Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials. Keynote presentation.

Abstract Large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) have become a major concern for land use sustainability at a global scale. A considerable body of case studies has shown that the livelihood outcomes of LSLAs vary, but the understanding of factors and processes that generate these livelihood outcomes remains controversial and fragmented in terms of cases, contexts, and normative orientations. Therefore, this study presents a meta-analysis of case studies and applies the archetypes approach developed in global change research to analyse the configurations of factors and processes that generate different livelihood outcomes in LSLA situations. The analysis is based on 44 systematically selected studies covering 66 cases in 21 countries in Africa, Latin America, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe. The results show that LSLAs affect rural livelihoods through a small set of archetypical configurations. Adverse livelihood outcomes arise most frequently from processes of (1) enclosure of livelihood assets, (2) elite capture, (3) selective marginalisation of people already living in difficult conditions, and (4) polarisation of development discourses, and less frequently from (5) competitive exclusion, (6) agribusiness failure, and (7) transient jobs. The processes are activated in specific configurations of social-ecological factors. Moving beyond diagnosis, the paper identifies archetypical potentials for safeguarding or enhancing sustainable livelihoods in LSLA target regions at multiple levels of decision-making. Finally, we analyse how contextual factors modify these general insights. This paper helps to advance the archetypes methodology for use in global change research that aims at integral analysis of recurrent patterns expressed in local manifestations. The results can be used to better link local case studies with regional and global inventories of the global land rush.

[1]  Hafiz Mirza,et al.  The practice of responsible investment principles in larger-scale agricultural investments : implications for corporate performance and impact on local communities , 2014 .

[2]  Nicholas R. Magliocca,et al.  Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[3]  G. Veldwisch,et al.  The evolution of the land struggle for smallholder irrigated rice production in Nante, Mozambique , 2012 .

[4]  E. Lambin,et al.  Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation , 2002 .

[5]  L. Cotula,et al.  Testing Claims about Large Land Deals in Africa: Findings from a Multi-Country Study , 2014 .

[6]  N. Dao.  Rubber plantations in the Northwest: rethinking the concept of land grabs in Vietnam , 2015 .

[7]  E. Lambin,et al.  Dynamic Causal Patterns of Desertification , 2004 .

[8]  L. German,et al.  Biofuel Investments in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A Review of the Early Legal and Institutional Framework in Zambia , 2012 .

[9]  David Fig,et al.  The politics of agrofuels and mega-land and water deals: insights from the ProCana case, Mozambique , 2011 .

[10]  Carsten Walther,et al.  Categorisation of typical vulnerability patterns in global drylands , 2011 .

[11]  N. Porro,et al.  Coercive Harmony in Land Acquisition: The Gendered Impact of Corporate “Responsibility” in the Brazilian Amazon , 2014 .

[12]  K. Nolte.  Large-Scale Agricultural Investments under Poor Land Governance Systems: Actors and Institutions in the Case of Zambia , 2013 .

[13]  Bernhard Ganter,et al.  Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations , 1998 .

[14]  S. Borras,et al.  Global Land Grabbing and Trajectories of Agrarian Change: A Preliminary Analysis , 2012 .

[15]  G. Schoneveld.  The Challenge of Governing Africa’s New Agricultural Investment Landscapes: An Analysis of Policy Arrangements and Sustainability Outcomes in Ethiopia and Nigeria , 2014 .

[16]  N. Mamonova.  Resistance or adaptation? Ukrainian peasants’ responses to large-scale land acquisitions† , 2015 .

[17]  Madelene Ostwald,et al.  Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Small-Scale Farmers Land-use change , 2007 .

[18]  Eld,et al.  Signi fi cance of Telecoupling for Exploration of Land-Use Change , 2013 .

[19]  Klaus Eisenack,et al.  Alleviating barriers to urban climate change adaptation through international cooperation , 2014 .

[20]  S. Vermeulen,et al.  Over the heads of local people: consultation, consent, and recompense in large-scale land deals for biofuels projects in Africa , 2010 .

[21]  Kieran Gilfoy.  Land grabbing and NGO advocacy in Liberia: A deconstruction of the ‘homogeneous community’ , 2015 .

[22]  C. Ashley,et al.  Sustainable livelihoods: lessons from early experience. , 1999 .

