An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA

Abstract Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a proactive risk assessment technique, which has been widely used by engineers to meet the safety and reliability requirements of processes, products, structures, services, and systems. The major aim of the FMEA technique is to rank the failure modes according to their risk levels and subsequent actions are performed to eliminate/mitigate their consequences. In a typical FMEA, for each failure mode, three risk factors, namely severity (S), occurrence (O) and detection (D) are evaluated and a risk priority number (RPN) is estimated by multiplying these risk factors. In recent years a significant effort has been underway and different approaches have been proposed to improve FMEA, to overcome its several drawbacks. We notice that there is a significant amount of literature based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, which have been solely aimed to improve the risk estimation process in FMEA by overcoming the drawbacks of the traditional FMEA technique. In this work, we propose a novel integrated MCDM approach by combining Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) with the modified Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Ideal Real Comparative Analysis (modified FMAIRCA). At first, we calculate the fuzzy relative importance between the risk factors by using the FAHP method and then we use those importance values in our proposed modified FMAIRCA to rank the failure modes according to their risk level. Our modified FMAIRCA method is computationally inexpensive and is able to provide more viable decisions. We consider a benchmark example in FMEA domain to validate the ability of our integrated approach and highlight the usefulness of the same. Further, we compare the ranking result with other MCDM methods - FVIKOR, FCOPRAS, FMOORA, FMABAC, FTOPSIS and sensitivity analysis is also performed to highlight the robustness of the proposed approach.

[1]  Silvia Carpitella,et al.  A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Wei Zheng,et al.  Failure Mode and Effects Analysis by Using the House of Reliability-Based Rough VIKOR Approach , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[3]  Kuei-Hu Chang,et al.  A novel general risk assessment method using the soft TOPSIS approach , 2015 .

[4]  Serafim Opricovic,et al.  Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  A new fuzzy methodology-based structured framework for RAM and risk analysis , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2017, International Journal of Production Economics.

[7]  Duško Tešić,et al.  A HYBRID FUZZY AHP-MABAC MODEL: APPLICATION IN THE SERBIAN ARMY – THE SELECTION OF THE LOCATION FOR DEEP WADING AS A TECHNIQUE OF CROSSING THE RIVER BY TANKS , 2018 .

[8]  Xinguo Ming,et al.  Failure modes and effects analysis using integrated weight-based fuzzy TOPSIS , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[9]  Tongdan Jin,et al.  MULTIPLE FAILURE MODES ANALYSIS AND WEIGHTED RISK PRIORITY NUMBER EVALUATION IN FMEA , 2011 .

[10]  Nan Liu,et al.  Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Renato A. Krohling,et al.  Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision making , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Ahmet Can Kutlu,et al.  Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Goutam Kumar Bose,et al.  Multi criteria FMECA for coal-fired thermal power plants using COPRAS-G , 2014 .

[14]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  A two-phase fuzzy AHP - fuzzy TOPSIS model for supplier evaluation in manufacturing environment , 2019 .

[15]  Hadi Ghaderi,et al.  Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[16]  Soumava Boral,et al.  A hybrid decision making framework for modified failure mode effects and criticality analysis , 2019, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.

[17]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[19]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty , 2016 .

[20]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment , 2014, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[21]  T. Senthilvelan,et al.  Failure detection and optimization of sugar mill boiler using FMEA and Taguchi method , 2013 .

[22]  Zhaojun Li,et al.  New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Yong Deng,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis based on D numbers and TOPSIS , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[24]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots , 2016 .

[25]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[26]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Application of interval valued fuzzy-rough numbers in multi-criteria decision making: The IVFRN-MAIRCA model , 2019, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research.

[27]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Improving Risk Evaluation in FMEA With Cloud Model and Hierarchical TOPSIS Method , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[28]  Chun-Nen Huang,et al.  A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Rita Almeida Ribeiro Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: A review and new preference elicitation techniques , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[30]  Mohammad A. Khalilzadeh,et al.  Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment , 2018, Safety Science.

[31]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Integrated Fuzzy AHP-Codas Framework for Maintenance Decision in Urea Fertilizer Industry , 2017 .

[32]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Using Cloud Model Theory and PROMETHEE Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[33]  Yung-Chia Chang,et al.  Enhancing FMEA assessment by integrating grey relational analysis and the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach , 2013 .

[34]  Antonella Certa,et al.  ELECTRE TRI-based approach to the failure modes classification on the basis of risk parameters: An alternative to the risk priority number , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[35]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre , 2018 .

[36]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[37]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R'AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry , 2018 .

[38]  Sanjay Kumar Chaturvedi,et al.  Criticality Assessment Models for Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[39]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[40]  Xinyang Deng,et al.  A new method in failure mode and effects analysis based on evidential reasoning , 2014, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management.

[41]  Umut Asan,et al.  Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Under Uncertainty: A Literature Review and Tutorial , 2016, Intelligent Decision Making in Quality Management.

[42]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[43]  Gökay Akkaya,et al.  An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MOORA approach to the problem of industrial engineering sector choosing , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Dragan Pamuar,et al.  Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers , 2017 .

[45]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  The Role of Façade Materials in Blast-Resistant Buildings: An Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy EDAS , 2019, Algorithms.

[46]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: A systematic literature review , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[47]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[48]  Zhang-peng Tian,et al.  An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[49]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure mode and effect analysis using MULTIMOORA method with continuous weighted entropy under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2016, Soft Computing.

[50]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..