Selection for profit in cattle: II. Economic weights for dairy and beef sires in crossbreeding systems.

The relative economic importance (economic weights) of 18 traits was determined for Holstein and Charolais sires used in a dairy production system applying cross-breeding with beef sires and in a cow-calf pasture cross-breeding system with integrated fattening of surplus animals. A bioeconomic model containing a profit function was used for the calculations in both systems. Discounted expressions for direct and maternal components of the traits during an investment period of 25 yr were calculated using the gene-flow technique. The relative economic weights for some traits or trait components of the dairy sires differed substantially between the purebred and crossbred dairy systems. There were also meaningful differences among the relative economic weights of traits for beef sires, depending on whether these bulls were used for terminal crossing with F1 females in the cow-calf pasture system (back-crossing), for crossing in dairy herds producing slaughter animals, or for crossing in dairy herds producing F1 females for the cow-calf pasture system. We therefore recommend construction of specific sets of subindices for dairy and beef sires to allow users to rank the bulls according to expected merit of their progeny in specific production systems.

[1]  J. Kvapilík,et al.  Selection for profit in cattle: I. Economic weights for purebred dairy cattle in the Czech Republic. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  H. Hirooka,et al.  Economic efficiency of Japanese Black cattle selection schemes utilizing crossbreeding with the Holstein breed , 2006 .

[3]  D. Berry,et al.  Cumulative discounted expressions of dairy and beef traits in cattle production systems , 2006 .

[4]  J. Wolf,et al.  Breeding objectives for beef cattle used in different production systems: 1. Model development , 2005 .

[5]  J. Wolf,et al.  Breeding objectives for beef cattle used in different production systems , 2005 .

[6]  P. Carnier,et al.  Definition of a breeding goal for the Piemontese breed: economic and biological values and their sensitivity to production circumstances. , 2004 .

[7]  P. Berg,et al.  Stochastic simulation of economic values and their standard deviations for production and functional traits in dairy cattle under current and future danish production circumstances , 2004 .

[8]  G. Nitter,et al.  Relative economic weights of maternal versus direct traits in breeding schemes , 2004 .

[9]  G. Simm,et al.  A bio-economic model for the evaluation of breeds and mating systems in beef production enterprises , 2003 .

[10]  A. Alçiçek,et al.  Feedlot Performance and Slaughter Traits of Friesian, Piemontese x Friesian and Limousin x Friesian Young Bulls under Intensive Beef Production System in Turkey , 2003 .

[11]  J. Wilton,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF RANKINGS OF BEEF SIRES FOR NON-LINEAR MULTIPLE TRAIT BREEDING OBJECTIVES , 2002 .

[12]  G. Simm,et al.  Breeding objectives for beef cattle in Ireland , 2001 .

[13]  G. Renand,et al.  Developing a breeding objective for a French purebred beef cattle selection programme 1 3rd submissi , 1998 .

[14]  J. Urioste,et al.  Breeding objectives for pasture-fed Uruguayan beef cattle , 1998 .

[15]  M. MacNeil,et al.  Relative economic values for Canadian beef production using specialized sire and dam lines , 1994 .

[16]  B. Cottrill,et al.  Energy and protein requirements of ruminants: an advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients , 1993 .

[17]  M. Davies,et al.  Evaluation of piemontese-cross friesian steers and heifers on silage-based diets , 1992 .

[18]  W. G. Hill.  Prediction and evaluation of response to selection with overlapping generations , 1974 .