Degree of disturbance rejection capability for linear anti-stable systems

Controllability is a structural property that carries information useful for control system design. There are several measures to determine the location of actuator, and one of them is degree of disturbance rejection capability (DODR). DODR is a quantitative measure representing how controllable the system is under the presence of persistent disturbance. However, this measure is defined in asymptotically stable systems, not in unstable systems. Thus, the problem to apply the measure to unstable system still remains. In this paper, therefore, the way to apply DODR to anti-stable systems is proposed as preliminary research. The definition of the measure is same with existing measure of DODR. We used Gramians of a system which has poles in the mirror image side of the original given system.

[1]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  Controllability of linear dynamical systems , 1963 .

[2]  D. Rossiter,et al.  Input screening method for disturbance rejection , 1996 .

[3]  C. Paige.  Properties of numerical algorithms related to computing controllability , 1981 .

[4]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Design of resilient processing plants—III: A general framework for the assessment of dynamic resilience , 1983 .

[5]  W. Luyben.  The concept of Eigenstructure in process control , 1988 .

[6]  Youngjin Park,et al.  Actuator and Exciter Placement for Flexible Structures , 1997 .

[7]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Design of resilient processing plants—VII. Design of energy management system for unstable reactors—new insights , 1985 .

[8]  Richard W. Longman,et al.  A degree of controllability definition - Fundamental concepts and application to modal systems , 1984 .

[9]  H. Weber,et al.  Analysis and optimization of certain qualities of controllability and observability for linear dynamical systems , 1972 .

[10]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Simple frequency-dependent tools for control system analysis, structure selection and design , 1992, Autom..

[11]  Kazuyuki Shimizu,et al.  Directions of disturbances and modeling errors on the control quality in distillation systems , 1985 .

[12]  T. McAvoy,et al.  Short cut operability analysis. 1. The relative disturbance gain , 1985 .

[13]  A. Hamdan,et al.  Measures of Modal Controllability and Observability for First- and Second-Order Linear Systems , 1989 .

[14]  Diane Rossiter,et al.  Input selection for disturbance rejection under manipulated variable constraints , 1997 .

[15]  M. Morari,et al.  Effect of disturbance directions on closed-loop performance , 1987 .

[16]  Youngjin Park,et al.  New Measure Representing Degree of Controllability for Disturbance Rejection , 2009 .

[17]  Marghub Alam Mirza,et al.  Optimal Actuator Placement for Active Vibration Control With Known Disturbances , 1999 .