Distributed preference relations for multiple attribute decision analysis

In this paper, we propose a new pairwise comparison approach called distributed preference relation (DPR) to simultaneously signify preferred, non-preferred, indifferent, and uncertain degrees of one alternative over another on a set of grades, which is more versatile for elicitation of preference information from a decision maker than multiplicative preference relation, fuzzy preference relation (FPR) and intuitionistic FPR. In a DPR matrix on a set of alternatives, each element is a distribution recording the preferred, non-preferred, indifferent, and uncertain degrees of one alternative over another using a set of grades. To facilitate the comparison of alternatives, we define a score matrix based on a DPR matrix using the given score values of the grades. Its additive consistency is constructed, analysed, and compared with the additive consistency of FPRs between alternatives. A method for comparing two interval numbers is then employed to create a possibility matrix from the score matrix, which can generate a ranking order of alternatives with possibility degrees. A problem of evaluating strategic emerging industries is investigated using the approach to demonstrate the application of a DPR matrix to modelling and analysing a multiple attribute decision analysis problem.

[1]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgment , 1998 .

[2]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Operations Research Decision Making , 1999 .

[3]  Jian Liu,et al.  A new decision support model in multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on risk preferences and criteria reduction , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[5]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Group Decision Making and its Optimization With an Allocation of Information Granularity , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[6]  Z. Xu,et al.  Iterative algorithms for improving consistency of intuitionistic preference relations , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Algorithms for estimating missing elements of incomplete intuitionistic preference relations , 2011, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[8]  Yejun Xu,et al.  The ordinal consistency of a fuzzy preference relation , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[9]  Ira Horowitz,et al.  The linear programming alternative to policy capturing for eliciting criteria weights in the performance appraisal process , 1995 .

[10]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Logarithmic least squares method to priority for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations , 2013 .

[11]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  An attribute weight based feedback model for multiple attributive group decision analysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning context , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Simulation of fuzzy multiattribute models for grey relationships , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Zaiwu Gong,et al.  Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[14]  Cerry M. Klein,et al.  An efficient approach to solving fuzzy MADM problems , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[15]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[17]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Dan Horsky,et al.  Estimation of Attribute Weights from Preference Comparisons , 1984 .

[19]  Jian Ma,et al.  A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[20]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Application of consistent fuzzy preference relations in predicting the success of knowledge management implementation , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Note on “Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations” , 2008 .

[22]  P. Farquhar State of the Art—Utility Assessment Methods , 1984 .

[23]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Zhou-Jing Wang,et al.  Goal programming approaches to deriving interval weights based on interval fuzzy preference relations , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[26]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  John R. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best , 2001 .

[28]  Dong-Ling Xu,et al.  Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[29]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Charalambos L. Iacovou,et al.  Determining attribute weights using mathematical programming , 2003 .

[32]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  A consensus‐reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[35]  John A. Keane,et al.  Enumerating all spanning trees for pairwise comparisons , 2012, Comput. Oper. Res..

[36]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[37]  Quan Zhang,et al.  An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on preference information on alternatives , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[38]  Z. S. Xu,et al.  The uncertain OWA operator , 2002, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[39]  P. Sen,et al.  Design decision making based upon multiple attribute evaluations and minimal preference information , 1994 .

[40]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[41]  Stan Lipovetsky,et al.  Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[44]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  On the composition of intuitionistic fuzzy relations , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[45]  James B. Herendeen Operations Research in Decision Making , 1976 .

[46]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[47]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[48]  P. Yu,et al.  Estimating criterion weights using eigenvectors: A comparative study , 1987 .

[49]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[50]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic and interval-valued intutionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group , 2009, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[51]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[52]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An error-analysis-based method for the priority of an intuitionistic preference relation in decision making , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[53]  Michael N. Huhns,et al.  A consensus framework for multiple attribute group decision analysis in an evidential reasoning context , 2014, Inf. Fusion.