Rapid, Object-Based Learning in the Deployment of Transient Attention

We show that transient attention summoned by an exogenous cue shows rapid learning of the relationship between the cue and a subsequent target in a discrimination task. In experiment 1, performance was unaffected when a target always appeared in the same position on a large cue, but was degraded when the target could appear anywhere within the extent of the larger cue. Experiment 2 shows that it was not the predictability of where the target appeared within the cue that aided performance, but rather a consistent location mapping of cue and target, since predictably alternating the target location relative to the cue led to worse performance than when the target was presented in the same location relative to the cue from trial to trial. Further analysis of the results of experiment 2 shows that the learning is rapid, evident after one trial, and has a cumulative influence over four consecutive trials. Possible neural correlates of this form of learning are discussed, with a focus on the supplementary eye fields in the prefrontal cortex. The reported experiments show that transient attention is not a simple reflexive mechanism but can show rapid visuospatial learning, in object-based coordinates.

[1]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .

[3]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[4]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Orienting of Visual Attention , 1992 .

[5]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[7]  S. Wise,et al.  Neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field during acquisition of conditional oculomotor associations. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  W. Levick,et al.  Properties of sustained and transient ganglion cells in the cat retina , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[12]  A. Sumich,et al.  Spatial Orienting Controlled without Awareness: A Semantically Based Implicit Learning Effect , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Robert M. McPeek,et al.  Saccades require focal attention and are facilitated by a short-term memory system , 1999, Vision Research.

[15]  Neelam Naikar,et al.  A new component of visual orienting: Implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention , 1999 .

[16]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[17]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  S. Yantis Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .

[19]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[20]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  C R Olson,et al.  Object-centered direction selectivity in the macaque supplementary eye field , 1995, Science.

[22]  J. Lauwereyns,et al.  Exogenous/Endogenous Control of Space-based/ Object-based Attention: Four Types of Visual Selection? , 1998 .

[23]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[24]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[25]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[26]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  A. Lambert,et al.  Effects of informative peripheral cues on eye movements: Revisiting William James’ “derived attention” , 2000 .

[29]  P. Lennie Parallel visual pathways: A review , 1980, Vision Research.

[30]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Object-Centered Attentional Biases in the Intact Brain , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  C. Olson,et al.  Representation of object-centered space in the primate frontal lobe. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  J Miller,et al.  Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.