Toward a telepresence robot empowered smart lab

In the context of distance education, lab and field work are a considerable challenge for students, professors, and institutions. This paper presents a Telepresence Robot Empowered Smart Lab (TRESL) system as a new and emerging technology with a potential to overcome this challenge. The main focus of this paper is to propose a conceptual model, to define the ultimate goals of the proposed solution, and to present its system architecture and the modules to support the functions and features. A pilot project was conducted and is also presented in this paper. The pilot project includes the experimental implementation of a telepresence robot in a mock-up smart lab and the collection and analysis of survey data from users of the robot. The main findings of the pilot study are, 1) online users can easily operate the telepresence robot; and 2) operating the robot manually will increase the engagement of online users with the remote lab environment. The pilot study provides firm evidence that the proposed TRESL system is a promising and innovative approach for online students to conduct their lab work in a remote laboratory. The results also suggest avenues for further research and development of the system.

[1]  Daniel Bug Oculus Rift Control of a Mobile Robot : Providing a 3D Virtual Reality Visualization for TeleoperationorHow to Enter a Robots Mind , 2014 .

[2]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review , 2006, CSUR.

[3]  W. Durfee,et al.  Take-home lab kits for system dynamics and controls courses , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[4]  Jennifer DeBoer,et al.  International STEM Classrooms: The Experiences of Students Around the World Using Physical Remote Laboratory Kits , 2015 .

[5]  Andrew D. Maxwell,et al.  Supporting Remote Laboratory Activities at an Institutional Level , 2013, Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng..

[6]  Raghu Raman,et al.  Complementing Neurophysiology Education for Developing Countries via Cost-Effective Virtual Labs: Case Studies and Classroom Scenarios. , 2014, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[7]  Kinshuk,et al.  The 5R Adaptation Framework: Concepts, Systems, and Learning Scenarios , 2016 .

[8]  Musa Jouaneh,et al.  Control system experiments at home , 2011, 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[9]  Zeynep Tatli,et al.  Effect of a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory on Students' Achievement , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[10]  Enrica Pesare Smart learning environments for social learning , 2015, SAC.

[11]  Mohamed Ally,et al.  A Ubiquitous Computing Platform - Affordable Telepresence Robot Design and Applications , 2014, 2014 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[12]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories , 2007, TCHI.

[13]  Fiorella Haim,et al.  Lab at Home: Hardware Kits for a Digital Design Lab , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[14]  Raghu Raman,et al.  Pedagogical Support for Collaborative Development of Virtual and Remote Labs: Amrita VLCAP , 2018 .

[15]  E. Lunsford,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Learning Biology in Distance-Based Settings. , 2013 .

[16]  Ivan Marsic,et al.  ViBE: virtual biology experiments , 2001, WWW '01.

[17]  Martyn Cooper,et al.  Remote Laboratories Extending Access to Science and Engineering Curricular , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[18]  Ilung Pranata,et al.  A review of contemporary virtual and remote laboratory implementations: observations and findings , 2016 .

[19]  Michael E. Auer,et al.  Cyber-physical laboratories in engineering and science education , 2018 .