[2]  Michael M. McKinney,et al.  Present and Future Taxonomic Selectivity in Bird and Mammal Extinctions , 1998 .

[3]  Andy Purvis,et al.  Hotspots and the conservation of evolutionary history , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Mark V. Lomolino,et al.  Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species , 2000, Nature.

[5]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[6]  T. O'Farrell,et al.  Evolutionary and Taxonomic Relationships among North American Arid-Land Foxes , 1990 .

[7]  Biodiversity , 1993, The Lancet.

[8]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Assessing Extinction Threats: Toward a Reevaluation of IUCN Threatened Species Categories , 1991 .

[9]  R. Crozier Preserving the Information Content of Species: Genetic Diversity, Phylogeny, and Conservation Worth , 1997 .

[10]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia) , 1999, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[11]  K. Gaston,et al.  Pattern and Process in Macroecology , 2000 .

[12]  C. Humphries,et al.  MEASURING BIODIVERSITY VALUE FOR CONSERVATION , 1995 .

[13]  Arne Ø. Mooers,et al.  Inferring Evolutionary Process from Phylogenetic Tree Shape , 1997, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[14]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Preserving the Tree of Life , 2003, Science.

[15]  A. Balmford,et al.  Phylogeny and the selectivity of extinction in Australian marsupials , 2002 .

[16]  A. Mooers,et al.  Phylogenetically patterned speciation rates and extinction risks change the loss of evolutionary history during extinctions , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Rob Channell,et al.  Trajectories to extinction: spatial dynamics of the contraction of geographical ranges , 2000 .

[18]  J. K. Jones Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991 / , 1992 .

[19]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  A comparison of taxonomic distinctness versus richness as criteria for setting conservation priorities for North American birds , 2001 .

[20]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. , 2000, Science.

[21]  Michael Taylor Diversity of life , 1994, Nature.

[22]  Kevin J. Gaston Biodiversity - measurement , 1994 .

[23]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The Future of Biodiversity , 1995, Science.

[24]  M. Walpole,et al.  Governance and the loss of biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[25]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  Foxes, Wolves, Jackals, and Dogs: An Action Plan for the Conservation of Canids , 1990 .

[26]  Robert M. May,et al.  Taxonomy as destiny , 1990, Nature.

[27]  Caroline Pollock,et al.  2000 IUCN red list of threatened species , 2000 .

[28]  K. Gaston Species richness : measure and measurement , 1996 .

[29]  D. Faith Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[30]  R M May,et al.  Extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. , 1997, Science.

[31]  José Alexandre,et al.  Phylogenetic Diversity and Conservation Priorities under Distinct Models of Phenotypic Evolution , 2004 .

[32]  K. Gaston,et al.  Geographic range size and evolutionary age in birds , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species , 2003, Nature.

[34]  R. García-Perea The Pampas cat group (genus Lynchailurus Severtzov, 1858) (Carnivora, Felidae) : a systematic and biogeographic review. American Museum novitates ; no. 3096 , 1994 .

[35]  Lisa C. Bradley,et al.  Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico , 1975 .

[36]  Kristofer M. Helgen,et al.  Mesozoic origin for West Indian insectivores , 2004, Nature.

[37]  K. Gaston,et al.  Rarity and Conservation Planning across Geopolitical Units , 2002 .

[38]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Predicting extinction risk in declining species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  K. Crandall,et al.  Biogeographic regionalization of Australia: assigning conservation priorities based on endemic freshwater crayfish phylogenetics , 2000 .

[40]  Arne Ø. Mooers,et al.  Phylogeny and Conservation: Evolutionary heritage as a metric for conservation , 2005 .

[41]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Do Conservationists and Molecular Biologists Value Differences between Organisms in the Same Way , 1994 .

[42]  F. V. Euler Selective extinction and rapid loss of evolutionary history in the bird fauna. , 2001 .

[43]  E. Wilson,et al.  Why Put a Value on Biodiversity , 1988 .

[44]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas , 2002 .

[45]  S. Heard INFERRING EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS FROM , 1997 .

[46]  A. Mooers,et al.  Indonesia's threatened birds: over 500 million years of evolutionary heritage at risk , 2003 .