[23]  I. Scoones,et al.  The politics of evidence: methodologies for understanding the global land rush , 2013 .

[24]  Till Sterzel,et al.  A new method for analysing socio-ecological patterns of vulnerability , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[25]  F. Kizito,et al.  Water implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Ghana. , 2012 .

[26]  Christoph Oberlack,et al.  Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change , 2017, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[27]  I. Baird.  The Global Land Grab Meta-Narrative, Asian Money Laundering and Elite Capture: Reconsidering the Cambodian Context , 2014 .

[28]  T. Homer-Dixon.  Environment, Scarcity, and Violence , 2010 .

[29]  A. Amsalu,et al.  Local Perceptions about the Effects of Jatropha ( Jatropha curcas ) and Castor ( Ricinus communis ) Plantations on Households in Ghana and Ethiopia , 2014 .

[30]  G. Schoneveld.  The politics of the forest frontier: negotiating between conservation, development, and indigenous rights in Cross River State, Nigeria , 2014 .

[31]  Laura German,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Local, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Biofuels Land-based Investments for Rural Development? A Grounded Analysis of the Local Impacts of Biofuel Feedstock Plantations in Ghana , 2011 .

[32]  M. Kenney‐Lazar.  Plantation rubber, land grabbing and social-property transformation in southern Laos , 2012 .

[33]  K. Eisenack.  Archetypes of Adaptation to Climate Change , 2012 .

[34]  G. Vargas,et al.  Armed conflict, land grabs and primitive accumulation in Colombia: micro processes, macro trends and the puzzles in between , 2015 .

[35]  Matthias G. Will,et al.  Is Financial Speculation with Agricultural Commodities Harmful or Helpful? – A Literature Review of Current Empirical Research , 2015 .

[36]  I. Scoones.  Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis , 1998 .

[37]  Christoph Bader,et al.  Large-Scale Land Acquisition and Its Effects on the Water Balance in Investor and Host Countries , 2016, PloS one.

[38]  Is Financial Speculation with Agricultural Commodities Harmful or Helpful? , 2015, The Journal of Alternative Investments.

[39]  Ruth Hall,et al.  Road Mapping: Megaprojects and Land Grabs in the Northern Guatemalan Lowlands , 2013 .

[40]  B. Campion,et al.  The Effects of Biofuel Feedstock Production on Farmers’ Livelihoods in Ghana: The Case of Jatropha curcas , 2014 .

[41]  Patrick Meyfroidt,et al.  Approaches and terminology for causal analysis in land systems science , 2016 .

[42]  George Sugihara,et al.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009 .

[43]  Perrine Burnod,et al.  Competition over Authority and Access: International Land Deals in Madagascar , 2013 .

[44]  Karen C. Seto,et al.  Meta-studies in land use science: Current coverage and prospects , 2015, Ambio.

[45]  S. Borras,et al.  Land and food sovereignty , 2015 .

[46]  Daniel Müller,et al.  Drivers, constraints and trade-offs associated with recultivating abandoned cropland in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan , 2016 .

[47]  W. Anseeuw,et al.  Creating a public tool to assess and promote transparency in global land deals: the experience of the Land Matrix , 2013 .

[48]  B. Ness,et al.  Factors of vulnerability: How large-scale land acquisitions take advantage of local and national weaknesses in Sierra Leone , 2016 .

[49]  A. Zoomers.  Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: seven processes driving the current global land grab , 2010 .

[50]  P. D’Odorico,et al.  The global land rush and climate change , 2015 .

[51]  G. Oliveira.  The geopolitics of Brazilian soybeans , 2016 .

[52]  Jürgen P. Kropp,et al.  Syndromes of global change , 1997 .

[53]  Thomas Banchoff,et al.  The Politics of the , 2002 .

[54]  E. Ostrom.  A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  M. Chasukwa,et al.  The Political Economy of Land Grabs in Malawi: Investigating the Contribution of Limphasa Sugar Corporation to Rural Development , 2013 .

[56]  S. Duvail,et al.  Land and water grabbing in an east african coastal wetland : the case of the Tana delta , 2012 .

