BACKGROUND
According to the body-specificity hypothesis, people with different bodily characteristics should form correspondingly different mental representations, even in highly abstract conceptual domains. In a previous test of this proposal, right- and left-handers were found to associate positive ideas like intelligence, attractiveness, and honesty with their dominant side and negative ideas with their non-dominant side. The goal of the present study was to determine whether 'body-specific' associations of space and valence can be observed beyond the laboratory in spontaneous behavior, and whether these implicit associations have visible consequences.
METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
We analyzed speech and gesture (3012 spoken clauses, 1747 gestures) from the final debates of the 2004 and 2008 US presidential elections, which involved two right-handers (Kerry, Bush) and two left-handers (Obama, McCain). Blind, independent coding of speech and gesture allowed objective hypothesis testing. Right- and left-handed candidates showed contrasting associations between gesture and speech. In both of the left-handed candidates, left-hand gestures were associated more strongly with positive-valence clauses and right-hand gestures with negative-valence clauses; the opposite pattern was found in both right-handed candidates.
CONCLUSIONS
Speakers associate positive messages more strongly with dominant hand gestures and negative messages with non-dominant hand gestures, revealing a hidden link between action and emotion. This pattern cannot be explained by conventions in language or culture, which associate 'good' with 'right' but not with 'left'; rather, results support and extend the body-specificity hypothesis. Furthermore, results suggest that the hand speakers use to gesture may have unexpected (and probably unintended) communicative value, providing the listener with a subtle index of how the speaker feels about the content of the co-occurring speech.
[1]
Sian L. Beilock,et al.
Embodied Preference Judgments
,
2007,
Psychological science.
[2]
Richard J Davidson,et al.
Emotion as Motion
,
2007,
Psychological science.
[3]
M. Studdert-Kennedy.
Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought.
,
1994
.
[4]
Gilbert Austin,et al.
Chironomia, Or, a Treatise on Rhetorical Delivery
,
1966
.
[5]
Asli Ozyurek.
Do Speakers Design Their Cospeech Gestures for Their Addressees? The Effects of Addressee Location on Representational Gestures
,
2002
.
[6]
D. Casasanto,et al.
of Experimental Psychology
,
2022
.
[7]
N. Schwarz,et al.
Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments
,
1998
.
[8]
Roel M. Willems,et al.
Body-Specific Motor Imagery of Hand Actions: Neural Evidence from Right- and Left-Handers
,
2009,
Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[9]
Sotaro Kita,et al.
Pointing left in Ghana: How a taboo on the use of the left hand influences gestural practice
,
2001
.
[10]
Daniel M. Oppenheimer.
The secret life of fluency
,
2008,
Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[11]
Roel M. Willems,et al.
Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers
,
2009,
NeuroImage.
[12]
S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.
Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think
,
2003
.
[13]
M. Corballis,et al.
The Psychology of Left and Right
,
2020
.
[14]
N. Fox,et al.
Behavioral reactivity and approach-withdrawal bias in infancy.
,
2008,
Developmental psychology.