Decoherence control in open quantum systems via classical feedback

In this work we propose a strategy using techniques from systems theory to completely eliminate decoherence and also provide conditions under which it can be done. A construction employing an auxiliary system, the bait, which is instrumental to decoupling the system from the environment is presented. Our approach to decoherence control in contrast to other approaches in the literature involves the bilinear input affine model of quantum control system which lends itself to various techniques from classical control theory, but with nontrivial modifications to the quantum regime. The elegance of this approach yields interesting results on open loop decouplability and decoherence free subspaces. Additionally, the feedback control of decoherence may be related to disturbance decoupling for classical input affine systems, which entails careful application of the methods by avoiding all the quantum mechanical pitfalls. In the process of calculating a suitable feedback the system must be restructured due to its tensorial nature of interaction with the environment, which is unique to quantum systems. In the subsequent section we discuss a general information extraction scheme to gain knowledge of the state and the amount of decoherence based on indirect continuous measurement. The analysis of continuous measurement on a decohering quantum system has not been extensively studied before. Finally, a methodology to synthesize feedback parameters itself is given, that technology permitting, could be implemented for practical 2-qubit systems to perform decoherence free quantum computing. The results obtained are qualitatively different and superior to the ones obtained via master equations.

[1]  Tzyh-Jong Tarn,et al.  Feedback control of Decoherence by continuous measurement , 2006 .

[2]  L. Roa,et al.  Measurement-driven quantum evolution , 2005, quant-ph/0509173.

[3]  C. P. Sun,et al.  Quantum control limited by quantum decoherence , 2005, quant-ph/0507217.

[4]  W. Zurek Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited , 2003, quant-ph/0306072.

[5]  N. Ganesan,et al.  Control of decoherence in open quantum systems using feedback , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  F. Buscemi,et al.  Inverting quantum decoherence by classical feedback from the environment. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[7]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Stabilizing qubit coherence via tracking-control , 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[8]  John W. Clark,et al.  Analytic controllability of time-dependent quantum control systems , 2004, quant-ph/0409147.

[9]  Robin Blume-Kohout,et al.  A Simple Example of “Quantum Darwinism”: Redundant Information Storage in Many-Spin Environments , 2004, quant-ph/0408147.

[10]  Hideo Mabuchi,et al.  Suppression of spin projection noise in broadband atomic magnetometry. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[11]  Jie Huang,et al.  Nonlinear Output Regulation: Theory and Applications , 2004 .

[12]  R. Alicki,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory , 2004 .

[13]  Erkki J. Brändas,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory : E. Joos, H. D. Zeh, C. Kiefer, D. Giulini, J. Kupsch and I.-O Stamatescu, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003 , 2004 .

[14]  C. Rangan,et al.  The controllability of infinite quantum systems , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[15]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Magnetic resonance realization of decoherence-free quantum computation. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[16]  Kenneth R. Brown,et al.  Scalable ion trap quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces with pairwise interactions only , 2003 .

[17]  K. Jacobs How to project qubits faster using quantum feedback , 2003, quant-ph/0301056.

[18]  M. Mohseni,et al.  Experimental application of decoherence-free subspaces in an optical quantum-computing algorithm. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[19]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Encoded recoupling and decoupling: An alternative to quantum error-correcting codes applied to trapped-ion quantum computation , 2002, quant-ph/0211088.

[20]  W. Zurek Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.

[21]  C. Altafini QUANTUM MECHANICS (GENERAL AND NONRELATIVISTIC) 2357 Controllability properties for finite dimensional quantum Markovian master equations , 2002, quant-ph/0211194.

[22]  C. Monroe,et al.  Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer , 2002, Nature.

[23]  R. Xu,et al.  Theory of open quantum systems , 2002 .

[24]  S. Wallentowitz Quantum theory of feedback of bosonic gases , 2002, quant-ph/0203069.

[25]  V. Protopopescu,et al.  Robust control of decoherence in realistic one-qubit quantum gates , 2002, quant-ph/0202141.

[26]  D. Cory,et al.  Implementation of universal control on a decoherence-free qubit , 2001, quant-ph/0111166.

[27]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Reducing constraints on quantum computer design by encoded selective recoupling. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[28]  V. Akila,et al.  Information , 2001, The Lancet.

[29]  S. Schirmer,et al.  Complete controllability of finite-level quantum systems , 2001, quant-ph/0102017.

[30]  A. Doherty,et al.  Information, disturbance and Hamiltonian quantum feedback control , 2000, quant-ph/0006013.

[31]  Michael B. Mensky,et al.  Quantum Measurements and Decoherence , 2000 .

[32]  E. Knill,et al.  Universal Control of Decoupled Quantum Systems , 1999, Physical Review Letters.

[33]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Quantum Computation , 1998, quant-ph/9807004.

[34]  V. Buzek,et al.  Quantum State Reconstruction From Incomplete Data , 1998, quant-ph/9805020.

[35]  S. Haroche,et al.  Experiments with single atoms in a cabity: entanglement, Schrödinger's cats and decoherence , 1997, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  R. Omnes General theory of the decoherence effect in quantum mechanics , 1997 .

[37]  S. Ya. Kilin,et al.  Decoherence slowing via feedback , 1997 .

[38]  Jean-Michel Raimond,et al.  Reversible Decoherence of a Mesoscopic Superposition of Field States , 1997 .

[39]  Dreyer,et al.  Observing the Progressive Decoherence of the "Meter" in a Quantum Measurement. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[40]  Shor,et al.  Good quantum error-correcting codes exist. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[41]  Shor,et al.  Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[42]  Wiseman,et al.  Quantum theory of continuous feedback. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[43]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Non-linear dynamical control systems , 1990 .

[44]  Wineland,et al.  Quantum Zeno effect. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[45]  Daizhan Cheng,et al.  Global ( f,g )-invariance of nonlinear systems , 1988 .

[46]  A. Isidori Nonlinear Control Systems , 1985 .

[47]  T. Tarn,et al.  On the controllability of quantum‐mechanical systems , 1983 .

[48]  W. Zurek Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? , 1981 .

[49]  W. Louisell Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation , 1973 .