[57]  U. Müller-Böker,et al.  "Investors are good, if they follow the rules" – power relations and local perceptions in the case of two European forestry companies in Tanzania , 2014 .

[58]  J. van der Ploeg,et al.  Land concentration and land grabbing in Europe: a preliminary analysis , 2015 .

[59]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on A Framework for Analyzing, Comparing, and Diagnosing Social-Ecological Systems Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges , 2014 .

[60]  S. Rist,et al.  Constitutionality: Conditions for Crafting Local Ownership of Institution-Building Processes , 2016 .

[61]  E. Corbera,et al.  Large-scale land deals from the inside out: findings from Kenya's Tana Delta , 2012 .

[62]  Carlos Oya.  The Land Rush and Classic Agrarian Questions of Capital and Labour: a systematic scoping review of the socioeconomic impact of land grabs in Africa , 2013 .

[63]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Mapping global land system archetypes , 2013 .

[64]  Poul Wisborg.  Justice and sustainability: resistance and innovation in a transnational land deal in Ghana , 2013 .

[65]  Nazia Habib-Mintz,et al.  Biofuel investment in Tanzania: Omissions in implementation , 2010 .

[66]  H. Schellnhuber,et al.  Syndromes of Global Change: The First Panoramic View , 2004 .

[67]  Jacobo Grajales.  State Involvement, Land Grabbing and Counter-Insurgency in Colombia , 2013 .

[68]  Beatrice Crona,et al.  Using social-ecological syndromes to understand impacts of international seafood trade on small-scale fisheries , 2015 .

[69]  B. Kiteme,et al.  A human actor model as a conceptual orientation in interdisciplinary research for sustainable development , 2011 .

[70]  L. Galeano.  Paraguay and the expansion of Brazilian and Argentinian agribusiness frontiers , 2012 .

[71]  V. Dakos,et al.  Are we entering an era of concatenated global crises , 2011 .

[72]  Godofredo Vidal de la Rosa.  Explaining Social Behaviour: More on Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences , 2008 .

[73]  Jann Lay,et al.  Transnational land deals for agriculture in the global south : analytical report based on the Land Matrix database , 2012 .

[74]  A. Misselhorn,et al.  What drives food insecurity in southern Africa? a meta-analysis of household economy studies , 2005 .

[75]  L. German,et al.  Contemporary processes of large-scale land acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa: legal deficiency or elite capture of the rule of law? , 2013 .

[76]  J. Yaro.  Theorizing food insecurity: building a livelihood vulnerability framework for researching food insecurity , 2004 .

[77]  Jefferson Fox,et al.  Current trends of rubber plantation expansion may threaten biodiversity and livelihoods , 2015 .

[78]  R. DeFries,et al.  Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World , 2013, Ecology and Society.

[79]  J. Yaro,et al.  When a Good Business Model is Not Enough: Land Transactions and Gendered Livelihood Prospects in Rural Ghana , 2014 .

[80]  A. Neef,et al.  The Politics and Ethics of Land Concessions in Rural Cambodia , 2013 .

[81]  M. Edelman.  Messy hectares: questions about the epistemology of land grabbing data , 2013 .

[82]  E. Daley,et al.  Women and Land Deals in Africa and Asia: Weighing the Implications and Changing the Game , 2014 .

[83]  Thomas Rudel,et al.  Meta-analyses of case studies: A method for studying regional and global environmental change , 2008 .

[84]  T. Lavers.  Patterns of agrarian transformation in Ethiopia: State-mediated commercialisation and the ‘land grab’ , 2012 .

[85]  Alberto Alonso-Fradejas,et al.  Land control-grabbing in Guatemala: the political economy of contemporary agrarian change , 2012 .

[86]  Gearoid Millar.  Knowledge and Control in the Contemporary Land Rush: Making Local Land Legible and Corporate Power Applicable in Rural Sierra Leone , 2016 .

[87]  P. D’Odorico,et al.  Food appropriation through large scale land acquisitions , 2014 .

[88]  Diana Sietz,et al.  Land-based adaptation to global change: what drives soil and water conservation in Western Africa? , 2015 .

[89]  T. Moreda.  Listening to their silence? The political reaction of affected communities to large-scale land acquisitions: insights from Ethiopia , 2015 .

