p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high‐grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi‐institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11–2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.

Yurii B. Shvetsov | A. Whittemore | A. Talhouk | A. Hein | E. Goode | N. Traficante | S. Fereday | A. deFazio | D. Bowtell | B. Karlan | J. Benítez | N. Le | A. Berchuck | D. Huntsman | P. Pharoah | M. Köbel | M. Jimenez-Linan | J. Brenton | C. Gilks | M. Anglesio | A. Brooks-Wilson | L. Wilkens | A. Gentry-Maharaj | M. Widschwendter | M. Shah | S. Orsulic | M. Goodman | A. Swerdlow | A. Jakubowska | J. Lubiński | M. Schoemaker | S. Gayther | Chen Wang | A. Osorio | L. Paz-Ares | T. Longacre | L. Kelemen | I. Campbell | T. Ramón Y Cajal | J. Schildkraut | F. Modugno | M. Ruebner | M. El-Bahrawy | P. Ghatage | A. Hartkopf | R. Fortner | M. Carney | R. Erber | J. Lester | C. Cybulski | H. Harris | J. Rothstein | W. Sieh | Raghwa N. Sharma | S. Winham | B. Hernandez | L. Cook | J. Gronwald | Stewart G. Martin | E. Elishaev | Cheng-Han Lee | S. Ramus | H. Steed | P. Fasching | P. Coulson | Y. Shvetsov | K. Sundfeldt | Marjorie J. Riggan | P. Harnett | J. Hendley | Britta Ney | A. Staebler | S. Kommoss | A. Olawaiye | S. Storr | Helena Gronwald | S. Deen | F. J. Candido dos Reis | N. S. Meagher | J. Alsop | A. Brand | J. Koziak | Yajue Huang | M. Lycke | P. Rambau | T. Kluz | J. Boros | G. Nelson | A. Fischer | E. Kang | M. Grube | M. Courtney-Brooks | M. Boisen | Usha Menon | Christiani Bisinotto | C. Mateoiu | Arantzazu Barquín-García | Ashley Weir | A. Hartmann | V. Mcguire | K. Cushing-Haugen | Jaime Lesnock | Gregg Nelson | Jennifer A. Doherty | Bryan M McCauley | N. Singh | Catherine J Kennedy | M. Beckmann | María J. García | Mark E. Sherman | María J García | Michael E. Jones | Michael E. Jones | M. Riggan | J. Doherty | Catherine J. Kennedy

[1]  Sebastian M. Armasu,et al.  Molecular Subclasses of Clear Cell Ovarian Carcinoma and Their Impact on Disease Behavior and Outcomes , 2022, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[2]  P. Vahteristo,et al.  TCGA molecular classification in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas: Novel data on clear cell carcinoma. , 2022, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  Yurii B. Shvetsov,et al.  Validated biomarker assays confirm that ARID1A loss is confounded with MMR deficiency, CD8+ TIL infiltration, and provides no independent prognostic value in endometriosis‐associated ovarian carcinomas , 2021, The Journal of pathology.

[4]  Sebastian M. Armasu,et al.  DNA Methylation Profiles of Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma , 2021, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[5]  M. Köbel,et al.  Selection of endometrial carcinomas for p53 immunohistochemistry based on nuclear features , 2021, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.

[6]  N. Le,et al.  Accurate Distinction of Ovarian Clear Cell From Endometrioid Carcinoma Requires Integration of Phenotype, Immunohistochemical Predictions, and Genotype , 2021, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[7]  R. L. Hollis,et al.  Integrated molecular characterisation of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma identifies opportunities for stratification , 2021, npj Precision Oncology.

[8]  K. Garg,et al.  Cytoplasmic Pattern p53 Immunoexpression in Pelvic and Endometrial Carcinomas With TP53 Mutation Involving Nuclear Localization Domains , 2021, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[9]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Mesonephric and mesonephric-like carcinomas of the female genital tract: molecular characterization including cases with mixed histology and matched metastases , 2021, Modern Pathology.

[10]  M. Köbel,et al.  The Many Uses of p53 Immunohistochemistry in Gynecological Pathology: Proceedings of the ISGyP Companion Society Session at the 2020 USCAP Annual9 Meeting , 2020, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[11]  M. Köbel,et al.  SWI/SNF‐deficiency defines highly aggressive undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma , 2020, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.

