Seeing with Sound? Exploring Different Characteristics of a Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution Device

Sensory substitution devices convert live visual images into auditory signals, for example with a web camera (to record the images), a computer (to perform the conversion) and headphones (to listen to the sounds). In a series of three experiments, the performance of one such device (‘The vOICe’) was assessed under various conditions on blindfolded sighted participants. The main task that we used involved identifying and locating objects placed on a table by holding a webcam (like a flashlight) or wearing it on the head (like a miner's light). Identifying objects on a table was easier with a hand-held device, but locating the objects was easier with a head-mounted device. Brightness converted into loudness was less effective than the reverse contrast (dark being loud), suggesting that performance under these conditions (natural indoor lighting, novice users) is related more to the properties of the auditory signal (ie the amount of noise in it) than the cross-modal association between loudness and brightness. Individual differences in musical memory (detecting pitch changes in two sequences of notes) was related to the time taken to identify or recognise objects, but individual differences in self-reported vividness of visual imagery did not reliably predict performance across the experiments. In general, the results suggest that the auditory characteristics of the device may be more important for initial learning than visual associations.

[1]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Sensory substitution and the human–machine interface , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  BENJAMIN WHITE,et al.  Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection , 1969, Nature.

[3]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  Tom Troscianko,et al.  Mobility performance of low‐vision adults using an electronic mobility aid , 2006, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[5]  A. Volder,et al.  Pattern recognition using a device substituting audition for vision in blindfolded sighted subjects , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Lawrence E Marks,et al.  Brighter noise: Sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  K. C. Persaud,et al.  Blind subjects construct conscious mental images of visual scenes encoded in musical form , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Lawrence E Marks,et al.  Cross-modal enhancement of perceived brightness: Sensory interaction versus response bias , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  Ellen Winner,et al.  "Metaphorical" Mapping in Human Infants , 1981 .

[11]  William M. Stern,et al.  Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  S. McKelvie The VVIQ and beyond: Vividness and its measurement. , 1995 .

[13]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[14]  P. Bach-y-Rita Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution , 1972 .

[15]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Brain plasticity: ‘visual’ acuity of blind persons via the tongue , 2001, Brain Research.

[16]  L. Marks Bright sneezes and dark coughs, loud sunlight and soft moonlight. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[18]  P. Stoerig,et al.  Seeing ‘Where’ through the Ears: Effects of Learning-by-Doing and Long-Term Sensory Deprivation on Localization Based on Image-to-Sound Substitution , 2008, PloS one.

[19]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[20]  Malika Auvray,et al.  The Vibe: a versatile vision-to-audition sensory substitution device , 2010 .

[21]  Jung-Kyong Kim,et al.  Generalized Learning of Visual-to-auditory Substitution in Sighted Individuals , 2008 .

[22]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Learning to Perceive with a Visuo — Auditory Substitution System: Localisation and Object Recognition with ‘The Voice’ , 2007, Perception.

[23]  E. McKone,et al.  Solving the upside-down puzzle: Why do upright and inverted face aftereffects look alike? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[24]  Sandra M. Sanabria-Bohórquez,et al.  Occipital Activation by Pattern Recognition in the Early Blind Using Auditory Substitution for Vision , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  J. Cronly-Dillon,et al.  The perception of visual images encoded in musical form: a study in cross-modality information transfer , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  L E Marks,et al.  On associations of light and sound: the mediation of brightness, pitch, and loudness. , 1974, The American journal of psychology.

[28]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  Functional recruitment of visual cortex for sound encoded object identification in the blind , 2009, Neuroreport.