Individual and combined effects of enactment and testing on memory for action phrases.

We investigated the individual and combined effects of enactment and testing on memory for action phrases to address whether both study techniques commonly promote item-specific processing. Participants (N = 112) were divided into four groups (n = 28). They either exclusively studied 36 action phrases (e.g., "lift the glass") or both studied and cued-recalled them in four trials. During study trials participants encoded the action phrases either by motorically performing them, or by reading them aloud, and they took final verb-cued recall tests over 18-min and 1-week retention intervals. A testing effect was demonstrated for action phrases, however, only when they were verbally encoded, and not when they were enacted. Similarly, enactive (relative to verbal) encoding reduced the rate of forgetting, but only when the action phrases were exclusively studied, and not when they were also tested. These less-than-additive effects of enactment and testing on the rate of forgetting, as well as on long-term retention, support the notion that both study techniques effectively promote item-specific processing that can only be marginally increased further by combining them.

[1]  L Nyberg,et al.  The role of enactment in implicit and explicit memory , 1995, Psychological research.

[2]  R. R. Hunt,et al.  The Concept of Distinctiveness in Memory Research , 2012 .

[3]  Brian McElree,et al.  Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of their degree of learning. , 1983 .

[4]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Recall of enacted and nonenacted instructions compared: forgetting functions , 1989 .

[5]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[6]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Remembering actions and words , 2000 .

[7]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[8]  G. Cumming.  Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[9]  V. C. Rabelo,et al.  Tests enhance learningCompared to what , 2012 .

[10]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Recall of actions, sentences, and nouns: Influences of adult age and passage of time☆ , 1992 .

[11]  M. Steffens,et al.  Decomposing retrieval and integration in memory for actions: A multinomial modeling approach , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  L. Nilsson,et al.  The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[13]  A. C. Butler,et al.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Reza Kormi-Nouri,et al.  The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view , 1995 .

[15]  M. Knopf.  Having shaved a kiwi fruit: Memory of unfamiliar subject-performed actions , 1991 .

[16]  Johannes Engelkamp,et al.  Lexical, conceptual and motor information in memory for action phrases: a multi-system account. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[17]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[18]  Geoffrey R. Loftus,et al.  Evaluating forgetting curves. , 1985 .

[19]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis , 2010, Science.

[20]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .

[21]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Tests and test feedback as learning sources , 1991 .

[23]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Memory for actions: How different? , 2010 .

[24]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping , 2011, Science.

[25]  R. Bjork,et al.  Why Tests Appear to Prevent Forgetting: A Distribution-Based Bifurcation Model. , 2011 .

[26]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[28]  V. C. Rabelo,et al.  Tests enhance learning—Compared to what? , 2012 .

[29]  M. Knopf,et al.  Aging and Memory for Action Events: The Role of Familiarity. , 1989 .

[30]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Retrieval Mode Distinguishes the Testing Effect from the Generation Effect. , 2010 .

[31]  Monika Knopf,et al.  Exploring the enactment effect from an information processing view: what can we learn from serial position analyses? , 2011, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[32]  J. Engelkamp,et al.  The role of item-specific information for the serial position curve in free recall. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  The effects of tests on learning and forgetting , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  An automated version of the operation span task , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[35]  J. Engelkamp,et al.  Categorical and order information in free recall of action phrases , 2001 .

[36]  Neil W. Mulligan,et al.  Enactment and retrieval , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Silvia Mecklenbräuker,et al.  Decomposing the memory processes contributing to enactment effects by multinomial modelling , 2009 .

[38]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  The testing effect and the retention interval: questions and answers. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[39]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding , 2012 .

[40]  J. Algina,et al.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[41]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention , 2007 .

[42]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Testing beyond words: Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  B. Molander,et al.  Norms for 439 action events: familiarity, emotionality, motor activity, and memorability. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of psychology.