Robust-Control-Based Design and Comparison of an Adaptive Controller for the VEGA Launcher

This article presents the design and evaluation of an adaptive controller for the atmospheric phase VEGA launcher. This design uses an Adaptive Augmenting Control (AAC) architecture to further extend the performance and capabilities of a robust-control structured H∞ controller, which was designed based on the current VEGA control architecture. The main goal of this paper is first, to explore adaptive features for the VEGA control system and second, to evaluate its performance and robustness properties. To that end, the adaptive controller is compared with the structured H∞ baseline controller and a linear parameter varying (LPV) design (both without adaptive augmentation). The three controllers are analysed for several extreme off-nominal condition tests using a high-fidelity, nonlinear simulator of the VEGA launcher. And the main performance indicators for the atmospheric phase are evaluated through a Monte-Carlo campaign. The results show that the adaptive and LPV controllers successfully provide stability under extreme adverse flight conditions over the non-adaptive robust controller. It is also shown that the LPV approach provides a more formal and methodological way to achieve these improvements.

[1]  Tannen S. VanZwieten,et al.  Robust, Practical Adaptive Control for Launch Vehicles , 2012 .

[2]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Structured H∞ Synthesis in MATLAB , 2011 .

[3]  Andres Marcos,et al.  An overview of the RFCS project V&V framework: optimization-based and linear tools for worst-case search , 2015 .

[4]  John H. Wall,et al.  Space Launch System Implementation of Adaptive Augmenting Control , 2014 .

[5]  Andres Marcos,et al.  Linear Parameter Varying Control Synthesis for the atmospheric phase VEGA launcher , 2018 .

[6]  Curtis E. Hanson,et al.  Adaptive Augmenting Control Flight Characterization Experiment on an F/A-18 , 2014 .

[7]  Andres Marcos,et al.  Joint robust structured design of VEGA launcher’s rigid-body controller and bending filter , 2018 .

[8]  Keith Clements,et al.  Time Domain Stability Margin Assessment of the NASA Space Launch System GN&C Design for Exploration Mission One , 2017 .

[9]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Mixed H2/H∞ control via nonsmooth optimization , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[10]  Pedro Simplicio,et al.  Structured Singular-Value Analysis of the Vega Launcher in Atmospheric Flight , 2016 .

[11]  J. Jim Zhu,et al.  Stability Metrics for Simulation and Flight-Software Assessment and Monitoring of Adaptive Control Assist Compensators , 2008 .

[12]  Andrés Marcos,et al.  STRUCTURED H-INFINITY CONTROL DESIGN FOR THE VEGA LAUNCH VEHICLE: RECOVERY OF THE LEGACY CONTROL BEHAVIOUR , 2017 .

[13]  Peter J Seiler,et al.  LPVTools: A Toolbox for Modeling, Analysis, and Synthesis of Parameter Varying Control Systems ? , 2015 .

[14]  Tannen S. VanZwieten,et al.  Evaluating the stability of NASA’s space launch system with adaptive augmenting control , 2018, CEAS Space Journal.