The Effect of Privatization on Public Transit Costs

In an effort to reduce operating deficits, increase productivity, and improve the quality of services, the public transit sector has been moving away from public ownership and operation and towards a franchising arrangement whereby a local government authorizes a private firm to manage and operate the city's public transit system. Profit maximization considerations imply that private managers have stronger incentives for cost efficiency. One such example is the city of Indianapolis which began privatization efforts in its transit operations in 1996. Based upon monthly data from January 1991 through March 1997, this study examines the effect of privatization on the city's cost of providing mass transit. The primary implication of the study is that Indianapolis has experienced an annual 2.5% reduction in operating costs since privatizing the management of its public transit system.

[1]  J. Gómez-Ibáňez,et al.  ALTERNATIVES FOR URBAN BUS SERVICES: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE BRITISH REFORMS , 1997 .

[2]  Ardeshir J. Dalal,et al.  ESTIMATION OF THE ELASTICITIES OF FACTOR SUBSTITUTION IN URBAN BUS TRANSPORTATION: A COST FUNCTION APPROACH* , 1981 .

[3]  Elie Appelbaum,et al.  Demand conditions, regulation, and the measurement of productivity , 1991 .

[4]  Marc Nerlove,et al.  RETURNS TO SCALE IN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY , 1961 .

[5]  Timlynn T. Babitsky,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL FORM AND PERFORMANCE IN URBAN MASS TRANSIT , 1987 .

[6]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Productive efficiency and ownership of urban bus services , 1987 .

[7]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. , 1992 .

[8]  Joseph Berechman.  Cost structure and production technology in transit: An application to the Israeli bus transit sector , 1987 .

[9]  S Glaister,et al.  DEREGULATING THE BUS INDUSTRY IN BRITAIN: A REPLY , 1985 .

[10]  U.K. bus deregulation: a qualified success with much still to offer customers and society at large , 1996 .

[11]  M. Frankena.  Capital-biased subsidies, bureaucratic monitoring, and bus scrapping , 1987 .

[12]  E. Berndt,et al.  Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Singular Equation Systems with Autoregressive Disturbances , 1975 .

[13]  Chris Nash,et al.  DEREGULATING THE BUS INDUSTRY IN BRITAIN: A REJOINDER , 1985 .

[14]  George M. Smerk,et al.  Urban Mass Transportation: A Dozen Years of Federal Policy , 1974 .

[15]  W. Shughart,et al.  A Public Choice Analysis of Public Transit Operating Subsidie , 1991 .

[16]  G. Giuliano,et al.  PRIVATELY PROVIDED COMMUTER BUS SERVICES : EXPERIENCES, PROBLEMS, AND PROSPECTS , 1985 .

[17]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  Subsidy and public transit performance: A factor analytic approach , 1997 .

[18]  J. Pucher.  URBAN PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC POLICIES. PART 2. PUBLIC TRANSPORT, OVERALL COMPARISONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 1995 .

[19]  D. Pickrell.  RISING DEFICITS AND THE USES OF TRANSIT SUBSIDIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1985 .

[20]  P A Viton,et al.  PRIVATELY-PROVIDED URBAN TRANSPORT SERVICES. ENTRY DETERRENCE AND WELFARE , 1982 .

[21]  E K Morlok,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE COSTS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROVIDERS OF MASS TRANSIT , 1985 .

[22]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT COSTS IN THE PRESENCE OF MULTIPLE SERIAL CORRELATION , 1999 .

[23]  Kofi Obeng,et al.  The effect of policy and background variables on total factor productivity for public transit , 1990 .

[24]  R. Oldfield,et al.  The effects of public transport subsidies on demand and supply , 1986 .

[25]  S. Glaister,et al.  DEREGULATING THE BUS INDUSTRY IN BRITAIN - (C) A RESPONSE , 1985 .

[26]  Kofi Obeng,et al.  AN INITIAL ANALYSIS OF TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT , 1986 .

[27]  Martin Williams,et al.  Returns to scale in the United States intercity bus industry , 1981 .

[28]  Genevieve Giuliano,et al.  Analysis of the cost structure of an urban bus transit property , 1984 .

[29]  A. Markstedt,et al.  Consequences of public ownership and subsidies for mass transit: Evidence from case studies and regression analysis , 1983 .

[30]  P. Viton.  Once again, the costs of urban rapid transit , 1993 .

[31]  Ginés de Rus.  PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEMAND ELASTICITIES IN SPAIN , 1990 .

[32]  Philip A. Viton,et al.  Consolidations of scale and scope in urban transit , 1992 .

[33]  R. Cervero.  Cost and performance impacts of transit subsidy programs , 1984 .

[34]  Roger F Teal.  PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE CONTRACTING: A STATUS REPORT , 1986 .

[35]  Chris Nash,et al.  Deregulating the bus industry in Britain — (B) the case against , 1985 .

[36]  A. U. Simpson.  IMPLICATIONS OF EFFICIENCY INCENTIVES ON USE OF PRIVATE SECTOR CONTRACTING BY THE PUBLIC TRANSIT INDUSTRY , 1984 .

[37]  C. Winston.  Government Failure in Urban Transportation , 2000 .

[38]  Philip A. Viton,et al.  On competition and product differentiation in urban transportation: the , 1981 .

[39]  Ian Savage,et al.  Scale economies in United States rail transit systems , 1997 .

[40]  J. Berechman.  Public transit economics and deregulation policy , 1993 .

[41]  Kofi Obeng.  THE ECONOMICS OF BUS TRANSIT OPERATION , 1984 .

[42]  B. Pashigian,et al.  Consequences and Causes of Public Ownership of Urban Transit Facilities , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[43]  J. Vernon,et al.  Economics of regulation and antitrust , 1992 .

[44]  Wayne K. Talley,et al.  A FIRM SPECIFIC ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIES OF SIZE IN THE U.S. URBAN MULTISERVICE TRANSIT INDUSTRY , 1992 .