Empowering political participation through artificial intelligence

Technologies based on artificial intelligence (AI) can radically change the existing political paradigm, empowering more diffused forms of political participation beyond elections—especially in the emergent worldwide context of unrestricted disclosure of governmental data online. The objective of this research is to investigate how civil society can use AI-based technologies to empower political participation. A sample of 721 publications was conducted through a combination of bibliometric analysis and systematic review, which revealed the characteristics and the nascent state of literature. This was followed by an exploratory Case Study, conducted through in-depth interviews and participant observation and supplemented by secondary materials. The content of the Case Study was extensively and systematically analysed through textual coding. We depicted a framework of how civil society can use AI-based technologies to nurture diffused political participation. This framework scrutinizes six focal areas and their respective dominant traits and descriptive features, aiming at contributing to guiding academic studies and political endeavours.

[1]  C. Pateman.  Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[2]  E. F. Schumacher,et al.  Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered , 1974 .

[3]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence , 1974, IFIP Congress.

[4]  C. B. Macpherson,et al.  The life and times of liberal democracy , 1978 .

[5]  Pamela McCorduck,et al.  Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence , 1979 .

[6]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[7]  S. Agate,et al.  Small is beautiful , 2003, English Today.

[8]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[9]  Isma'il ibn Ali al-Sadiq.  AIDS , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[11]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[12]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[13]  Thomas Ross.  Machines who think. , 1933, Science.

[14]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[15]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[16]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[17]  Ulrich W. Eisenecker,et al.  AI: The Tumultuous History of the Search for Artificial Intelligence , 1995 .

[18]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy , 1996 .

[19]  B. Barber.  Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy , 1998 .

[20]  A. Oswald,et al.  What Makes an Entrepreneur? , 1998, Journal of Labor Economics.

[21]  Laurie Williams,et al.  The costs and benefits of pair programming , 2001 .

[22]  P. David,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ECONOMY OF THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY , 2001 .

[23]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class : And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life , 2003 .

[24]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[25]  E. Millstone.  Can food safety policy-making be both scientifically and democratically legitimated? If so, how? , 2007 .

[26]  Keith C. C. Chan,et al.  Pair programming productivity: Novice-novice vs. expert-expert , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[28]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[29]  Sally J. McMillan,et al.  Evaluation of Internet Advertising Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Citations from Key Sources , 2008 .

[30]  N. D. Bellis.  Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics , 2009 .

[31]  F. Berkhout,et al.  Learning to listen: institutional change and legitimation in UK radioactive waste policy , 2009 .

[32]  H. Chesbrough.  Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers , 2010 .

[33]  Ank Michels.  Innovations in democratic governance: how does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? , 2011 .

[34]  Petra Wächter.  Thinking in systems – a primer , 2011 .

[35]  Eric Ries,et al.  The lean startup : how constant innovation creates radically successful businesses , 2011 .

[36]  Sonstiges.  Corruption Perceptions Index , 2011 .

[37]  James A. Robinson,et al.  Why nations fail ? The origins of Power , Prosperity and Poverty , 2015 .

[38]  Deepak Khemani.  A Perspective on AI Research in India , 2012, AI Mag..

[39]  Diana Wright,et al.  Thinking in systems: a primer , 2012 .

[40]  Barry O'Sullivan,et al.  Sustainable Policy Making: A Strategic Challenge for Artificial Intelligence , 2014, AI Mag..

[41]  S. Reznik,et al.  Introduction to economy , 2015 .

[42]  Jouni Ikonen,et al.  Cloud-based bibliometric analysis service for systematic mapping studies , 2015, CompSysTech '15.

[43]  Philip N. Howard,et al.  Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational Propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum , 2016, ArXiv.

[44]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion , 2016, First Monday.

[45]  Bence Kollanyi,et al.  Automation, Algorithms, and Politics| Where Do Bots Come From? An Analysis of Bot Codes Shared on GitHub , 2016 .

[46]  Samuel C. Woolley,et al.  Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics , 2016, First Monday.

[47]  P. Howard,et al.  Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational Propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum , 2016, ArXiv.

[48]  B. Mittelstadt.  Auditing for Transparency in Content Personalization Systems , 2016 .

[49]  Spyros Makridakis,et al.  The Forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) Revolution: Its Impact on Society and Firms , 2017 .

[50]  D. Archibugi,et al.  The Internal and External Levers to Achieve Global Democracy , 2017 .

[51]  Michael Chui,et al.  Artificial intelligence: the next digital frontier? , 2017 .

[52]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election , 2017, First Monday.

[53]  R. Guilbeault.  No . 2017 . 5 Computational Propaganda in the United States of America : Manufacturing Consensus Online , 2017 .

[54]  S. Bradshaw,et al.  Troops, Trolls and Troublemakers: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation , 2017 .

[55]  e-traces,et al.  The great British Brexit robbery : how our democracy was hijacked | Technology | The Guardian - e-traces , 2017 .

[56]  P. Savaget,et al.  Plurality in understandings of innovation, sociotechnical progress and sustainable development: An analysis of OECD expert narratives , 2018, Public understanding of science.

[57]  Marco Aurélio Ruediger,et al.  Bots, social networks and politics in Brazil , 2018 .

[58]  P. Rekacewicz.  Corruption Perceptions Index, 2017 , 2018 .

[59]  E. Hafen,et al.  Will Democracy Survive Big Data and Artificial Intelligence? , 2017, Towards Digital Enlightenment.