Validation of an innovative method of shoulder range-of-motion measurement using a smartphone clinometer application.

BACKGROUND An accurate and reliable measurement of shoulder range of motion (ROM) is important in the evaluation of the shoulder. A smartphone digital clinometer application is a potentially simpler method for measuring shoulder ROM. The goal of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of shoulder ROM measurements among varying health care providers using a smartphone clinometer application in healthy and symptomatic adults. METHODS An attending surgeon, fellow, resident, physician assistant, and student served as examiners. Bilateral shoulders of 24 healthy subjects were included. Fifteen postoperative patients served as the symptomatic cohort. Examiners measured ROM of each shoulder, first using visual estimation and then using a goniometer and smartphone clinometer in a randomized fashion. RESULTS The interobserver reliability among examiners showed significant correlation, with average intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)] values of 0.61 (estimation), 0.69 (goniometer), and 0.80 (smartphone). All 5 examiners had substantial agreement with the gold standard in healthy subjects, with average ICC(2,1) values ranging from 0.62 to 0.79. The interobserver reliability in symptomatic patients showed significant correlation, with average ICC(2,1) values of 0.72 (estimation), 0.79 (goniometer), and 0.89 (smartphone). Examiners had excellent agreement with the gold standard in symptomatic patients, with an average ICC(2,1) value of 0.98. CONCLUSION The smartphone clinometer has excellent agreement with a goniometer-based gold standard for measurement of shoulder ROM in both healthy and symptomatic subjects. There is good correlation among different skill levels of providers for measurements obtained using the smartphone. A smartphone-based clinometer is a good resource for shoulder ROM measurement in both healthy subjects and symptomatic patients.

[1]  R. Buchbinder,et al.  How reliably do rheumatologists measure shoulder movement? , 2002, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  G Atkinson,et al.  Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine , 1998, Sports medicine.

[3]  Lex M Bouter,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of the visual estimation of range of motion of the shoulder. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Lauren Beaupre,et al.  Evaluating change in clinical status: reliability and measures of agreement for the assessment of glenohumeral range of motion. , 2010, North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT.

[5]  G. Murrell,et al.  Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. , 2001, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[6]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  A new shoulder range of motion screening measurement: its reliability and application in the assessment of the prevalence of shoulder contractures in patients with impaired consciousness caused by severe brain damage. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science , 2000, Sports medicine.

[8]  Ellen Shanley,et al.  Shoulder Range of Motion Measures as Risk Factors for Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in High School Softball and Baseball Players , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Jason B Lunden,et al.  Reliability of shoulder internal rotation passive range of motion measurements in the supine versus sidelying position. , 2010, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[10]  Joo Han Oh,et al.  Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone. , 2012, Manual therapy.

[11]  Jay Smith,et al.  Measuring shoulder internal rotation range of motion: a comparison of 3 techniques. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Sameer Nagda,et al.  Defining functional shoulder range of motion for activities of daily living. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[13]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Correlation of shoulder range of motion limitations at discharge with limitations in activities and participation one year later in persons with spinal cord injury. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  M. Kolber,et al.  The reliability and minimal detectable change of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer , 2011, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[15]  Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann,et al.  Objective Assessment of shoulder mobility with a new 3D gyroscope - a validation study , 2011, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[16]  P. McNair,et al.  Reliability of a new hand-held dynamometer in measuring shoulder range of motion and strength. , 2011, Manual therapy.

[17]  D. Lubarsky,et al.  Goniometric assessment of shoulder range of motion: comparison of testing in supine and sitting positions. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  P. Jones,et al.  The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[19]  M. Mullaney,et al.  Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level , 2010, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[20]  C. Terwee,et al.  Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer , 2004, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.