A multi-agent simulation model for spatial optimisation of manure allocation

The EU Nitrate Directive has spurred many countries to regulate manure production and manure application. Farmers have three allocation options: spreading manure on their own land, transporting manure to other farmers' land or processing manure. The manure problem can be seen as an allocation problem. To better understand this allocation problem, we have developed the spatial mathematical programming multi-agent simulation (MP-MAS) model. This model has been applied in Flanders, Belgium, a region with a high concentration of livestock. The model evaluates the cost efficiency of policy intervention in the manure market through obliged processing. We propose to further optimise the policy using a regionally differentiated manure pressure indicator, which is directly derived from the dual outcome of the mathematical programme. This indicator increases transparency in the manure and processing market, leading to better decision support about location and type of manure processing.

[1]  G. Huylenbroeck,et al.  Markets of concentration permits: The case of manure policy , 2011 .

[2]  R. Melse,et al.  Sustainable intensive livestock production demands manure and exhaust air treatment technologies. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[3]  Albert Magrí,et al.  Manure treatment technologies: on-farm versus centralized strategies. NE Spain as case study. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[4]  John Helming,et al.  Modelling the economic consequences of the EU Water Framework Directive for Dutch agriculture. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  J. Buysse,et al.  Impact of policy-induced structural change on milk quality: evidence from the Flemish dairy sector , 2009, Journal of Dairy Research.

[6]  P. Marklund,et al.  Stringency of Environmental Targets in Animal Agriculture: Shedding Light on Policy with Shadow Prices , 2008 .

[7]  T. H. Lewis.  Managing Manure: Using Good Neighbor Agreements to Regulate Pollution from Agricultural Production , 2008 .

[8]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  A method to define a typology for agent-based analysis in regional land-use research , 2008 .

[9]  Flexible quota constraints in positive mathematical programming models , 2008 .

[10]  Harald Grethea,et al.  107th EAAE Seminar “Modelling of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies" , 2008 .

[11]  Fertilization: trade-offs between manure abatement and plant productivity , 2008 .

[12]  S. Nolte.  THE FUTURE OF THE WORLD SUGAR MARKET--A SPATIAL PRICE EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS , 2008 .

[13]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Simulating soil fertility and poverty dynamics in Uganda: A bio-economic multi-agent systems approach , 2007 .

[14]  Philip M. Haygarth,et al.  Agriculture, phosphorus and eutrophication: a European perspective , 2007 .

[15]  Jeroen Buysse,et al.  Normative, positive and econometric mathematical programming as tools for incorporation of multifunctionality in agricultural policy modelling , 2007 .

[16]  Jean-Marie Paillat,et al.  A conceptual representation of animal waste management at the farm scale: The case of the Reunion Island , 2006 .

[17]  G. Huylenbroeck,et al.  Explaining Differences in Farm Sustainability: Evidence from Flemish Dairy Farms , 2006 .

[18]  Thierry Bréchet,et al.  Models for policy-making in sustainable development: The state of the art and perspectives for research , 2005 .

[19]  R. Melse,et al.  Evaluation of four farm-scale systems for the treatment of liquid pig manure , 2005 .

[20]  R. Senoussi,et al.  Are agronomic models useful for studying farmers' fertilisation practices? , 2005 .

[21]  Eli Feinerman,et al.  The Use of Organic vs. Chemical Fertilizer with a Mineral Losses Tax: The Case of Dutch Arable Farmers , 2005 .

[22]  A. Alvarez,et al.  Explaining Differences in Milk Quota Values: The Role of Economic Efficiency , 2006 .

[23]  N. Verdoes,et al.  Quick scan van be- en verwerkingstechnieken voor dierlijke mest , 2004 .

[24]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Agent based simulation of a small catchment water management in northern Thailand: Description of the CATCHSCAPE model , 2003 .

[25]  T. Tietenberg.  The Tradable-Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: Lessons for Climate Change , 2003 .

[26]  Rémy Courdier,et al.  Agent-based simulation of complex systems: application to collective management of animal wastes , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[27]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: A simulation tool , 2001 .

[28]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  A systems approach to analyse the effects of Flemish manure policy on structural changes and cost abatement in pig farming , 1998 .

[29]  I. Fraser,et al.  The allocation of sugarbeet production contracts: An application of calibrated production equilibrium modelling , 1997 .

[30]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Emissions Trading and Profitability: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry , 1998 .

[31]  Jean-Christophe Bureau.  Quota Mobility in the European Sugar Regime , 1995 .

[32]  Peter Mahler.  Efficiency losses as a result of insufficient structural adjustments due to the EC sugar regime: The case of Germany , 1994 .

[33]  Paul van Beek,et al.  An OR contribution to the solution of the environmental problems in the Netherlands caused by manure , 1991 .

[34]  P. Zusman.  Spatial and temporal price and allocation models , 1971 .