Incidence and outcome of myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention during COVID-19 pandemic

Objective Most reports on the declining incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) during the COVID-19 have either been anecdotal, survey results or geographically limited to areas with lockdowns. We examined the incidence of MI during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden, which has remained an open society with a different public health approach fighting COVID-19. Methods We assessed the incidence rate (IR) as well as the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of all MI referred for coronary angiography in Sweden using the nationwide Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR), during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden (1 March 2020–7 May 2020) in relation to the same days 2015–2019. Results A total of 2443 MIs were referred for coronary angiography during the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in an IR 36 MIs/day (204 MIs/100 000 per year) compared with 15 213 MIs during the reference period with an IR of 45 MIs/day (254 MIs/100 000 per year) resulting in IRR of 0.80, 95% CI (0.74 to 0.86), p<0.001. Results were consistent in all investigated patient subgroups, indicating no change in patient category seeking cardiac care. Kaplan-Meier event rates for 7-day case fatality were 439 (2.3%) compared with 37 (2.9%) (HR: 0.81, 95% CI (0.58 to 1.13), p=0.21). Time to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was shorter during the pandemic and PCI was equally performed, indicating no change in quality of care during the pandemic. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly reduced the incidence of MI referred for invasive treatment strategy. No differences in overall short-term case fatality or quality of care indicators were observed.

[1]  M. Landray,et al.  COVID-19 pandemic and admission rates for and management of acute coronary syndromes in England , 2020, The Lancet.

[2]  R. de Caterina,et al.  Reduction of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction in Italy in the COVID-19 era , 2020, European heart journal.

[3]  Catherine Klersy,et al.  Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest during the Covid-19 Outbreak in Italy , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  F. Fedele,et al.  Reduced Rate of Hospital Admissions for ACS during Covid-19 Outbreak in Northern Italy , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  A. Bauer,et al.  Decline of acute coronary syndrome admissions in Austria since the outbreak of COVID-19: the pandemic response causes cardiac collateral damage , 2020, European heart journal.

[6]  C. Schmidt,et al.  Reduction in ST-Segment Elevation Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activations in the United States During COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  J. Hoving,et al.  Coronavirus (COVID-19): , 2020, TBV – Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde.

[8]  Mohammad Madjid,et al.  Potential Effects of Coronaviruses on the Cardiovascular System: A Review. , 2020, JAMA cardiology.

[9]  C. Siu,et al.  Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak on ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care in Hong Kong, China , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[10]  A. Ferguson Coronavirus - COVID-19 , 2020 .

[11]  Yaiza Beatriz Molero-Díez,et al.  Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2019, Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.

[12]  B. Lindahl,et al.  Christmas, national holidays, sport events, and time factors as triggers of acute myocardial infarction: SWEDEHEART observational study 1998-2013 , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[13]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). , 2018, Circulation.

[14]  J. Muller,et al.  Association of Weather With Day-to-Day Incidence of Myocardial Infarction: A SWEDEHEART Nationwide Observational Study , 2018, JAMA cardiology.

[15]  Kristian Thygesen,et al.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  L. Rosella,et al.  Acute Myocardial Infarction after Laboratory‐Confirmed Influenza Infection , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Jin Zhou,et al.  Association of influenza virus infection and inflammatory cytokines with acute myocardial infarction , 2012, Inflammation Research.

[18]  P. Delafontaine,et al.  Effect of Hurricane Katrina on incidence of acute myocardial infarction in New Orleans three years after the storm. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  H. Kan,et al.  Stock volatility as a risk factor for coronary heart disease death. , 2011, European heart journal.

[20]  L. Wallentin,et al.  Abstract 1428: Statin Use After Myocardial Iinfarction Improves Survival in Nearly All With Renal Dysfunction: Data From the Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) , 2009 .

[21]  G. Lippi,et al.  Cardiovascular events during World Cup soccer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  S. Greven,et al.  Cardiovascular events during World Cup soccer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R. Kloner,et al.  Population-based analysis of the effect of the Northridge Earthquake on cardiac death in Los Angeles County, California. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  I. Kutz,et al.  Effect of Iraqi missile war on incidence of acute myocardial infarction and sudden death in Israeli civilians , 1991, The Lancet.