Long‐term tillage and crop rotation effects on weed seedbank size and composition

Size and composition of the weed seedbank was assessed after 12 years of application of four tillage systems in two crop rotations. Mouldboard and chisel ploughing at 45 cm, minimum tillage at 15 cm and no tillage were compared in continuous winter wheat and a pigeon bean/winter wheat 2-year rotation. Weed control was based upon post-emergence herbicide application. Weed seedling emergence from soil samples taken at 0–15, 15–30 and 30–45 cm depths was assessed in a non-heated glasshouse for 12 months. The tillage system influenced weed seedbank size and composition to a much greater extent than crop rotation. Total weed seedling density was higher in no tillage, minimum tillage and chisel ploughing plots in the 0–15, 15–30 and 30–45 cm layers respectively. Density in the whole (0–45 cm) layer did not differ significantly among tillage systems. With no tillage, more than 60% of the total seedlings emerged from the surface layer, compared with an average 43% in the other tillage systems. Crop rotation did not influence either weed seedbank size or seedling distribution among soil layers, and only had a small influence on major species abundance. The weed seedbank was dominated (>66%) by Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.), which thrived in chisel ploughing and no tillage respectively. Results suggested that crop rotation and substitution of mouldboard ploughing by non-inversion tillage (especially by minimum tillage) would not result in increased weed problems, whereas use of no tillage might increase weed infestations because of higher seedling recruitment from the topsoil.

[1]  J. Zadoks.  A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 1974 .

[2]  T. Mester,et al.  The effect of maize residues and tillage on emergence of Setaria faberi, Abutilon theophrasti, Amaranthus retroflexus and Chenopodium album , 1996 .

[3]  C. L. Mohler.  A Model of the Effects of Tillage on Emergence of Weed Seedlings. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  F. Forcella,et al.  Foxtail (Setaria spp.) seedling dynamics in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) are influenced by seeding date and tillage regime , 1999, Weed Science.

[5]  G. Zanin,et al.  Ecological interpretation of weed flora dynamics under different tillage systems , 1997 .

[6]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF ERIGERON CANADENSIS, A SUCCESSIONAL WINTER ANNUAL , 1979 .

[7]  E. Bonari,et al.  Structure of weed seedbank communities under different management systems for continuous maize crop , 1998 .

[8]  Daniel A. Ball,et al.  Weed Seedbank Response to Tillage, Herbicides, and Crop Rotation Sequence , 1992, Weed Science.

[9]  Clarence J. Swanton,et al.  Impact of Agronomic Practices on Weed Communities: Tillage Systems , 1993, Weed Science.

[10]  D. Clements,et al.  Tillage Effects on Weed Seed Return and Seedbank Composition , 1996, Weed Science.

[11]  Ram C. Dalal,et al.  Sustaining Productivity of a Vertisol at Warra, Queensland, with Fertilisers, No-Tillage, or Legumes. 1. Organic Matter Status , 1995 .

[12]  G. Zanin,et al.  Estimation du stock semencier d'un sol labouré ou en semis direct , 1989 .

[13]  C. Swanton,et al.  Effect of tillage and corn on pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) seedling emergence and density , 1997, Weed Science.

[14]  Richard M. Cruse,et al.  Crop rotations for the 21st century , 1994 .

[15]  F. Forcella,et al.  Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried seed reserves , 1992 .

[16]  M. Arshad,et al.  Barley, Canola, and Weed Growth with Decreasing Tillage in a Cold, Semiarid Climate , 1995 .

[17]  T. Whitwell,et al.  Influence of Tillage on Horseweed, Conyza canadensis , 1988, Weed Technology.

[18]  D. Angers,et al.  Manure, Tillage, and Crop Rotation: Effects on Residual Weed Interference in Spring Barley Cropping Systems , 1998 .

[19]  J. Cardina,et al.  Long-Term Tillage Effects on Seed Banks in Three Ohio Soils , 1991, Weed Science.

[20]  A. Légére,et al.  Relative influence of crop rotation, tillage, and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping systems , 1999, Weed Science.

[21]  J. Recasens,et al.  Precision of soil seedbank sampling : how many soil cores ? , 1996 .

[22]  J. J. Kells,et al.  Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. , 1990 .

[23]  K. J. Wright,et al.  Predicting the growth and competitive effects of annual weeds in wheat , 1990 .

[24]  R. Froud-Williams,et al.  Influence of Cultivation Regime Upon Buried Weed Seeds in Arable Cropping Systems , 1983 .

[25]  N. Silvestri,et al.  Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation , 1997 .

[26]  M. Arshad,et al.  Weed flora in the early growth period of spring crops under conventional, reduced, and zero tillage systems on a clay soil in northern Alberta, Canada , 1995 .

[27]  R. L. Blevins,et al.  Conservation Tillage: An Ecological Approach to Soil Management , 1993 .

[28]  D. Buhler,et al.  Emergence and survival of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). , 1997 .

[29]  E. Bonari,et al.  Size and composition of the weed seedbank under different management systems for continuous maize cropping. , 1998 .

[30]  J. Dorado,et al.  Weed seedbank response to crop rotation and tillage in semiarid agroecosystems , 1999, Weed Science.

[31]  D. Buhler,et al.  Effects of Tillage on Vertical Distribution and Viability of Weed Seed in Soil , 1992, Weed Science.

[32]  R. Papendick,et al.  Weed Management for Crop Production in the Northwest Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Region , 1996, Weed Science.