The Four Seasons: Identification of Seasonal Effects in LMS usage data

Learning Management Systems (LMSs) are widely used by organizations to provide and manage educational activities. Particularly in higher education, the application of LMS platforms is well documented and evaluated in the literature for at least one decade, whereby evaluation is often restricted to user-oriented analysis of the acceptance, usefulness and usability and rarely relies on real data-sets. Previous research revealed that the usage patterns of web users and mobile users highly depend on the time period within a semester. Therefore, this paper specifically addresses the question how to identify and compare seasonal effects on the basis of an anonymized data-set. After proposing an Educational Data Mining based method for analyzing log files of LMS platforms and elaborating related work, we report a case study in which we compare the usage behavior of four different seasons. It shows that not only the intensity of platform usage but also certain activities of LMS users are highly dependent on the season. Moreover, seasons can be characterized e.g. through rank/frequency plots of n-grams or principal components of the browsing sessions in the period of time. The paper provides evidence that the detection of seasonal effects can be used for improving the navigation structures and personalization of LMS systems.

[1]  Felix Mödritscher Beyond collaborative filtering: generating local top-n recommendations for personal learning environments , 2011, i-KNOW '11.

[2]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[3]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Identifying Students' Characteristic Learning Behaviors in an Intelligent Tutoring System Fostering Self-Regulated Learning , 2012, EDM.

[4]  Daniel S. Soper,et al.  An n-gram analysis of Communications 2000--2010 , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[5]  Jakki J. Mohr,et al.  Uses, Limitations, and Trends in Web Analytics , 2009 .

[6]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Identifying Learning Behaviors by Contextualizing Differential Sequence Mining with Action Features and Performance Evolution , 2012, EDM.

[7]  M. E. J. Newman,et al.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[8]  Alfred Kobsa User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[9]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Handbook of Research on Web Log Analysis , 2008 .

[10]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[11]  Bayan Abu Shawar Learning Management System and its Relationship with Knowledge Management , 2004 .

[12]  Jaideep Srivastava,et al.  Web usage mining: discovery and applications of usage patterns from Web data , 2000, SKDD.

[13]  Markus Koppenberger,et al.  Topology of music recommendation networks. , 2006, Chaos.

[14]  Mark Strembeck,et al.  A User Profile Derivation Approach based on Log-File Analysis , 2007, IKE.

[15]  Sushil Jajodia,et al.  Secure Data Management in Decentralized Systems , 2014, Secure Data Management in Decentralized Systems.

[16]  M. Newman Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[17]  Tariq M. Khan,et al.  The relationship between educational performance and online access routines: analysis of students' access to an online discussion forum , 2012, LAK '12.

[18]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[19]  Larry Johnson,et al.  The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. , 2012 .

[20]  Arnon Hershkovitz,et al.  Online persistence in higher education web-supported courses , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  Gilles Venturini,et al.  SIA: A Supervised Inductive Algorithm with Genetic Search for Learning Attributes based Concepts , 1993, ECML.

[22]  Gustaf Neumann,et al.  Comparing LMS Usage Behavior of Mobile and Web Users , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[23]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Handbook of Research on Web Log Analysis , 2009 .