Benefit-cost analysis of variable pricing projects : Quickride HOT lanes

Researchers identified a potential methodology for obtaining the incremental societal costs and benefits from a variable pricing project and applied that methodology to the QuickRide high occupancy/toll HOT lanes in Texas. This is one of the longest running variable pricing projects in the United States and, as such, it provided useful historical data and trends upon which to estimate future benefits and costs. This analysis found that the incremental societal benefits of QuickRide exceeded incremental societal costs for the time period considered. A companion paper that used the same methodology to examine the benefits and costs of the SR-91 Express Lanes found similar results. However, the differences between the benefits and costs were dramatically different for the two projects, indicative of the relative size of the two projects and the number of travelers impacted. On SR-91, tens of thousands of travelers were impacted on a daily basis where QuickRide's impact was limited to approximately 400 travelers per day. Interestingly, the benefit-cost ratios of the two projects were similar, both between 1.5 and 1.7. DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733-947X2006132:3183 CE Database subject headings: Benefit cost ratios; Pricing; Tolls; High occupancy vehicles; Texas; Traffic management.

[1]  A. A. Walters,et al.  The Economics of Road User Charges. , 1970 .

[2]  K. Small Using the revenues from congestion pricing , 1992 .

[3]  T. D. Hau ECONOMIC FUNDAMENTALS OF ROAD PRICING: A DIAGRAMMATIC ANALYSIS. POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER , 1992 .

[4]  Todd Litman,et al.  Using Road Pricing Revenue: Economic Efficiency and Equity Considerations: , 1996 .

[5]  James H. Banks Introduction to Transportation Engineering , 1997 .

[6]  C. Winston,et al.  The value of automobile travel time: implications for congestion policy , 1998 .

[7]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  Road Pricing for Congestion Management: The Transition from Theory to Policy - eScholarship , 1998 .

[8]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  VALUATION OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS AND PREDICTABILITY IN CONGESTED CONDITIONS FOR HIGHWAY USER-COST ESTIMATION , 1999 .

[9]  I. Parry,et al.  Revenue Recycling and the Welfare Effects of Road Pricing , 1999 .

[10]  M. Delucchi ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES OF MOTOR-VEHICLE USE IN THE US. IN: THE AUTOMOBILE , 2000 .

[11]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Measurement of the Valuation of Travel Time Savings , 2000 .

[12]  J. Bates,et al.  The valuation of reliability for personal travel , 2001 .

[13]  M. Barth,et al.  Recent Validation Efforts for a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model , 2001 .

[14]  Agachai Sumalee,et al.  Specification of Optimal Cordon Pricing Locations and Charges , 2002 .

[15]  D. Schrank,et al.  THE 2004 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT , 2002 .

[16]  Les Mayhew,et al.  OPTIMIZING THE BENEFITS OF URBAN ROAD USER CHARGING , 2002 .

[17]  David M Levinson Financing Transportation Networks , 2002 .

[18]  M. Burris,et al.  DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS OF TRAVELER PARTICIPATION IN DIFFERENTIAL TIME OF DAY PRICING PROGRAMS , 2002 .

[19]  Mark W Burris,et al.  Equity Analysis of the Houston, Texas, QuickRide Project , 2003 .

[20]  Georgina Santos,et al.  Distributional impacts of road pricing: The truth behind the myth , 2004 .

[21]  T. D. Hau ECONOMIC FUNDAMENTALS OF ROAD PRICING: A DIAGRAMMATIC ANALYSIS, PART I—FUNDAMENTALS , 2005 .

[22]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  On the Costs of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles , 2018, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.