Validation of FLACS against experimental data sets from the model evaluation database for LNG vapor dispersion

Abstract The siting of facilities handling liquefied natural gas (LNG), whether for liquefaction, storage or regasification purposes, requires the hazards from potential releases to be evaluated. One of the consequences of an LNG release is the creation of a flammable vapor cloud, that may be pushed beyond the facility boundaries by the wind and thus present a hazard to the public. Therefore, numerical models are required to determine the footprint that may be covered by a flammable vapor cloud as a result of an LNG release. Several new models have been used in recent years for this type of simulations. This prompted the development of the “ Model evaluation protocol for LNG vapor dispersion models ” (MEP): a procedure aimed at evaluating quantitatively the ability of a model to accurately predict the dispersion of an LNG vapor cloud. This paper summarizes the MEP requirements and presents the results obtained from the application of the MEP to a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model – FLACS. The entire set of 33 experiments included in the model validation database were simulated using FLACS. The simulation results are reported and compared with the experimental data. A set of statistical performance measures are calculated based on the FLACS simulation results and compared with the acceptability criteria established in the MEP. The results of the evaluation demonstrate that FLACS can be considered a suitable model to accurately simulate the dispersion of vapor from an LNG release.

[1]  Donald L. Ermak,et al.  Falcon series data report: 1987 LNG vapor barrier verification field trials , 1990 .

[2]  Olav R. Hansen,et al.  Consequence analysis—Using a CFD model for industrial sites , 2005 .

[3]  Mathieu Ichard,et al.  CFD model simulation of dispersion from chlorine railcar releases in industrial and urban areas , 2009 .

[4]  Michael Schatzmann,et al.  The SMEDIS database and validation exercise , 2001 .

[5]  Donald L. Ermak,et al.  Heavy Gas Dispersion Test Summary Report , 1989 .

[6]  Prankul Middha,et al.  CFD calculations of gas leak dispersion and subsequent gas explosions: validation against ignited impinging hydrogen jet experiments. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  A. Meager,et al.  EC (European Communities) Workshop on Human Somatic Gene Therapy September 23-24, 1993, Sponsored by the Commission of the European Communities Directorate--General XII for Science, Research and Development , 1994 .

[8]  Nicholas P. Cheremisinoff,et al.  Handbook of heat and mass transfer , 1986 .

[9]  T. G. McRae,et al.  Analysis of Burro series 40-m3 lng spill experiments , 1982 .

[10]  Olav R. Hansen,et al.  CFD-Modeling of LNG Dispersion Experiments , 2007 .

[11]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Hazardous gas model evaluation with field observations , 1993 .

[12]  Edward Bullister,et al.  Application of CFD (Fluent) to LNG spills into geometrically complex environments. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  Olav R. Hansen,et al.  FLACS CFD air quality model performance evaluation with Kit Fox, MUST, Prairie Grass, and EMU observations , 2004 .

[14]  Frank P. Incropera,et al.  Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer , 1981 .

[15]  J. McQuaid.  Heavy gas dispersion trials at Thorney Island : proceedings of a symposium held at the University of Sheffield, Great Britain, 3-5 April, 1984 , 1985 .

[16]  Julia E. Flaherty,et al.  Evaluation study of building-resolved urban dispersion models , 2007 .

[17]  W. Rohsenow.  A Method of Correlating Heat-Transfer Data for Surface Boiling of Liquids , 1952, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[18]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[19]  J. S. Puttock,et al.  Field experiments on dense gas dispersion , 1982 .

[20]  Jerry Havens,et al.  LNG vapor cloud exclusion zones for spills into impoundments , 2005 .

[21]  Søren Ott,et al.  A collection of data from dense gas experiments , 1995 .