Structural Reliability Assessment Based on the Improved Constrained Differential Evolution Algorithm

In this work, the reliability analysis is employed to take into account the uncertainties in a structure. Reliability analysis is a tool to compute the probability of failure corresponding to a given failure mode. In this study, one of the most commonly used reliability analysis method namely first order reliability method is used to calculate the probability of failure. Since finding the most probable point (MPP) or design point is a constrained optimization problem, in contrast to all the previous studies based on the penalty function method or the preference of the feasible solutions technique, in this study one of the latest versions of the differential evolution metaheuristic algorithm named improved (μ+λ)-constrained differential evolution (ICDE) based on the multi-objective constraint-handling technique is utilized. The ICDE is very easy to implement because there is no need to the time-consuming task of fine tuning of the penalty parameters. Several test problems are used to verify the accuracy and efficiency of the ICDE. The statistical comparisons revealed that the performance of ICDE is better than or comparable with the other considered methods. Also, it shows acceptable convergence rate in the process of finding the design point. According to the results and easier implementation of ICDE, it can be expected that the proposed method would become a robust alternative to the penalty function based methods for the reliability assessment problems in the future works.

[1]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability , 1993 .

[2]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Optimization algorithms for structural reliability , 1991 .

[3]  Hao Yan,et al.  Structural Reliability Analysis Based on Imperialist Competitive Algorithm , 2013, 2013 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Engineering Applications.

[4]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[5]  Jouni Lampinen,et al.  Constrained Real-Parameter Optimization with Generalized Differential Evolution , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Trung Nguyen-Thoi,et al.  An improved constrained differential evolution using discrete variables (D-ICDE) for layout optimization of truss structures , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Two Improved Algorithms for Reliability Analysis , 1995 .

[8]  Tian Bao Gao,et al.  Reliability Analysis and Design Suggestion of Concrete Structure Bonded Rebars with Inorganic Material , 2010 .

[9]  Yong Wang,et al.  An improved (μ + λ)-constrained differential evolution for constrained optimization , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[10]  Carlos Artemio Coello-Coello,et al.  Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art , 2002 .

[11]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT UTILIZING FOUR METAHEURISTIC ALGORITHMS , 2015 .

[12]  M. Miri,et al.  A new efficient simulation method to approximate the probability of failure and most probable point , 2012 .

[13]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability Concepts in Engineering: Emphasis on Applications to Civil and Environmental Engineering , 2006 .

[14]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[15]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  First-Order Approximation Methods in Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2005 .

[16]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[17]  Jian Wang,et al.  Linkage-shredding genetic algorithm for reliability assessment of structural systems , 2005 .

[18]  Hui Li,et al.  A structural reliability-based sensitivity analysis method using particles swarm optimization: relative convergence rate , 2016 .

[19]  Charles Elegbede,et al.  Structural reliability assessment based on particles swarm optimization , 2005 .

[20]  P. E. James T. P. Yao,et al.  Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design , 2001 .

[21]  C A Cornell,et al.  A PROBABILITY BASED STRUCTURAL CODE , 1969 .

[22]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Metaheuristic Applications in Structures and Infrastructures , 2013 .

[23]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Reliability-based Structural Design , 2006 .

[24]  F. Grooteman Adaptive radial-based importance sampling method for structural reliability , 2008 .

[25]  V. Ho-Huu,et al.  An effective reliability-based improved constrained differential evolution for reliability-based design optimization of truss structures , 2016, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[26]  A. Kaveh,et al.  STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ANALYSIS USING CHARGED SYSTEM SEARCH ALGORITHM , 2014 .

[27]  A. Sellier,et al.  Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique , 2009 .

[28]  Nicolas Devictor Fiabilite et mecanique : methodes form/sorm et couplages avec des codes d'elements finis par des surfaces de reponse adaptatives , 1996 .

[29]  Mohamed Benouaret,et al.  Improved bat algorithm for structural reliability assessment: application and challenges , 2016 .

[30]  Hongbo Zhao,et al.  Reliability Analysis Using Chaotic Particle Swarm Optimization , 2015, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[31]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Structural reliability under combined random load sequences , 1978 .

[32]  K. Deb An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[33]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[34]  V. I. Weingarten,et al.  Buckling of thin-walled truncated cones , 1968 .

[35]  Niels C. Lind,et al.  Methods of structural safety , 2006 .