Interactive Online Module Failed to Improve Sustained Knowledge of the Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form.

RATIONALE Legal documents similar to the Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form requiring physician endorsement are increasingly used by critically ill patients. OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether an interactive, online training module on completion and interpretation of the MOLST form leads to a sustained increase in knowledge among house staff. METHODS Pre/post survey of 329 house staff at Johns Hopkins Hospital who admit and discharge patients between June 2014 and July 2015. House staff were encouraged to complete a voluntary, interactive, online educational module on completing and interpreting MOLST forms. Participants received $25 for accessing the module and $10 for completing each survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was the change in the number of questions answered correctly on the post- versus presurvey comparing house staff who viewed the module for at least 20 minutes with house staff who never viewed or never completed the module. Overall, 329 (69%) house staff completed the knowledge assessment survey both before and after the module was available, and 201 (61%) of these house staff completed the voluntary module. The median score on the presurvey conducted in July and August of 2014 was 14 out of 21 (interquartile range [IQR] 12, 16). The median (IQR) score on the postsurvey conducted in May and June of 2015 was 15 out of 21 (13, 17). The median (IQR) change in score among those who spent at least 20 minutes completing the module was 1 question (-1, 3), and among those who never viewed or never completed the module it was also 1 (IQR -1, 2). The postsurvey was completed a median (IQR) of 59 (52, 62) days after viewing the module. After adjusting for years of postgraduate clinical training, self-reported baseline experience completing MOLST forms, and self-reported responsibility for discharging patients, viewing the module for at least 20 minutes was associated with a nonsignificant increase in score of 0.41 questions (95% confidence interval, -0.25, 1.06; P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS An interactive, online educational module had no effect on trainee knowledge of completing and interpreting MOLST forms approximately 2 months after completion. Information conveyed via online modules alone may have minimal sustained impact on house staff knowledge.

[1]  M. Gong,et al.  Let's Talk Critical. Development and Evaluation of a Communication Skills Training Program for Critical Care Fellows. , 2015, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[2]  A. Back,et al.  The Critical Care Communication project: improving fellows' communication skills. , 2015, Journal of critical care.

[3]  T. Cooney,et al.  TRIAD VI: How Well Do Emergency Physicians Understand Physicians Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Forms? , 2015, Journal of patient safety.

[4]  T. Cooney,et al.  TRIAD VII: Do Prehospital Providers Understand Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Documents? , 2015, Journal of patient safety.

[5]  R. Ziegelstein,et al.  Implementing a graduate medical education campaign to reduce or eliminate potentially wasteful tests or procedures. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[6]  Joy V Goldsmith,et al.  Assessment of an interprofessional online curriculum for palliative care communication training. , 2014, Journal of palliative medicine.

[7]  Hossam Hamdy,et al.  Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83 , 2013, Medical teacher.

[8]  Alexander K. Smith,et al.  The diverse landscape of palliative care clinics. , 2013, Journal of palliative medicine.

[9]  S. Ross,et al.  Death is not always a failure: outcomes from implementing an online virtual patient clinical case in palliative care for family medicine clerkship , 2013, Medical education online.

[10]  E. Szmuilowicz,et al.  Code status discussion skill retention in internal medicine residents: one-year follow-up. , 2012, Journal of palliative medicine.

[11]  E. Szmuilowicz,et al.  Improving residents' code status discussion skills: a randomized trial. , 2012, Journal of palliative medicine.

[12]  Dana M. Zive,et al.  POLST Registry do-not-resuscitate orders and other patient treatment preferences. , 2012, JAMA.

[13]  Allard J van der Beek,et al.  Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[14]  Dale D Berg,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Program to Strengthen First Year Residents’ Proficiency in Leading End-of-Life Discussions , 2011, The American journal of hospice & palliative care.

[15]  J. Holley,et al.  Residents’ Practices and Perceptions About Do Not Resuscitate Orders and Pronouncing Death: An Opportunity for Clinical Training , 2011, The American journal of hospice & palliative care.

[16]  Y. Skrobik,et al.  Residents' End-of-Life Decision Making with Adult Hospitalized Patients: A Review of the Literature , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[17]  C. Kollas Exploring internal medicine chief residents' medicolegal knowledge. , 1997, The Journal of legal medicine.

[18]  N. Albert,et al.  Retention of Baseline Electrocardiographic Knowledge After a Blended-Learning Course. , 2016, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.