Use of Heuristics to Facilitate Scientific Discovery Learning in a Simulation Learning Environment in a Physics Domain

This article describes a study into the role of heuristic support in facilitating discovery learning through simulation‐based learning. The study compares the use of two such learning environments in the physics domain of collisions. In one learning environment (implicit heuristics) heuristics are only used to provide the learner with guidance derived from heuristics, without presenting the heuristics themselves; in the other (explicit heuristics) the heuristics themselves are also made explicit to the learner. The two learning environments are tested with 46 students from two schools. The results show that learners in both conditions gain domain knowledge from pre‐test to post‐test. Regression analyses show that pre‐test results can predict post‐test results in the implicit heuristics condition but not in the explicit heuristic condition. Process analyses suggest that presenting the heuristics explicitly facilitate more self‐regulation in students.

[1]  G. Pólya,et al.  How to Solve It , 1945 .

[2]  J. E. Tschirgi,et al.  Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. , 1980 .

[3]  Pat Langley,et al.  Data-Driven Discovery of Physical Laws , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .

[5]  Robert H. Rivers,et al.  Computer simulations to stimulate scientific problem solving , 1987 .

[6]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Processes of Scientific Discovery: The Strategy of Experimentation , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Ron Good,et al.  The nature and use of prediction skills in a biological computer simulation , 1988 .

[9]  E. Soloway,et al.  Causal Model Progressions as a Foundation for Intelligent Learning Environments , 1990 .

[10]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills in Microcomputer-Based Laboratories , 1990 .

[11]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[12]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Learning and instruction with computer simulations , 1991 .

[13]  Wouter van Joolingen,et al.  Characteristics of simulations for instructional settings , 1991 .

[14]  P. Reimann Detecting functional relations in a computerized discovery environment , 1991 .

[15]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Causal Models and Experimentation Strategies in Scientific Reasoning , 1991 .

[16]  L. Schauble,et al.  Cross-Domain Development of Scientific Reasoning , 1992 .

[17]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving , 1992 .

[18]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Scientific Reasoning Across Different Domains , 1992 .

[19]  D. Klahr,et al.  Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Developmental Study , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Computers As Cognitive Tools , 2020 .

[21]  B. White ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[22]  T. Jong,et al.  Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support , 1993 .

[23]  Quinn James,et al.  The Effects of Simulation Complexity and Hypothesis-Generation Strategy on Learning , 1994 .

[24]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom , 1995 .

[25]  A. Zohar Reasoning about Interactions between Variables , 1995 .

[26]  D. Hodson Laboratory work as scientific method: three decades of confusion and distortion , 1996 .

[27]  Ton de Jong,et al.  An extended dual search space model of scientific discovery learning , 1997 .

[28]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Science fiction: the continuing misrepresentation of science in the school curriculum , 1998 .

[29]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[30]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Instructional, Curricular, and Technological Supports for Inquiry in Science Classrooms , 1998 .

[31]  D. Klahr,et al.  All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. , 1999, Child development.

[32]  Wouter van Joolingen,et al.  Cognitive tools for discovery learning , 1999 .

[33]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  John B. Black,et al.  The Development of Cognitive Skills To Support Inquiry Learning , 2000 .

[35]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Promoting Self-Directed Learning in Simulation-Based Discovery Learning Environments Through Intelligent Support , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[36]  William E. J. Doane,et al.  Setting Theoretical and Empirical Foundations for Assessing Scientific Inquiry and Discovery in Educational Programs. , 2000 .

[37]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[38]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Discovery simulations and the assessment of intuitive knowledge , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[39]  R. Mayer Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[40]  Ton de Jong,et al.  The effects of discovery learning and expository instruction on the acquisition of definitional and intuitive knowledge , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[41]  R. Cheloha,et al.  The of a Development , 2004 .