How to perform magnetic resonance imaging on patients with implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices.

H t M a m i i n h m ( 0 c ntroduction agnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers unrivaled soft issue resolution and multiplanar imaging capabilities. Cariac MRI is capable of accurate characterization of cardiac unction and is uniquely capable of identifying scar fibrosis nd fat deposition, thus making it an ideal imaging modality or the evaluation of patients presenting with arrhythmia. In ddition, the absence of x-ray radiation makes MRI suitable or follow-up of chronic disease and for imaging in young atients and women of childbearing age. Due to the ever xpanding indications for implantation of permanent paceakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), dvancing severity of disease and age of the population, and dvances in device technology, the number of patients with mplantable cardiac devices will continue to increase. It has een estimated that each patient with a pacemaker or ICD as a 50% to 75% likelihood of having a clinical indication or MRI over the lifetime of their device. When performed ith appropriate supervision and following a protocol for afety, many studies over the past 10 years have reported the afety of MRI with selected devices. However, catastrophic omplications with older devices have been reported. Failiarity with each device class and its potential for elecromagnetic interaction is essential for electrophysiologists hose patients may require MRI.

[1]  B. Wilkoff,et al.  Safe Scanning, but Frequent Artifacts Mimicking Bradycardia and Tachycardia During Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Patients with an Implantable Loop Recorder (ILR) , 2005, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[2]  Henry R. Halperin,et al.  Modern Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Systems Can Be Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe: In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Safety and Function at 1.5 T , 2004, Circulation.

[3]  D. Bluemke,et al.  Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention , 2007, Circulation.

[4]  K Bachmann,et al.  Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. , 1997, American heart journal.

[5]  H. Halperin,et al.  Clinical Utility and Safety of a Protocol for Noncardiac and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillators at 1.5 Tesla , 2006, Circulation.

[6]  B Lüderitz,et al.  Interference with Cardiac Pacemakers by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Are There Irreversible Changes at 0.5 Tesla? , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  B L Wilkoff,et al.  Safe Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Five Patients with Permanent Cardiac Pacemakers , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[8]  J Leal Del Ojo,et al.  Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe in Cardiac Pacemaker Recipients? , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  J Gieseke,et al.  MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. , 2000, Radiology.

[10]  Emanuel Kanal,et al.  Outcome of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Selected Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[11]  Harold Litt,et al.  Strategy for Safe Performance of Extrathoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla in the Presence of Cardiac Pacemakers in Non–Pacemaker-Dependent Patients: A Prospective Study With 115 Examinations , 2006, Circulation.

[12]  Ronald D Berger,et al.  Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[13]  Robert Fair,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.