Transcutaneus Electrical Nerve Stimulation Increases Rectal Activity In Children: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVES Neurostimulation is increasingly used in treating bladder and bowel dysfunction, but its effect on rectal motility is obscure. The aim of the study was to evaluate the acute effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on rectal motility in children with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS In this double-blind placebo-controlled study in 20 children with OAB (mean age 8.6 ± 1.8 years; 7 girls), 48-hour urodynamic monitoring including rectal manometry was performed. After 24-hours of baseline investigation without stimulation the children were randomised to either active TENS (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10). Surface electrodes were placed over the sacral bone. The exterior of active and placebo stimulators was identical. Starting in the morning, the children received either continuous TENS stimulation or placebo until bedtime. Rectal contractions were defned as pressure runs exceeding 5 cm H2O and lasting ≥3 minutes. RESULTS At baseline there was no significant difference in proportion of time with rectal contractions in the 2 groups (TENS group median 31% [range 12%-66%] vs placebo group median 31% [range 10%-66%]; P = 0.75); however, on the day of stimulation there was more time with rectal contractions in the group receiving TENS (median 51% [range 25%-78%]) compared with placebo (median 32% [range 4%-68%]; P = 0.02). Also, there was an increase in time with rectal contractions in the TENS group (P = 0.007) but not in the placebo group (P = 0.39). The night after the TENS was disabled, rectal activity in both groups returned to baseline level. CONCLUSIONS TENS acutely increases time with rectal contractions in children undergoing urodynamic investigation. The effect disappears when the stimulator is turned off.

[1]  S. Laurberg,et al.  A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Irritable Bowel Syndrome , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[2]  P. Dinning,et al.  Transabdominal electrical stimulation increases colonic propagating pressure waves in paediatric slow transit constipation. , 2012, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[3]  J W Arkwright,et al.  Pancolonic motor response to subsensory and suprasensory sacral nerve stimulation in patients with slow‐transit constipation , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the dorsal clitoral nerve reduces incontinence episodes in idiopathic faecal incontinent patients: a pilot study , 2012, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[5]  M. Benninga,et al.  Sacral Neuromodulation Therapy: A Promising Treatment for Adolescents With Refractory Functional Constipation , 2012, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[6]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Acute effect of electrical stimulation of the dorsal genital nerve on rectal capacity in patients with spinal cord injury , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[7]  C. Vaizey,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: results from a single centre over a 10‐year period , 2011, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[8]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Six Years of Experience With Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[9]  Zengri J. Wang,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for intractable constipation , 2010, Gut.

[10]  J. Djurhuus,et al.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for refractory daytime urinary urge incontinence. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[11]  K. Matzel,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long‐term outcome , 2009, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[12]  B. Southwell,et al.  Decreased colonic transit time after transcutaneous interferential electrical stimulation in children with slow transit constipation. , 2009, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[13]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence alters colorectal transport , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  J. Tjandra,et al.  Sacral Nerve Stimulation is more Effective than Optimal Medical Therapy for Severe Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized, Controlled Study , 2008, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  W. V. van Gemert,et al.  Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations , 2007, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[16]  I. Cook,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation induces pan‐colonic propagating pressure waves and increases defecation frequency in patients with slow‐transit constipation , 2007, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[17]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Preliminary results of sacral neuromodulation in 23 children. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[18]  M. Benninga,et al.  Epidemiology of Childhood Constipation: A Systematic Review , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[19]  S. Bauer,et al.  The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: Report from the standardization committee of the International Children's Continence Society (ICCS) , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[20]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Rectal Volume Tolerability and Anal Pressures in Patients With Fecal Incontinence Treated With Sacral Nerve Stimulation , 2006, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[21]  B. Southwell,et al.  Pilot study using transcutaneous electrical stimulation (interferential current) to treat chronic treatment‐resistant constipation and soiling in children , 2005, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[22]  M. De Fazio,et al.  Permanent sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence and associated urinary disturbances , 2004, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[23]  S M Scott,et al.  Manometric techniques for the evaluation of colonic motor activity: current status , 2003, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[24]  B. Parratte,et al.  Urodynamic effect of acute transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in overactive bladder. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[25]  W. Hohenberger,et al.  Sakralnervstimulation in der Behandlung der Stuhlinkontinenz , 2003, Der Chirurg.

[26]  R. Adams,et al.  A pilot study of the home application of transcutaneous neuromodulation in children with urgency or urge incontinence. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[27]  P. Hoebeke,et al.  Transcutaneous neuromodulation for the urge syndrome in children: a pilot study. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[28]  R. Schiessel,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation as a treatment for fecal incontinence. , 2001, Gastroenterology.

[29]  A. Leroi,et al.  Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[30]  M. Kamm,et al.  Double-blind crossover study of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence , 2000, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[31]  R. Shepherd,et al.  A urodynamic study of surface neuromodulation versus sham in detrusor instability and sensory urgency. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[32]  D. Waldron,et al.  Prolonged manometric recording of anorectal motor activity in ambulant human subjects: evidence of periodic activity. , 1989, Gut.