The ‘user’ in research funding negotiation processes

National research priorities are often the outcome of negotiations between multiple research stakeholders. These stakeholders include groups of research ‘users’, which means that the negotiation processes are no longer controlled by ‘science’. In this paper, we explore the use of the ideographic term ‘users’ in the discourse surrounding the negotiation processes between a New Zealand funding agency, a research institute and an industry body. The case study highlights the implications of translating the ideographic user collective, as it appears in policy, into an individual representative to participate in a negotiation process. The design of negotiation processes should, therefore, recognize that ‘ideal’ user representation may be an unobtainable goal.

[1]  J. Ziman.  Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic 'Steady State' , 2005 .

[2]  B. Martin,et al.  Random selection of citizens for technological decision making , 2002 .

[3]  J.D.H. Keatinge,et al.  Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption ☆ , 2001 .

[4]  Doug Tudhope,et al.  Reconfiguring the User: , 2000 .

[5]  A. Rip,et al.  Users and unicorns: a discussion of mythical beasts in interactive science , 2000 .

[6]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods , 2000 .

[7]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[8]  A. Rip.  A cognitive approach to relevance of science , 1997 .

[9]  P. Weingart.  From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: old wine in new bottles? , 1997 .

[10]  Jon Fixdal.  Consensus conferences as ‘extended peer groups’ , 1997 .

[11]  B. Walker.  Reforming the public sector for leaner government and improved performance: The New Zealand experience , 1996 .

[12]  Pat Walsh,et al.  Public Management: The New Zealand Model , 1996 .

[13]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[14]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[15]  Michael Calvin McGee,et al.  The “ideograph”: A link between rhetoric and ideology , 1980 .

[16]  Arie Rip,et al.  Fashions, Lock-ins and the Heterogeneity of Knowledge Production , 2000 .

[17]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: experiences in Britain, Australia and New Zealand , 1999 .

[18]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Identifying research priorities in public sector funding agencies: mapping science outputs on to user needs , 1998 .

[19]  A. Grimes,et al.  Economic Reform in New Zealand 1984-95: The Pursuit of Efficiency , 1996 .

[20]  Arie Rip,et al.  The research system in transition , 1990 .