The Paradox of Openness: How Product and Patenting Experience Affect R&D Sourcing in China?

External R&D sourcing may help firms compete in an environment characterized by rapid technological changes. Yet, prior studies have produced conflicting findings on how a firm's technological experience affects the extent to which the firm engages in external R&D sourcing. Although many highlight that firms with extensive technological experience are equipped with more technological knowledge, collaborative skills, and absorptive capacity, encouraging greater levels of external R&D, others suggest the opposite due to potential exchange hazards and partnership conflicts. Adopting an external partner's perspective, the current study reconsiders this “paradox of openness” by analyzing how a focal firm's product experience and patenting experience affect an external partner's tendency to provide external R&D services to the focal firm. Specifically, this study explore how a focal firm's knowledge protectiveness and tacitness embedded in its product and patenting experience influences the external partners' motivation for knowledge transfer. This study predicts that a firm's product experience increases the focal firm's external R&D sourcing because it provides high levels of knowledge tacitness and external openness and can encourage external partners to share and exchange knowledge with the focal firm. In contrast, a firm's patenting experience decreases the focal firm's external R&D sourcing because it denotes knowledge explicitness and protectiveness and may discourage external partners to share and exchange knowledge with the focal firm. This study further predicts that patenting experience has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between product experience and external R&D sourcing. Using a data set of 575 high-tech firms in China, this study finds support for our predictions. Our findings contribute to the growing literature on the knowledge-based view and technology entrepreneurship in emerging markets.

[1]  P. Jensen,et al.  Knowledge management: does capture impede creation? , 2009 .

[2]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[3]  Michael J. Leiblein,et al.  The Choice of Organizational Governance Form and Performance: Predictions from Transaction Cost, Resource-based, and Real Options Theories , 2003 .

[4]  C. Wolter,et al.  The Effects of Innovation on Vertical Structure: Perspectives on Transaction Costs and Competences , 2008 .

[5]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  How Do Young Firms Manage Product Portfolio Complexity? The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity , 2012 .

[6]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[7]  G. Jefferson,et al.  A great wall of patents: What is behind China's recent patent explosion? , 2009 .

[8]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[9]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[10]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving Perspective , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[11]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[12]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Selective Intervention and Internal Hybrids : Interpreting and Learning from the Rise and Decline of the Oticon Spaghetti Organization , 2001 .

[13]  A. Arora,et al.  The Paradox of Openness Revisited: Collaborative Innovation and Patenting by UK Innovators , 2015 .

[14]  W. Bean.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1961 .

[15]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Capabilities, Transaction Costs, and Firm Boundaries , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Marco S. Giarratana,et al.  The relationship between knowledge sourcing and fear of imitation , 2014 .

[17]  Jeffrey T. Macher,et al.  Experience and scale and scope economies: Trade-offs and performance in development. , 2006 .

[18]  R. Veugelers.  Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .

[19]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[20]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Learning, knowledge acquisition, and strategic alliances , 1998 .

[21]  H. Demsetz.  The Theory of the Firm Revisited , 1988 .

[22]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Knowledge Creation in New Product Development Projects , 2006 .

[23]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[24]  Vikas A. Aggarwal,et al.  Modes of Cooperative R&D Commercialization by Start-ups , 2009 .

[25]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Explaining post-IPO venture performance through a knowledge-based view typology , 2014 .

[26]  Jonathan Nook,et al.  ["A Model for New Product Development: An Empirical Test"] , 2007 .

[27]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[28]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[29]  Lars Huemer,et al.  Trustworthiness, Risk, and the Transfer of Tacit and Explicit Knowledge between Alliance Partners , 2008 .

[30]  Gianluca Carnabuci,et al.  Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination , 2013 .

[31]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[32]  Brent B. Allred,et al.  Process Technology Sourcing and the Innovation Context , 2014 .

[33]  Teppo Felin,et al.  Theories of the Firm-Market Boundary , 2011 .

[34]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[35]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[36]  Eric Fang.  The Effect of Strategic Alliance Knowledge Complementarity on New Product Innovativeness in China , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations , 2011 .

[38]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Capabilities, Contractual Hazards, and Governance: Integrating Resource-Based and Transaction Cost Perspectives , 2006 .

[39]  O. Williamson,et al.  STRATEGY RESEARCH: GOVERNANCE AND COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[40]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Firm‐specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the roles of economic‐ and relationship‐based employee governance mechanisms , 2009 .

[41]  Chung-Jen Chen.  The Effects of Knowledge Attribute, Alliance Characteristics, and Absorptive Capacity on Knowledge Transfer Performance , 2004 .

[42]  David H. Hsu,et al.  Resources as dual sources of advantage: Implications for valuing entrepreneurial‐firm patents , 2013 .

[43]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study , 2008 .

[44]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[45]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[46]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Returnees Versus Locals: Who Perform Better in China's Technology Entrepreneurship? , 2012, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

[47]  R. Brandis.  The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[48]  Tang Wang,et al.  When does selling make you wiser? Impact of licensing on Chinese firms’ patenting propensity , 2015 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[50]  Sandra L. Robinson,et al.  Psychological Ownership, Territorial Behavior, and Being Perceived as a Team Contributor: The Critical Role of Trust in the Work Environment , 2014 .

[51]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing , 1997 .

[52]  M. Hitt,et al.  Toward a Model of Strategic Outsourcing , 2007 .

[53]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[54]  Jeffrey T. Macher.  Technological Development and the Boundaries of the Firm: A Knowledge-Based Examination in Semiconductor Manufacturing , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[55]  Peter Teirlinck,et al.  Internal capabilities, network resources and appropriation mechanisms as determinants of R&D outsourcing , 2015 .

[56]  B. Silverman,et al.  R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE , 2004 .

[57]  Ron Adner,et al.  What Firms Make vs. What They Know: How Firms' Production and Knowledge Boundaries Affect Competitive Advantage in the Face of Technological Change , 2009 .

[58]  J. Myles Shaver,et al.  Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital , 2009 .

[59]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[60]  Thomas J. Cottrell,et al.  Product Variety and Firm Survival in the Microcomputer Software Industry , 2004 .

[61]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  An Examination of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer: China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park , 2006 .

[62]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[63]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  External technology sourcing: The effect of uncertainty on governance mode choice , 2007 .

[64]  Christian Peukert,et al.  R&D outsourcing and intellectual property infringement , 2015 .

[65]  Stefan Wagner,et al.  Patent Examination at the State Intellectual Property Office in China , 2013 .

[66]  Lamar Pierce,et al.  The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth , 2009 .

[67]  D. Teece.  Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation" , 2006 .

[68]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[69]  D. Scott DeRue,et al.  Interpersonal Perceptions and the Emergence of Leadership Structures in Groups: A Network Perspective , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[70]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Technology In-Sourcing and the Creation of Pioneering Technologies , 2008 .

[71]  Hart E. Posen,et al.  An Advantage of Newness: Vicarious Learning Despite Limited Absorptive Capacity , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[72]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[73]  R. Veugelers,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY MAKE AND BUY IN INNOVATION STRATEGIES : EVIDENCE FROM BELGIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1998 .

[74]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[75]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[76]  J. P. Eggers,et al.  All experience is not created equal: learning, adapting, and focusing in product portfolio management , 2012 .

[77]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Learning Through Joint Ventures: A Framework Of Knowledge Acquisition , 2000 .

[78]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[79]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Connect, then lead. , 2013, Harvard business review.