Resources for coordination in collaborative telelearning

We have analyzed data from a field study in collaborative telelearning (Wasson, 1999). The goal of the study was to investigate how the students used a set of groupware tools to coordinate learning activities. We have used concepts from collaborative telelearning and coordination mechanisms (Schmidt & Simone, 1996) as analytic framework. Our findings indicate that students coordinate many activities by implicit, locally adopted resources instead of fully developed mechanisms. Three implicit resources were identified and named (no initial discussion, asymmetry of knowledge, and different expectations). These resources were not associated with any specific groupware features, but referred to the students' background knowledge and subjective interpretation. We end the paper by suggesting how implicit resources in distributed learning environments can play a role similar to how non-verbal cues -- such as gesture and facial expression -- play a role in face-to-face interaction, but without imitating human body language.

[1]  Anders I. Mørch,et al.  Identifying collaboration patterns in collaborative telelearning scenarios , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Policies and roles in collaborative applications , 1996, CSCW '96.

[3]  J. Kaasboll Intentional development of professional language through computerization. A case study and some theoretical considerations , 1987 .

[4]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Rooms: the use of multiple virtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical user interface , 1986, TOGS.

[5]  Carla Simone,et al.  Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design , 1996, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[6]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Support for workspace awareness in educational groupware , 1995, CSCL.

[7]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Telelearning Research using Server Logs , 2000 .

[8]  Thomas W. Mastaglio,et al.  The role of critiquing in cooperative problem solving , 1991, TOIS.

[9]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  TeamRooms: network places for collaboration , 1996, CSCW '96.

[10]  Nicholas Carriero,et al.  Coordination languages and their significance , 1992, CACM.

[11]  W. Bean Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1961 .

[12]  Barbara Wasson Design and evaluation of a collaborative telelearning activity aimed at teacher training , 1999, CSCL.

[13]  Terry Winograd,et al.  A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work , 1986, CSCW '86.

[14]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Beyond being there , 1992, CHI.

[15]  Irene Greif,et al.  Computer-supported cooperative work: a book of readings , 1988 .

[16]  J. Wertsch,et al.  Sociocultural studies of mind: Sociocultural studies: history, action, and mediation , 1995 .

[17]  A. Strauss Work and the Division of Labor , 1985 .

[18]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Groupware for developing critical discussion skills , 1995, CSCL.

[19]  Terry Winograd A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work , 1987, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Mauricio Cortes,et al.  DCWPL: a programming language for describing collaborative work , 1996, CSCW '96.

[21]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[22]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? , 1990, CSCW '90.