Group interaction styles in a virtual context: The effects on group outcomes

The influence of communication and information technologies (TICs) on group functioning and group outcomes is an important topic. Interdependent group work implies the need to communicate in order to share information and knowledge related to the task. The importance of this group interaction in the group functioning and outcomes stands out. In this sense, a line of investigation has arisen to study the role of interaction styles in the relationship between communication technology and group outcomes, as some functional or dysfunctional outputs depend on group interaction styles. From this perspective, the objective of this study is twofold: (1) to analyze the group interaction styles in virtual teams over time, and (2) to analyze whether the group virtuality level moderates the relationships between group interaction style and group outcomes over time. Data was collected from a laboratory study in which 44 groups of four members participated. Groups were randomly assigned to communication contexts with different virtuality levels. The results obtained have shown a differential role of group interaction style according to the group virtuality level. Virtuality level plays a moderate role in the relationships between passive group interaction style and objective and subjective outcomes and between constructive interaction style and subjective outcomes.

[1]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[2]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[3]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[4]  Paul R. Yost,et al.  Potency in groups: articulating a construct. , 1993, The British journal of social psychology.

[5]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Time Effects in Computer-Mediated Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2002 .

[6]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[7]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Understanding Human Interaction and Performance in the Virtual Team , 2002 .

[8]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[9]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[10]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Assessing and Testing Interrater Agreement on a Single Target Using Multi-Item Rating Scales , 2001 .

[11]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[13]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[14]  A. Hollingshead.  Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[15]  C. Gibson,et al.  Virtual teams that work : creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness , 2003 .

[16]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[17]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[18]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[19]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis , 2000 .

[20]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Group interaction and flight crew performance , 1988 .

[21]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[22]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work , 2002 .

[23]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[24]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[25]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[26]  Timothy Kuhn,et al.  Do Conflict Management Styles Affect Group Decision Making? Evidence From a Longitudinal Field Study , 2000 .

[27]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[28]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  The Demands-Control-Support model, locus of control and job dissatisfaction: A longitudinal study , 2001 .

[29]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[30]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[31]  V. O. Castella,et al.  Teamwork in different communication contexts: a longitudinal study , 2002 .

[32]  J. Silla,et al.  The influence of familiarity among group members, group atmosphere and assertiveness on uninhibited behavior through three different communication media , 2000 .

[33]  Kimberly M. Christopherson.  The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: "On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog" , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[35]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams , 2001 .

[36]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Conventions for Coordinating Electronic Distributed Work: A Longitudinal Study of Groupware Use , 2002 .

[37]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[38]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[39]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[40]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[41]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[42]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Support Systems: New Perspectives , 1992 .

[43]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Groups, Technology, and Time , 2002 .

[44]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[45]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  The Impact of Group Interaction Styles on Problem-Solving Effectiveness , 1994 .

[46]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[47]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2008 .

[48]  Pilar Ripoll,et al.  La influencia de los procesos de interacción grupal y el medio de comunicación sobre la eficacia de los grupos de trabajo , 2004 .

[49]  J M Schraagen,et al.  Effects of two types of intra-team feedback on developing a shared mental model in Command & Control teams , 2000, Ergonomics.

[50]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Virtual team interaction: assessment, consequences, and management , 2000 .

[51]  C. Cramton.  Attribution in distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[52]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Expertise, extraversion and group interaction styles as performance indicators in virtual teams: how do perceptions of IT's performance get formed? , 2004, DATB.

[53]  J. Peiró,et al.  Conflict Management in Groups that Work in Two Different Communication Contexts , 2002 .

[54]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[55]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Teams , 2002 .

[56]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[57]  Sharmila Pixy Ferris,et al.  Virtual and Collaborative Teams: Process, Technologies, and Practice , 2004 .

[58]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  Pilar Ripoll,et al.  The roles of group potency and information and communication technologies in the relationship between task conflict and team effectiveness: A longitudinal study , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[60]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Understanding Composition and Conflict in Virtual Teams , 2004 .

[61]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[62]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Things to Talk About When Talking About Things , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[63]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[64]  Sharmila Pixy Ferris,et al.  Virtual and Collaborative Teams , 2003 .

[65]  L. Cronbach.  Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed , 1987 .