Deriving shape space parameters from immunological data.

We present a method for deriving shape space parameters that are consistent with immunological data, and illustrate the method by deriving shape space parameters for a model of cross-reactive memory. Cross-reactive memory responses occur when the immune system is primed by one strain of a pathogen and challenged with a related, but different, strain. Much of the nature of a cross-reactive response is determined by the quantity and distribution of the memory cells, raised to the primary antigen, that cross-react with the secondary antigen. B cells with above threshold affinity for an antigen lie in a region of shape space that we call a ball of stimulation. In a cross-reactive response, the intersection of the balls of stimulation of the primary and secondary antigens contains the cross-reactive B cells and thus determines the degree of cross-reactivity between the antigens. We derive formulas for the volume of intersection of balls of stimulation in different shape spaces and show that the parameters of shape space, such as its dimensionality, have a large impact on the number of B cells in the intersection. The application of our method for driving shape space parameters indicates that, for Hamming shape spaces, 20 to 25 dimensions, a three or four letter alphabet, and balls of stimulation of radius five or six, are choices that match the experimental data. For Euclidean shape spaces, five to eight dimensions and balls of stimulation with radius about 20% of the radius of the whole space, match the experimental data.

[1]  Thomas Francis,et al.  INFLUENZA: THE NEWE ACQUAYANTANCE , 1953 .

[2]  R. Webster,et al.  DISQUISITIONS ON ORIGINAL ANTIGENIC SIN , 1966, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  R. Webster,et al.  Disquisitions of Original Antigenic Sin. I. Evidence in man. , 1966, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[4]  Edward Jenner,et al.  An inquiry into the causes and effects of the Variolæ vaccinæ, 1798 , 1966 .

[5]  Max Samter,et al.  Antigens, Lymphoid Cells, and the Immune Response , 1971 .

[6]  Sylvia Deutsch,et al.  Original antigenic sin at the cellular level I. Antibodies produced by individual cells against cross‐reacting haptens , 1972, European journal of immunology.

[7]  Edelman Gm Origins and mechanisms of specificity in clonal selection. , 1974 .

[8]  N. K. Jerne,et al.  Clonal selection in a lymphocyte network. , 1974, Society of General Physiologists series.

[9]  G M Edelman,et al.  Origins and mechanisms of specificity in clonal selection. , 1974, Society of General Physiologists series.

[10]  G Köhler,et al.  Frequency of precursor cells against the enzyme β‐galactosidase An estimate of the BALB/c strain antibody repertoire , 1976, European journal of immunology.

[11]  W Gerhard The analysis of the monoclonal immune response to influenza virus. III. The relationship between stimulation of virus-primed precursor B cells by heterologous viruses and reactivity of secreted antibodies. , 1978, Journal of immunology.

[12]  G. Oster,et al.  Theoretical studies of clonal selection: minimal antibody repertoire size and reliability of self-non-self discrimination. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  S J Leach,et al.  Original antigenic sin: experiments with a defined antigen. , 1980, Molecular immunology.

[14]  Original antigenic sin to influenza in rats. , 1982, Immunology.

[15]  D. Nelson,et al.  Specificity of in vitro anti-influenza virus antibody production by human lymphocytes: analysis of original antigenic sin by limiting dilution cultures. , 1984, Journal of immunology.

[16]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  The immune system, adaptation, and machine learning , 1986 .

[17]  R. Poljak,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of an antigen-antibody complex at 2.8 A resolution , 1986, Science.

[18]  H. Lodish Molecular Cell Biology , 1986 .

[19]  C. Milstein,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of the Antibody Repertoire , 1988, Immunological reviews.

[20]  Pentti Kanerva,et al.  Sparse Distributed Memory , 1988 .

[21]  Suzanne Fish,et al.  MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL ANTIGENIC SIN , 1989 .

[22]  T. Manser,et al.  Molecular analysis of original antigenic sin. I. Clonal selection, somatic mutation, and isotype switching during a memory B cell response , 1989, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  A. Perelson,et al.  Size and connectivity as emergent properties of a developing immune network. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  A S Perelson,et al.  Pattern formation in one- and two-dimensional shape-space models of the immune system. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  P E Seiden,et al.  A model for simulating cognate recognition and response in the immune system. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  A. Perelson,et al.  Predicting the size of the T-cell receptor and antibody combining region from consideration of efficient self-nonself discrimination. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  G. Weisbuch,et al.  Capacity of a model immune network. , 1994, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[28]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  The Evolution of Emergent Organization in Immune System Gene Libraries , 1995, ICGA.

[29]  A S Perelson,et al.  Evolution and somatic learning in V-region genes. , 1996, Research in immunology.

[30]  A. Perelson,et al.  Size and connectivity of the idiotypic network are independent of the discreteness of the affinity distribution. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.