[90]  M. Petrick,et al.  Rediscovering the Virgin Lands: Agricultural Investment and Rural Livelihoods in a Eurasian Frontier Area , 2013 .

[91]  F. Boamah.  How and why chiefs formalise land use in recent times: the politics of land dispossession through biofuels investments in Ghana , 2014 .

[92]  Nam C. Nguyen,et al.  Using System Archetypes to Identify Drivers and Barriers for Sustainable Agriculture in Africa: A Case Study in Ghana , 2016 .

[93]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  The nature and causes of the global water crisis: Syndromes from a meta‐analysis of coupled human‐water studies , 2012 .

[94]  David Manuel-Navarrete,et al.  Syndromes of sustainability of development for assessing the vulnerability of coupled human–environmental systems. The case of hydrometeorological disasters in Central America and the Caribbean , 2007 .

[95]  M. Purdon.  Land Acquisitions in Tanzania: Strong Sustainability, Weak Sustainability and the Importance of Comparative Methods , 2013 .

[96]  G. Schoneveld.  The geographic and sectoral patterns of large-scale farmland investments in sub-Saharan Africa , 2014 .

[97]  S. Rist,et al.  Conflicts of customary land tenure in rural Africa: is large-scale land acquisition a driver of ‘institutional innovation’? , 2016 .

[98]  Alevgul H. Sorman,et al.  Energy transitions and the global land rush: Ultimate drivers and persistent consequences , 2012 .

[99]  Simon Swaffield,et al.  Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land-use change , 2014 .

[100]  Alex Gekker,et al.  Between two hypes: Will “big data” help unravel blind spots in understanding the “global land rush?” , 2016 .

[101]  Lorenzo Cotula,et al.  The international political economy of the global land rush: A critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers , 2012 .

[102]  G. Veldwisch,et al.  Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique , 2013 .

[103]  C. O. Delang,et al.  Coffee, mines and dams: conflicts over land in the Bolaven Plateau, southern Lao PDR , 2013 .

[104]  Maria Cristina Rulli,et al.  Global land and water grabbing , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[105]  Peter Messerli,et al.  The geography of large-scale land acquisitions: Analysing socio-ecological patterns of target contexts in the global South , 2014 .

[106]  K. Neville,et al.  Biofuels and the Politics of Mapmaking , 2012 .

[107]  L. German,et al.  Translating Legal Rights into Tenure Security: Lessons from the New Commercial Pressures on Land in Ghana , 2014 .

[108]  F. Molle,et al.  Ostrich-like strategies in Sahelian sands?: land and water grabbing in the Office du Niger, Mali. , 2012 .

[109]  P. Messerli,et al.  Marginal Lands or Marginal People? Analysing Key Processes Determining the Outcomes of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions in Lao PDR and Cambodia , 2015 .

[110]  R. Chambers,et al.  Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century , 1992 .

[111]  P. Kabat,et al.  Rethinking barriers to adaptation: Mechanism-based explanation of impasses in the governance of an innovative adaptation measure , 2014 .

[112]  K. Nolte.  Large-scale agricultural investments under poor land governance in Zambia , 2014 .

[113]  M. Dwyer.  Micro-Geopolitics: Capitalising Security in Laos’s Golden Quadrangle , 2014 .

[114]  M. Dwyer.  The formalization fix? Land titling, land concessions and the politics of spatial transparency in Cambodia , 2015 .

[115]  R. Mayntz.  Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena , 2004 .

[116]  M. Walsh-Dilley,et al.  A view from the top: examining elites in large-scale land deals , 2015 .

[117]  I. Scoones,et al.  The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals , 2012 .

[118]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[119]  A. Ziegler,et al.  Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers: A global assessment , 2012 .

[120]  B. Campion,et al.  The Chieftaincy Institution in Ghana: Causers and Arbitrators of Conflicts in Industrial Jatropha Investments , 2014 .

[121]  F. Boamah,et al.  Rethinking livelihood impacts of biofuel land deals in Ghana , 2016 .

[122]  Ken Howard,et al.  The view from the top , 2003, Nature.

[123]  Mansee Bal,et al.  Social-Ecological System Framework , 2015 .

[124]  D. Byerlee,et al.  Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? , 2011 .