A Robust Method for Beam-to-Beam contact Problems Based on a Novel Tunneling Constraint

Author(s): Repupilli, Massimiliano | Advisor(s): Taciroglu, Ertugrul; Ghoniem, Nasr | Abstract: The need for better and more efficient computational methods to model the mechanics of contact has increasingly attracted the interest of researchers in this area over the last two decades. Contact problems--wherein two or more bodies meet through an interface--are extremely challenging from both mathematical and engineering points of view, because of the complex nonlinearities due to moving contact interfaces. Over the years, a significant effort has been devoted to address the resolution of continuum contact using the finite element method through several techniques including penetration functions, mortar methods, and domain decomposition. Nonetheless, a comparable effort to resolve beam contact problems is still lacking in the current literature. Motivated by a number of deficiencies encountered in existing models for beam contact, this dissertation concerns the finite element modeling of contact among structural beams of zero thickness undergoing large deformations in space. The resulting methods and algorithms provide an unprecedented range of applicability in simulating not only contact of thin structural beams, but also collisions of cables (e.g., knot tying and surgical thread simulations), and dislocation dynamics, among others. The prevailing contact modeling techniques rely on a gap penetration constraint that is enforced by a penalty method to resolve overlapping between two or more contacting beams. Early attempts to resolve this problem, however, have displayed two major drawbacks: not only would the said constraint function be not extendable to planar beam contact problems, but also it would break down when dealing with zero thickness structural elements (e.g., thin beams, cables, and ropes). It was also observed that the existing formulations are difficult to implement and, often, computationally inefficient. Moreover, the use of the penalty method, which dominates most of the existing literature available to date, leads to failures in preserving the exact resolution of contact and, sometimes, results in ill conditioned problems. Especially within a large scale system involving multiple contacting bodies, if the penalty approximation is too crude, then the simulations may predict non physical outcomes. In this dissertation, a robust approach that is based on a novel contact constraint is proposed. This approach allows a simple and unified treatment of possible beam contact scenarios in two and three dimensional problems involving large deformations; and is based on a Lagrange multiplier method to exactly enforce the contact constraint across the interfaces between beam element pairs. Simply based on the calculation of an oriented volume/area, the proposed approach possesses the ability to resolve any contact scenario exactly and efficiently, while being relatively easy to implement and more widely applicable than the few beam contact formulations available to date. The primary focus of this work is the inner workings of the novel beam contact formulation proposed and, then, the delineation of the details of its numerical implementation in a finite element method setting. Application of the new approach is demonstrated through several benchmark problems, where specific consideration is given to the assessment of its robustness. The verification and assessment studies indicate that the proposed model can successfully resolve beam to beam contact with high fidelity for a broad spectrum of scenarios, wherein existing methods usually fail. The lessons learned from this study may be applied to resolving line contact in a wide range of areas including structural mechanics, textile mechanics, and dislocation dynamics. They may serve as a useful tool for developing efficient and accurate numerical models to simulate anything from progressive collapse of structures under extreme event scenarios and crushing of foams, to modeling of knots or surgical threads, just to name a few. An incidental aim of this work has been to make the mechanics of beam contact a more accessible topic of learning.

[1]  S. Kyriakides,et al.  On the crushing of aluminum open-cell foams: Part II analysis , 2009 .

[2]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  Geometrically exact 3D beam theory: implementation of a strain-invariant finite element for statics and dynamics , 1999 .

[3]  Kamran Iqbal,et al.  Collision detection: A survey , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[4]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials and Design: The Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design , 2002 .

[5]  E. A. Repetto,et al.  Finite element analysis of nonsmooth contact , 1999 .

[6]  M. Wolcott Cellular solids: Structure and properties , 1990 .

[7]  Gouri Dhatt,et al.  Incremental displacement algorithms for nonlinear problems , 1979 .

[8]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  A 3D beam‐to‐beam contact finite element for coupled electric–mechanical fields , 2005 .

[9]  T N Bitzer,et al.  Honeycomb Technology: Materials, Design, Manufacturing, Applications and Testing , 1997 .

[10]  Giorgio Zavarise,et al.  Contact with friction between beams in 3‐D space , 2000 .

[11]  Przemysław Litewka,et al.  Smooth Frictional Contact between Beams in 3D , 2007 .

[12]  Steen Krenk Non-linear Modeling and Analysis of Solids and Structures: Finite rotations , 2009 .

[13]  Keith Hjelmstad,et al.  A finite element formulation of non-smooth contact based on oriented volumes for quadrilateral and hexahedral elements , 2007 .

[14]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Mortar based frictional contact formulation for higher order interpolations using the moving friction cone , 2006 .

[15]  Christer Ericson,et al.  Real-Time Collision Detection , 2004 .

[16]  Stelios Kyriakides,et al.  Compressive response of open cell foams part II: Initiation and evolution of crushing , 2005 .

[17]  Bauchau Olivier,et al.  Flexible Multibody Dynamics , 2010 .

