The frequency scale of speech intonation.

In intonation research, prominence-lending pitch movements have either been described on a linear or on a logarithmic frequency scale. An experiment has been carried out to check whether pitch movements in speech intonation are perceived on one of these two scales or on a psychoacoustic scale representing the frequency selectivity of the auditory system. This last scale is intermediary between the other two scales. Subjects matched the excursion size of prominence-lending pitch movements in utterances resynthesized in different pitch registers. Their task was to adjust the excursion size in a comparison stimulus in such a way that it lent equal prominence to the corresponding syllable in a fixed test stimulus. The comparison stimulus and the test stimulus had pitches running parallel on either the logarithmic frequency scale, the psychoacoustic scale, or the linear frequency scale. In one-half of the experimental sessions, the test stimulus was presented in the low register, while the comparison stimulus was presented in the high register, and, conversely, for the other half of the sessions. The result is that, in all cases, stimuli are matched in such a way that the average excursion sizes in different registers are equal on the psychoacoustic scale.

[1]  E. B. Newman,et al.  A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch , 1937 .

[2]  Harvey b. Fletcher,et al.  Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .

[3]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Critical Band Width in Loudness Summation , 1957 .

[4]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands , 1961 .

[5]  D. D. Greenwood Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .

[6]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Analysis of Some Auditory Characteristics. , 1963 .

[7]  D. Klatt,et al.  Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Analytical expressions for critical‐band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency , 1980 .

[10]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception XI. Experimental results on the relation of intensity resolution to loudness matching. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. ’t Hart,et al.  Differential sensitivity to pitch distance, particularly in speech. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M. Liberman The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B. Moore,et al.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  A.C.M. Rietveld,et al.  On the relation between pitch excursion size and prominence , 1985 .

[15]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  T. M. Nearey Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the frequency discrimination of pulsed tones and the detection of frequency modulation , 1989 .

[18]  Eric Moulines,et al.  A diphone synthesis system based on time-domain prosodic modifications of speech , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[19]  H. Traunmüller Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale , 1990 .

[20]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[21]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.