[12]  H. Putter,et al.  Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  A. Talhouk,et al.  Endometrial Cancer Molecular Risk Stratification is Equally Prognostic for Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma , 2020, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  N. Kushlinskii,et al.  Spectrum of TP53 Mutations in BRCA1/2 Associated High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[15]  P. Fasching,et al.  Prognostic gene expression signature for high-grade serous ovarian cancer , 2020, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  N. Le,et al.  Combined CCNE1 high‐level amplification and overexpression is associated with unfavourable outcome in tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma , 2020, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.

[17]  J. López-Guerrero,et al.  Molecular Heterogeneity of Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma , 2020, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[18]  R. L. Hollis,et al.  Molecular stratification of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma predicts clinical outcome , 2020, Nature Communications.

[19]  C. Gilks,et al.  Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas , 2019, The Journal of pathology.

[20]  M. Köbel,et al.  p53 immunohistochemistry is an accurate surrogate for TP53 mutational analysis in endometrial carcinoma biopsies , 2019, The Journal of pathology.

[21]  S. Nofech-Mozes,et al.  p53, Mismatch Repair Protein, and POLE Abnormalities in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma , 2019, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[22]  G. Mills,et al.  Clinical relevance of TP53 hotspot mutations in high-grade serous ovarian cancers , 2019, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  R. L. Hollis,et al.  Hormone receptor expression patterns define clinically meaningful subgroups of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[24]  N. Le,et al.  Ovarian Carcinoma Histotype: Strengths and Limitations of Integrating Morphology With Immunohistochemical Predictions , 2019, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[25]  Dale W. Garsed,et al.  Survival Following Chemotherapy in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Is Not Associated with Pathological Misclassification of Tumor Histotype , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  A. Talhouk,et al.  Nuclear β‐catenin and CDX2 expression in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma identify patients with favourable outcome , 2019, Histopathology.

[27]  S. Nofech-Mozes,et al.  FIGO Versus Silverberg Grading Systems in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma: A Comparative Prognostic Analysis , 2019, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[28]  Igor Jurisica,et al.  TP53 mutations in high grade serous ovarian cancer and impact on clinical outcomes: a comparison of next generation sequencing and bioinformatics analyses , 2019, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[29]  Sebastian M. Armasu,et al.  Association of p16 expression with prognosis varies across ovarian carcinoma histotypes: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study , 2018, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.

[30]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Dose-Response Association of CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Survival Time in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[31]  Oliver Hofmann,et al.  Copy-number signatures and mutational processes in ovarian carcinoma , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[32]  S. Nofech-Mozes,et al.  Molecular-based classification algorithm for endometrial carcinoma categorizes ovarian endometrioid carcinoma into prognostically significant groups , 2017, Modern Pathology.

[33]  M. Köbel,et al.  Association of Hormone Receptor Expression with Survival in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma: Biological Validation and Clinical Implications , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[34]  N. Rosenfeld,et al.  Optimized p53 immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of TP53 mutation in ovarian carcinoma , 2016, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.

[35]  S. Leung,et al.  An Immunohistochemical Algorithm for Ovarian Carcinoma Typing , 2016, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[36]  I. Shih,et al.  Molecular Alterations of TP53 are a Defining Feature of Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Rereview of Cases Lacking TP53 Mutations in The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Study , 2016, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[37]  K. Thiel,et al.  TP53 oncomorphic mutations predict resistance to platinum- and taxane-based standard chemotherapy in patients diagnosed with advanced serous ovarian carcinoma , 2014, International journal of oncology.

[38]  R. Kurman,et al.  WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs , 2014 .

[39]  I. Sohn,et al.  Clinical Relevance of Gain-Of-Function Mutations of p53 in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Hormone-receptor expression and ovarian cancer survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[41]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma , 2013, Nature.

[42]  Gord Glendon,et al.  Association Between BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations and Survival in Women With Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer , 2012 .

[43]  A. Reuss,et al.  The biological and clinical value of p53 expression in pelvic high‐grade serous carcinomas , 2010, The Journal of pathology.

[44]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary , 2010, The Journal of pathology.

[45]  Joshua Labaer,et al.  p53 Autoantibodies as Potential Detection and Prognostic Biomarkers in Serous Ovarian Cancer , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[46]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[47]  S. Leung,et al.  Ovarian Carcinoma Subtypes Are Different Diseases: Implications for Biomarker Studies , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[48]  Nhu Le,et al.  Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma. , 2008, Human pathology.

[49]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Critical molecular abnormalities in high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary , 2008, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.

[50]  A. Malpica Grading of ovarian cancer: a histotype-specific approach. , 2008, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[51]  S. Silverberg Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. , 1999, Gynecologic oncology.