How protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the chaperonin cage: Molecular simulations

How the Escherichia coli GroEL/ES chaperonin assists folding of a substrate protein remains to be uncovered. Recently, it was suggested that confinement into the chaperonin cage itself can significantly accelerate folding of a substrate. Performing comprehensive molecular simulations of eight proteins confined into various sizes L of chaperonin-like cage, we explore how and to what extent protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the cage. We show that a substrate protein is remarkably stabilized by confinement; the estimated increase in denaturation temperature ΔTf is as large as ≈60°C. For a protein of size R0, the stabilization ΔTf scales as (R0/L)ν, where ν ≈ 3, which is consistent with a mean field theory of polymer. We also found significant free energy cost of confining a protein, which increases with R0/L, indicating that the confinement requires external work provided by the chaperonin system. In kinetic study, we show the folding is accelerated in a modestly well confined case, which is consistent with a recent experimental result on ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase folding and simulation results of a β hairpin. Interestingly, the acceleration of folding is likely to be larger for a protein with more complex topology, as quantified by the contact order. We also show how ensemble of folding pathways are altered by the chaperonin-like cage calculating a variant of φ value used in the study of spontaneous folding.

[1]  P. Gennes Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics , 1979 .

[2]  A. Horwich,et al.  Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[3]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[4]  D. J. Naylor,et al.  Dual Function of Protein Confinement in Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding , 2001, Cell.

[5]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[6]  N. Go,et al.  Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation. I. The effect of specific amino acid sequence represented by specific inter-unit interactions. , 2009 .

[7]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S. Takada,et al.  On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction , 2002 .

[9]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.

[10]  S W Englander,et al.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. , 1999, Science.

[11]  A. Minton Implications of macromolecular crowding for protein assembly. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  K Gulukota,et al.  Statistical mechanics of kinetic proofreading in protein folding in vivo. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  David Baker,et al.  Important role of hydrogen bonds in the structurally polarized transition state for folding of the src SH3 domain , 1998, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[14]  J. Onuchic,et al.  How native-state topology affects the folding of dihydrofolate reductase and interleukin-1beta. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Yechezkel Kashi,et al.  GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms , 1994, Cell.

[17]  F. Hartl,et al.  The oligomeric structure of GroEL/GroES is required for biologically significant chaperonin function in protein folding , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[18]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Navigating the folding routes , 1995, Science.

[19]  S. Takada,et al.  Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a Go-like model. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  A. Horwich,et al.  Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL , 1997, Nature.

[21]  A. Fersht,et al.  GroEL recognises sequential and non-sequential linear structural motifs compatible with extended beta-strands and alpha-helices. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  J. Valentine,et al.  Molecular confinement influences protein structure and enhances thermal protein stability , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[24]  N. Go Theoretical studies of protein folding. , 1983, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[25]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL , 1999, Nature.

[26]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[28]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  J. Weissman,et al.  Mechanism of GroEL action: Productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under groes , 1995, Cell.

[30]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  A. Fersht Structure and mechanism in protein science , 1998 .

[32]  S. Takada Go-ing for the prediction of protein folding mechanisms. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[34]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Simulations of β-hairpin folding confined to spherical pores using distributed computing , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  F. Hartl,et al.  Molecular Chaperones in the Cytosol: from Nascent Chain to Folded Protein , 2002, Science.

[36]  D Thirumalai,et al.  The nature of folded states of globular proteins , 1992, Biopolymers.

[37]  K A Dill,et al.  Stabilization of proteins in confined spaces. , 2001, Biochemistry.