Improved Computational Efficiency of Locally Low Rank MRI Reconstruction Using Iterative Random Patch Adjustments

This paper presents and analyzes an alternative formulation of the locally low-rank (LLR) regularization framework for magnetic resonance image (MRI) reconstruction. Generally, LLR-based MRI reconstruction techniques operate by dividing the underlying image into a collection of matrices formed from image patches. Each of these matrices is assumed to have low rank due to the inherent correlations among the data, whether along the coil, temporal, or multi-contrast dimensions. The LLR regularization has been successful for various MRI applications, such as parallel imaging and accelerated quantitative parameter mapping. However, a major limitation of most conventional implementations of the LLR regularization is the use of multiple sets of overlapping patches. Although the use of overlapping patches leads to effective shift-invariance, it also results in high-computational load, which limits the practical utility of the LLR regularization for MRI. To circumvent this problem, alternative LLR-based algorithms instead shift a single set of non-overlapping patches at each iteration, thereby achieving shift-invariance and avoiding block artifacts. A novel contribution of this paper is to provide a mathematical framework and justification of LLR regularization with iterative random patch adjustments (LLR-IRPA). This method is compared with a state-of-the-art LLR regularization algorithm based on overlapping patches, and it is shown experimentally that results are similar but with the advantage of much reduced computational load. We also present theoretical results demonstrating the effective shift invariance of the LLR-IRPA approach, and we show reconstruction examples and comparisons in both retrospectively and prospectively undersampled MRI acquisitions, and in T1 parameter mapping.

[1]  J. Pauly,et al.  Accelerating parameter mapping with a locally low rank constraint , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Mathews Jacob,et al.  Accelerated Dynamic MRI Exploiting Sparsity and Low-Rank Structure: k-t SLR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  R Dony,et al.  Karhunen-Loève Transform , 2000 .

[4]  Daniel K Sodickson,et al.  Low‐rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Spatiotemporal imaging with partially separable functions: A matrix recovery approach , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[6]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Low-rank approximations for dynamic imaging , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[7]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Low rank matrix recovery for real-time cardiac MRI , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[8]  Michael Unser,et al.  Hessian Schatten-Norm Regularization for Linear Inverse Problems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Michael Elad,et al.  Calibrationless parallel imaging reconstruction based on structured low‐rank matrix completion , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Joshua D. Trzasko,et al.  Exploiting local low-rank structure in higher-dimensional MRI applications , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[11]  A. Manduca,et al.  Local versus Global Low-Rank Promotion in Dynamic MRI Series Reconstruction , 2010 .

[12]  A. Majumdar Improved dynamic MRI reconstruction by exploiting sparsity and rank-deficiency. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  S. Holland,et al.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Wotao Yin,et al.  A fast patch-dictionary method for whole image recovery , 2014, ArXiv.

[15]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Calibrationless parallel MRI using CLEAR , 2011, 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[16]  V. Magnotta,et al.  Accelerated whole‐brain multi‐parameter mapping using blind compressed sensing , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  Accelerated MR parameter mapping with low‐rank and sparsity constraints , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Klaas Paul Pruessmann,et al.  A Fast Wavelet-Based Reconstruction Method for Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  James Demmel,et al.  Fast $\ell_1$ -SPIRiT Compressed Sensing Parallel Imaging MRI: Scalable Parallel Implementation and Clinically Feasible Runtime , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  k-t FASTER: Acceleration of functional MRI data acquisition using low rank constraints , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Angshul Majumdar,et al.  Exploiting rank deficiency and transform domain sparsity for MR image reconstruction. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Non-local sparse models for image restoration , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[23]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  A Singular Value Thresholding Algorithm for Matrix Completion , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[24]  Michael Lustig,et al.  Fast pediatric 3D free‐breathing abdominal dynamic contrast enhanced MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  A. Lewis The Convex Analysis of Unitarily Invariant Matrix Functions , 1995 .

[26]  Jing Yuan,et al.  PANDA‐ T1ρ : Integrating principal component analysis and dictionary learning for fast T1ρ mapping , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Efficient L1/Lq Norm Regularization , 2010, ArXiv.

[28]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[29]  Michael Unser,et al.  Variational Justification of Cycle Spinning for Wavelet-Based Solutions of Inverse Problems , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[30]  M. Lustig,et al.  Improved pediatric MR imaging with compressed sensing. , 2010, Radiology.

[31]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Four‐dimensional, multiphase, steady‐state imaging with contrast enhancement (MUSIC) in the heart: A feasibility study in children , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Kurt Keutzer,et al.  Practical parallel imaging compressed sensing MRI: Summary of two years of experience in accelerating body MRI of pediatric patients , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.