Caller sex and orientation influence spectral characteristics of "two-voice" stereotyped calls produced by free-ranging killer whales.

This study investigates how particular received spectral characteristics of stereotyped calls of sexually dimorphic adult killer whales may be influenced by caller sex, orientation, and range. Calls were ascribed to individuals during natural behavior using a towed beamforming array. The fundamental frequency of both high-frequency and low-frequency components did not differ consistently by sex. The ratio of peak energy within the fundamental of the high-frequency component relative to summed peak energy in the first two low-frequency component harmonics, and the number of modulation bands off the high-frequency component, were significantly greater when whales were oriented towards the array, while range and adult sex had little effect. In contrast, the ratio of peak energy in the first versus second harmonics of the low-frequency component was greater in calls produced by adult females than adult males, while orientation and range had little effect. The dispersion of energy across harmonics has been shown to relate to body size or sex in terrestrial species, but pressure effects during diving are thought to make such a signal unreliable in diving animals. The observed spectral differences by signaler sex and orientation suggest that these types of information may be transmitted acoustically by freely diving killer whales.

[1]  Kenneth J. Dormer,et al.  Mechanism of sound production and air recycling in delphinids: Cineradiographic evidence , 1979 .

[2]  M. Amundin Helium effects on the click frequency spectrum of the Harbor porpoise, Phocoena phocoena , 1991 .

[3]  J. Ford,et al.  Vocal traditions among resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in coastal waters of British Columbia , 1991 .

[4]  W. M. Masters,et al.  Sonar signals of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, contain information about individual identity, age and family affiliation , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  A J Houtsma,et al.  Discrimination of changes in the spectral shape of two-tone complexes. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. Ryan,et al.  Correlations between call characteristics and morphology in male cricket frogs (Acris crepitans). , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  T. Cranford,et al.  Functional morphology and homology in the odontocete nasal complex: Implications for sound generation , 1996, Journal of morphology.

[8]  W. Fitch Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Detection of changes in timbre and harmonicity in complex sounds by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). , 1998, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  Peter L. Tyack,et al.  A small towed beamforming array to identify vocalizing resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) concurrent with focal behavioral observations , 1998 .

[11]  P. Slater,et al.  The different roles of social learning in vocal communication , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  P. Miller,et al.  Within-pod variation in the sound production of a pod of killer whales, Orcinus orca , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Stephanie Seneff,et al.  Robust pitch tracking for prosodic modeling in telephone speech , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100).

[14]  P Spong,et al.  Dialect change in resident killer whales: implications for vocal learning and cultural transmission , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Ted W. Cranford,et al.  In Search of Impulse Sound Sources in Odontocetes , 2000 .

[16]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[17]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Estimating the distance to a source of sound: mechanisms and adaptations for long-range communication , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  C. E. Schlundt,et al.  Hearing and whistling in the deep sea: depth influences whistle spectra but does not attenuate hearing by white whales (Delphinapterus leucas) (Odontoceti, Cetacea). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  P. Miller Mixed-directionality of killer whale stereotyped calls: a direction of movement cue? , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  W. Au,et al.  DIRECTIONALITY IN THE WHISTLES OF HAWAIIAN SPINNER DOLPHINS (STENELLA LONGIROSTRIS): A SIGNAL FEATURE TO CUE DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT? , 2003 .

[21]  A. Solow,et al.  Call-type matching in vocal exchanges of free-ranging resident killer whales, Orcinus orca , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  D. Papaj,et al.  Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  D. Rendall,et al.  Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  J. Terhune,et al.  Calling depth and time and frequency attributes of harp (Pagophilus groenlandicus) and Weddell (Leptonychotes weddellii) seal underwater vocalizations , 2005 .

[25]  P. Thompson,et al.  Diving deep in a foraging hotspot: acoustic insights into bottlenose dolphin dive depths and feeding behaviour , 2006 .

[26]  V. Janik,et al.  Signature whistle shape conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  P. Miller,et al.  The influence of social affiliation on individual vocal signatures of northern resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) , 2006, Biology Letters.

[28]  P. Nachtigall,et al.  The perception of complex tones by a false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens). , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.