[18]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  A comparison of finite elements for nonlinear beams: the absolute nodal coordinate and geometrically exact formulations , 2008 .

[19]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Frictionless 2D Contact formulations for finite deformations based on the mortar method , 2005 .

[20]  J. Banhart Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams , 2001 .

[21]  M. Crisfield An arc‐length method including line searches and accelerations , 1983 .

[22]  R. Taylor,et al.  A mixed formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems , 1992 .

[23]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  Strategies for Tracing the Nonlinear Response Near Limit Points , 1981 .

[24]  Giorgio Zavarise,et al.  The node-to-segment algorithm for 2D frictionless contact: Classical formulation and special cases , 2009 .

[25]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[26]  Tod A. Laursen,et al.  Two dimensional mortar contact methods for large deformation frictional sliding , 2005 .

[27]  T. Laursen Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics , 2003 .

[28]  O. C. Zienkiewicz Incremental displacement in non-linear analysis , 1971 .

[29]  Jean-Louis Batoz,et al.  On the role of geometrically exact and second-order theories in buckling and post-buckling analysis of three-dimensional beam structures , 1996 .

[30]  Hsueh-Chun Lin,et al.  On Saint-Venant’s Problem for an Inhomogeneous, Anisotropic Cylinder—Part I: Methodology for Saint-Venant Solutions , 2001 .

[31]  C. Kanzow,et al.  An Active Set-Type Newton Method for Constrained Nonlinear Systems , 2001 .

[32]  Yeong-bin Yang,et al.  Solution method for nonlinear problems with multiple critical points , 1990 .

[33]  E. Riks An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems , 1979 .

[34]  Siegfried F. Stiemer,et al.  Improved arc length orthogonality methods for nonlinear finite element analysis , 1987 .

[35]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects , 1986 .

[36]  L. Kollár,et al.  Structural Stability in Engineering Practice , 1999 .

[37]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A monolithic smoothing‐gap algorithm for contact‐impact based on the signed distance function , 2002 .

[38]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Computational Contact Mechanics , 2002 .

[39]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics , 2013 .

[40]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  A note on the optimum choice for penalty parameters , 1987 .

[41]  Jing-Zhong Zhang,et al.  World Scientific , 2007 .

[42]  P. Wriggers Nonlinear Finite Element Methods , 2008 .

[43]  Tomas Akenine-Möller,et al.  Fast, Minimum Storage Ray-Triangle Intersection , 1997, J. Graphics, GPU, & Game Tools.

[44]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Contact between 3D beams with rectangular cross‐sections , 2002 .

[45]  Mokhtar S. Bazaraa,et al.  Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms , 1993 .

[46]  S. B. Dong,et al.  A method of analysis for end and transitional effects in anisotropic cylinders , 2010 .

[47]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  A note on tangent stiffness for fully nonlinear contact problems , 1985 .

[48]  Carme Torras,et al.  3D collision detection: a survey , 2001, Comput. Graph..

[49]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  On Regularization of the Convergence Path for the Implicit Solution of Contact Problems , 2011 .

[50]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[51]  M. Puso,et al.  A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics , 2004 .

[52]  G. Wempner Discrete approximations related to nonlinear theories of solids , 1971 .

[53]  P. M. Naghdi,et al.  On the theory of rods. I. Derivations from the three-dimensional equations , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[54]  P. Wriggers,et al.  On contact between three-dimensional beams undergoing large deflections , 1997 .

[55]  K. Bathe,et al.  Large displacement analysis of three‐dimensional beam structures , 1979 .

[56]  Damien Durville,et al.  Numerical simulation of entangled materials mechanical properties , 2005 .

[57]  M. Géradin,et al.  A beam finite element non‐linear theory with finite rotations , 1988 .

[58]  J. Oden,et al.  Contact Problems in Elasticity: A Study of Variational Inequalities and Finite Element Methods , 1987 .

[59]  Damien Durville,et al.  Simulation of the mechanical behaviour of woven fabrics at the scale of fibers , 2010 .

[60]  Tod A. Laursen,et al.  A segment-to-segment mortar contact method for quadratic elements and large deformations , 2008 .

[61]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Collision Detection: Algorithms and Applications , 1996 .

[62]  Alexander Konyukhov,et al.  Geometrically exact covariant approach for contact between curves , 2010 .

[63]  Gabriel Zachmann,et al.  Collision Detection for Deformable Objects , 2004, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[64]  Ming C. Lin,et al.  Collision Detection between Geometric Models: A Survey , 1998 .

[65]  E. Reissner On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: The plane problem , 1972 .

[66]  F S Manuel,et al.  LARGE DEFLECTIONS AND STABILITY OF ELASTIC FRAMES , 1968 .

[67]  David Harmon,et al.  Asynchronous contact mechanics , 2009, SIGGRAPH 2009.

[68]  Theodore H. H. Pian,et al.  Variational Formulation of Finite-Displacement Analysis, , 1971 .

[69]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  A note on numerical computation of elastic contact problems , 1975 .