The effects of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on perceived feedback accuracy.

Using a 2 × 2 experimental design, the present study examined the main and interactive effects of feedback sequence (negative-positive vs. positive-negative) and expertise of the rater (high vs. low) on perceptions of feedback accuracy. In addition, the study assessed the moderating effects of locus of control and self-esteem on the relationship between feedback sequence and perceived feedback accuracy. Results indicate that the order in which positive or negative feedback is presented affects perceived feedback accuracy. Moreover, results suggest that feedback sequence interacts with the expertise of the rater to affect perceptions of feedback accuracy. In addition, the findings suggest that both locus of control and self-esteem moderate the relationship between feedback sequence and perceived feedback accuracy. Implications of the study's findings for presenting feedback in performance appraisal/feedback sessions are discussed.

[1]  A. Denisi,et al.  Potential Problems with Peer Ratings , 1983 .

[2]  Akinori Okada,et al.  Mechanism of feedback affecting task performance , 1983 .

[3]  Douglas Cederblom.  The Performance Appraisal Interview: A Review, Implications, and Suggestions , 1982 .

[4]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. , 1982 .

[5]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Poor performers: Supervisors' and subordinates' responses , 1981 .

[6]  Jeanette N. Cleveland,et al.  Perceived Fairness and Accuracy of Performance Evaluation: A Follow-Up. , 1980 .

[7]  M. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .

[8]  J. S. Shrauger,et al.  Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. , 1979 .

[9]  Howard M. Weiss,et al.  Self Esteem, Information Search and Problem Solving Efficiency. , 1979 .

[10]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  J. Tognoli,et al.  Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attraction: a replication and extension. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  J. Hewitt.  Liking and the proportion of favorable evaluations. , 1972 .

[13]  A. Kraut,et al.  Employee Reactions to Attitude Survey Feedback: A Study of the Impact of Structure and Process , 1971 .

[14]  D. Mettee.  Changes in liking as a function of the magnitude and affect of sequential evaluations , 1971 .

[15]  E. Blanchard,et al.  Perception of Choice and Locus of Control , 1971, Psychological reports.

[16]  J. S. Shrauger,et al.  Self‐esteem and the effects of success and failure feedback on performance , 1970 .

[17]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Opinion change and the gain-loss model of interpersonal attraction , 1967 .

[18]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[19]  E Kay,et al.  Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview. , 1965, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness , 1965 .